{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]],"date-time":"2026-03-03T15:40:56Z","timestamp":1772552456710,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":4,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]],"date-time":"2006-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1146441600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>This second part of the paper summarizes typical pitfalls as they can be observed in larger process modeling projects.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>The identified pitfalls have been derived from a series of focus groups and semi\u2010structured interviews with business process analysts and managers of process management and modeling projects.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>The article continues the discussion of the first part. It covers issues related to tools and related requirements (7\u201010), the practice of modeling (11\u201016), the way we design to\u2010be models (17\u201019), and how we deal with success of modeling and maintenance issues (19\u201021). Potential pitfalls related to strategy and governance (1\u20103) and the involved stakeholders (4\u20106) were discussed in the first part of this paper.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Research limitations\/implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper is a personal viewpoint, and does not report on the outcomes of a structured qualitative research project.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>The provided list of intotal 22 pitfalls increases the awareness for the main challenges related to process modeling and helps to identify common mistakes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper is one of the very few contributions in the area of challenges related to process modeling.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/14637150610668024","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,7,4]],"date-time":"2006-07-04T06:07:38Z","timestamp":1151993258000},"page":"377-384","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":61,"title":["Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part B"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Michael","family":"Rosemann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2022020420455329900_b1","unstructured":"Davenport, T. (2004), \u201cModeling in moderation\u201d, Process Innovation. A Business Process Trends Column, June, available at: www.bptrends.com."},{"key":"key2022020420455329900_b2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davies, P.G., Rosemann, M. and Gallo, S. (2004), \u201cConceptual modelling \u2013 Why do we do it?\u201d, in Atzeni, P. et al. (Eds), Proceedings of the International Conference on Conceptual Modelling (ER 2004), Shanghai, 8\u201011 November, pp. 30\u201042.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-30464-7_4"},{"key":"key2022020420455329900_b3","unstructured":"Denrell, J. (2005), \u201cSelection bias and the perils of benchmarking\u201d, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83 No. 1."},{"key":"key2022020420455329900_b4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lindland, O., Sindre, I. and S\u00f8lvberg, G. (1994), \u201cUnderstanding quality in conceptual modelling\u201d, IEEE Software, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 42\u20109.","DOI":"10.1109\/52.268955"}],"container-title":["Business Process Management Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/14637150610668024","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/14637150610668024\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/14637150610668024\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,25]],"date-time":"2025-07-25T00:35:53Z","timestamp":1753403753000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/bpmj\/article\/12\/3\/377-384\/256320"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"George M.","family":"Giaglis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"editor","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]]},"references-count":4,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/14637150610668024"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/14637150610668024","relation":{},"ISSN":["1463-7154"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1463-7154","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]]}}}