{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T01:47:30Z","timestamp":1762998450169,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,1]],"date-time":"2004-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1086048000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The aims of this study were to identify the retrieval features for online databases; difficulties faced by users; and retrieval features expected by users. A total of 25 databases were surveyed and 40 users were interviewed after the training sessions. Common retrieval features included Boolean operators, phrase searching, match of exact words or phrases, field specific and limit fields searches, truncation, and wildcard. Even though features are offered in many systems, their interpretation and implementation are different. Unique features included lateral searching, density and frequency of terms, reference link, and searching via table of content. The expected features included relevance feedback and term weighting other than those already offered by ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore. Such expectations were influenced by the users' background in ICT. Difficulties included application of the retrieval features in searching. Database providers must include the expected features, synonyms linked to terms in the thesaurus, and extensive search examples.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1108\/14684520410543643","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2004,7,1]],"date-time":"2004-07-01T22:06:51Z","timestamp":1088719611000},"page":"200-210","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Retrieval features for online databases: common, unique, and expected"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Roslina","family":"Othman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nor","family":"Sahlawaty Halim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b1","unstructured":"Brajnik, G., Mizzaro, S., Tasso, C. and Venuti, F. (2002), \u201cStrategic help in user interfaces for information retrieval\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 343\u201058."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b2","unstructured":"Diercks, T. (2003), \u201cDatabase evaluation report: Expanded Academic ASAP vs Academic Search Premier\u201d, available at: http:\/\/libweb\/hawaii.edu\/uhmlib\/news\/surveys\/eai_asap.htm."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b3","unstructured":"Eastman, C.M. and Jansen, B.J. (2003), \u201cCoverage, relevance, and ranking: the impact of query operators on Web search engine results\u201d, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 383\u2010411."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b4","unstructured":"Electronic Collections Committee (1993), \u201cEvaluation of UMI's Proquest Education Complete\u201d, available at: www.fcla.edu\/sulc\/ecc\/97_99\/umieval.html."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b5","unstructured":"Heidig, L. and Prior, B. (1997), \u201cAggregator interface evaluation report\u201d, available at: www.englib.cornell.edu\/cul\/a2i\/reports\/interface_eval.html."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kline, V.L. (2002), \u201cMissing links: the quest for better search tools\u201d, Online Information Review, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 252\u20105.","DOI":"10.1108\/14684520210438723"},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b7","unstructured":"Ma, W. (2002), \u201cA database selection expert system based on reference librarian's database search strategy: a usability and empirical evaluation\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 53 No. 7, pp. 567\u201080."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b8","unstructured":"Robins, D. (2000), \u201cShifts of focus on various aspects of user information problems during interactive information retrieval\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 51 No. 10, pp. 913\u201028."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b9","unstructured":"Schaffer, T. (2001), \u201cDatabases and political science research\u201d, Online Information Review, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 47\u201053."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b10","unstructured":"Shiri, A.A., Revie, C. and Chowdhury, G. (2002), \u201cThesaurus\u2010enhanced search interfaces\u201d, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 111\u201022."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shneiderman, B., Byrd, D. and Croft, W.B. (1998), \u201cSorting out searching: a user\u2010interface framework for text\u2010searches\u201d, Communication of the ACM, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 95\u20108.","DOI":"10.1145\/273035.273069"},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b12","unstructured":"Sutcliffe, A.G., Ennis, M. and Hu, J. (2000), \u201cEvaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval\u201d, Journal of Human\u2010Computer Studies, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 741\u201063."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b13","unstructured":"Tenopir, C. and Hover, K. (1993), \u201cWhen is the same database not the same? Database differences among systems\u201d, Online, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 20\u20108."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b14","unstructured":"Wolfram, D. and Xie, H. (2002), \u201cTraditional IR for Web users: a context for general audience digital libraries\u201d, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 627\u201048."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b15","unstructured":"Xie, H. (2003), \u201cSupporting ease\u2010of\u2010use and user control: desired features and structure of Web\u2010based online IR systems\u201d, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 899\u2010922."},{"key":"key2021010600120546900_b16","unstructured":"Xie, H. and Cool, C. (2000), \u201cEase of use versus user control: an evaluation of Web and non\u2010Web interfaces of online databases\u201d, Online Information Review, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 102\u201015."}],"container-title":["Online Information Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/14684520410543643","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/14684520410543643\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/14684520410543643\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,25]],"date-time":"2025-07-25T00:40:10Z","timestamp":1753404010000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/oir\/article\/28\/3\/200-210\/301928"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,1]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/14684520410543643"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/14684520410543643","relation":{},"ISSN":["1468-4527"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1468-4527"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2004,6,1]]}}}