{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T18:03:31Z","timestamp":1754157811327,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,23]],"date-time":"2007-10-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1193097600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,23]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the importance of undertaking a systemic view of information systems evaluation that augments the frequently reported prescriptive (cost\/benefit) analysis approaches.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>The paper adopts a qualitative case perspective and derives a framework for substantive information systems evaluation factors (PRISE). Three empirical formulations are considered and a comparison made to determine the content and context of the findings.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>The findings support the flexibility and relevance of PRISE as a framework for information systems evaluation. It notes the objectives, relations and components for explicitly identifying the outputs required to make a valid assessment of the systems.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Research limitations\/implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>The study is limited contextually where attention should be made not to generalise the findings beyond the empirical findings within the case analysis. Further studies may usefully include the main features of PRISE but taking into account their unique research environment.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>The study supports a practitioner perspective through a consideration of a holistic approach to information systems evaluation. Managers may implement the notion of including people, resources and benefits in their attempts to determine the added value of these systems to the organisation that extends beyond a simple financial calculation.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>The paper is highly original as the framework has been derived through both theoretical constructs and empirical analysis. It provides an innovative approach to information system evaluation that is intellectually sound and practically orientated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/17410390710830736","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,27]],"date-time":"2007-10-27T05:30:15Z","timestamp":1193463015000},"page":"700-725","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Process based information systems evaluation: towards the attributes of \u201cPRISE\u201d"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Sevgi","family":"\u00d6zkan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ray","family":"Hackney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Semih","family":"Bilgen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b1","unstructured":"Adelakun, O. (1991), Planning and Managing Strategic Information Systems Project: A Case Study on IS Quality Process in ABC, Turku Centre for Computer Science TUCS, and Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Institute of Information Systems Science, Turku."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andersson, T. and Von Hellens, L. (1997), \u201cInformation systems work quality\u201d, Information and Software Technology, Vol. 39, pp. 837\u201044.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0950-5849(97)00042-6"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang, J.C. and King, W.R. (2005), \u201cMeasuring the performance of information systems: a functional scorecard\u201d, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 85\u2010115.","DOI":"10.1080\/07421222.2003.11045833"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b11","unstructured":"Crowston, K. and Treacy, M.E. (1986), \u201cAssessing the impact of information technology on enterprise level performance\u201d, paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), San Diego, CA."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dahlberg, T. and Jarvinen, J. (1997), \u201cChallenges to IS quality\u201d, Information and Software Technology, Vol. 39, pp. 809\u201018.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0950-5849(97)00039-6"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992), \u201cInformation systems success: the quest for the dependent variable\u201d, Information Systems Research, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 60\u201095.","DOI":"10.1287\/isre.3.1.60"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2003), \u201cThe DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten\u2010year update\u201d, Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 19, pp. 9\u201030.","DOI":"10.1080\/07421222.2003.11045748"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2004), \u201cMeasuring e\u2010commerce success: applying the DeLone and McLean information systems success model\u201d, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 31\u201047.","DOI":"10.1080\/10864415.2004.11044317"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b17","unstructured":"Drucker, P.F. (1989), The New Realities, Harper & Row, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b18","unstructured":"Earl, M.J. (1989), Management Strategies for Information Technology, Prentice\u2010Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b19","unstructured":"Eccles, R.G. (1991), \u201cThe performance measurement manifesto\u201d, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 131\u20107."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eriksson, I. and T\u00f6rn, A. (1991), \u201cA model for IS quality\u201d, Software Engineering Journal, August, pp. 152\u20108.","DOI":"10.1049\/sej.1991.0018"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b22","unstructured":"Garvin, D. (1987), \u201cCompeting on the eight dimensions of quality\u201d, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 65 No. 6, pp. 101\u20109."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Irani, Z. (2006), \u201cQuantitative and qualitative approaches for information systems evaluation\u201d, European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 173 No. 3, pp. 951\u20106.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2005.06.001"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kallinikos, J. (2004), \u201cDeconstructing information packages: organisational and behavioural implications of ERP systems\u201d, Information Technology and People, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 8\u201030.","DOI":"10.1108\/09593840410522152"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mason, R.O. (1978), \u201cMeasuring information output: a communication system's approach\u201d, Information and Management, Vol. 1 No. 5, pp. 219\u201034.","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-7206(78)90028-9"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Myers, M.D. (2003), \u201cDefining the core properties of the IS discipline: not yet, not now\u201d, Communications of the AIS, No. 12, pp. 582\u20107.","DOI":"10.17705\/1CAIS.01238"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niederman, F., Brancheau, J.C. and Wetherbe, J.C. (1991), \u201cInformation systems management issues for the 1990s\u201d, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 474\u2010500.","DOI":"10.2307\/249452"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b33","unstructured":"Nolan, R.L. and McFarlan, F.W. (2005), \u201cIT and the board of directors\u201d, Harvard Business Review, October, pp. 96\u2010106."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b37","unstructured":"\u00d6zkan, S. (2004), \u201cInformation systems quality versus software quality: a process based assessment model within the context of organisation\u201d, Proceedings of the 9th Association of Information Management Conference, AIM2004."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b34","unstructured":"\u00d6zkan, S. (2005a), \u201cPB\u2010ISAM: a new framework for the assessment of information systems effectiveness\u201d, PhD thesis, Department of Information Systems, Informatics Institute, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, available at: www.ii.metu.edu.tr\/\u223csozkan\/PhDthesis.pdf."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b36","unstructured":"\u00d6zkan, S. (2005b), \u201cAll together now: merging information technology quality and other business performance management frameworks\u201d, Cutter IT Journal The Journal of Information Technology Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 16\u201020."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b38","unstructured":"\u00d6zkan, S. and Bilgen, S. (2003), \u201cNotes towards IS assessment: a comparison of two models within the context of the internet\u201d, Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference WWW\/Internet 2003, Vol. 2, pp. 1215\u20109."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b35","unstructured":"\u00d6zkan, S. and Bilgen, S. (2005), \u201cMerging information technology process quality frameworks with other business process measurement frameworks\u201d, Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation, ECITE 2005."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b41","unstructured":"Pettigrew, A. and Whipp, R. (1991), Managing Change for Competitive Success, Blackwell, Oxford."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seddon, P.B. (2002), \u201cMeasuring organizational is effectiveness: an overview and update of senior management perspectives\u201d, ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 11\u201028.","DOI":"10.1145\/513264.513270"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b46","unstructured":"Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b49","unstructured":"Vidgen, R.T., Wood\u2010Harper, A.T. and Wood, J.R.G. (1993), \u201cA soft system approach to information systems quality\u201d, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 97\u2010112."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_b50","unstructured":"Weinberg, G.M. (1992), Quality Software Management, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd1","unstructured":"Beise, C.M. (1989), \u201cAssessment of the information systems function: a study of the IS\/organizational interface\u201d, PhD dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. (1998), \u201cBeyond the productivity paradox\u201d, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 41 No. 8, pp. 49\u201055.","DOI":"10.1145\/280324.280332"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cameron, K.S. and Whetton, D.A. (1983), \u201cSome conclusions about organizational effectiveness\u201d, in Cameron, K.S. and Whetton, D.A. (Eds), Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 261\u201077.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-157180-1.50017-3"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd4","unstructured":"Chong, H. (2001), \u201cIS\u2010MBNQA: a new framework for the relationship between IS and organizational quality\u201d, PhD dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton, TX."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clark, T.D. Jr (1992), \u201cCorporate systems management: an overview and research perspective\u201d, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 60\u201075.","DOI":"10.1145\/129630.129633"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd6","unstructured":"Cortada, J.W. (1995), TQM for Information Systems Management, McGraw\u2010Hill, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cortada, J.W. (1998), \u201cFocus on the essentials\u201d, The Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 27\u201031.","DOI":"10.1108\/eb039971"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd8","unstructured":"Dickson, G.W., Wells, C.E. and Wilkes, R.B. (1988), \u201cToward a derived set of measures for assessing IS organizations\u201d, in Bjorn\u2010Anderson, N. and Davis, G.B. (Eds), Information Systems Assessment: Issues and Challenges, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 129\u201047."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd9","unstructured":"Garcia, S.M. (1999), Evolving Improvement Paradigms: Capability Maturity Models and ISO\/IEC 15504 (PDTR) SEI, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gottschalk, P. (2001), \u201cKey issues in IS management in Norway: an empirical study based on Q methodology\u201d, Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 37\u201045.","DOI":"10.4018\/irmj.2001040104"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd11","unstructured":"Hawgood, J. and Land, F. (1988), \u201cA multivalent approach to information systems assessment\u201d, in Bjorn\u2010Andersen, N. and Davis, G.B. (Eds), Information Systems Assessment: Issues and Challenges, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 103\u201024."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd12","unstructured":"Hopstaken, B.B.A. and Kranendonk, A. (1988), \u201cInformatieplanning in tweevoud\u201d, PhD thesis, Universiteit van Leiden, Leiden."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li, E.Y. (1997), \u201cPerceived importance of information system success factors: a meta analysis of group differences\u201d, Information and Management, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 15\u201028.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-7206(97)00005-0"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Myers, M.D. (1997), \u201cQualitative research in information systems\u201d, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 241\u20102.","DOI":"10.2307\/249422"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Palvia, P.C., Perkins, J.A. and Zeltmann, S.M. (1992), \u201cThe PRISM system: a key to organizational effectiveness at federal express corporation\u201d, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 277\u201092.","DOI":"10.2307\/249529"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B. and Weber, C.V. (1993), \u201cCapability maturity model for software\u201d, Version 1.1, technical report, CMU\/SEI\u201093\u2010TR\u2010024, ESC\u2010TR\u201093\u2010177.","DOI":"10.21236\/ADA263403"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saunders, C. and Jones, J. (1992), \u201cMeasuring information systems function performance\u201d, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 63\u201082.","DOI":"10.1080\/07421222.1992.11517939"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seddon, P.B. (1999), \u201cDimensions of information systems success\u201d, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 2 No. 20, pp. 1\u201039.","DOI":"10.17705\/1CAIS.00220"},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd19","unstructured":"Serafeimidis, V. (1997), \u201cInterpreting the evaluation of information systems investments: conceptual and operational explorations\u201d, PhD thesis, Department of Information Systems, London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London, London."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd20","unstructured":"Shrum, S. (2004), \u201cUpgrading from SW\u2010CMM to CMMI\u201d, white paper, , Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburgh, PA."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd21","unstructured":"Symons, V.J. (1990), \u201cEvaluation of information systems: multiple perspectives\u201d, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge."},{"key":"key2022020419540446700_frd22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Whipp, R., Rosenfeld, R. and Pettigrew, A. (1989), \u201cCulture and competitiveness: evidence from two mature UK industries\u201d, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 561\u201085.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00745.x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Enterprise Information Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/17410390710830736","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/17410390710830736\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/17410390710830736\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,25]],"date-time":"2025-07-25T00:19:11Z","timestamp":1753402751000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jeim\/article\/20\/6\/700-725\/204941"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,23]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,23]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/17410390710830736"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/17410390710830736","relation":{},"ISSN":["1741-0398"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1741-0398"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,23]]}}}