{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,25]],"date-time":"2026-06-25T15:28:28Z","timestamp":1782401308139,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":82,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,24]],"date-time":"2019-06-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561334400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AAAJ"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to explore how sustainability reporting managers (SRMs) institutionalise sustainability reporting within organisations.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>In total, 35 semi-structured interviews with SRMs in Australia and New Zealand were analysed using an institutional work perspective.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>SRMs\u2019 institutional work can be categorised into four phases with each phase representing a different approach to sustainability reporting. Organisations transition from phase one to four as they achieve a higher level of maturity and a deeper embedding and routinisation of sustainability reporting. These include educating and advocacy work undertaken by engaging with managers (phase one), transitioning to a decentralised sustainability reporting process (phase two), transitioning to leaner, focussed, materiality driven sustainability reporting (phase three), and using sustainability key performance indicators and materiality assessment reports for planning, decision-making, goal setting, performance appraisal, and incentives (phase four). However, SRMs face challenges including their inexperience, limited time and resources, lack of management commitment to sustainability reporting and low external interest in sustainability reporting. The study identifies ten reasons why material issues are not always (adequately) disclosed.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This study recommends more training and development for SRMs, and that regulation be considered to mandate the disclosure of the materiality assessments in sustainability reports.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This research extends the existing literature examining how sustainability reports are prepared and sheds further light on how a materiality assessment is undertaken. The study identifies ten reasons for the non-disclosure of material matters, including but not limited to, legitimacy motives. Researchers can use these reasons to refine their methods for evaluating published sustainability reports. At a theoretical level, the study provides four observations that institutional researchers should consider when examining forms of institutional work.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/aaaj-06-2017-2958","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,24]],"date-time":"2019-06-24T03:06:21Z","timestamp":1561345581000},"page":"1240-1269","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":106,"title":["Understanding how managers institutionalise sustainability reporting"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Muhammad Bilal","family":"Farooq","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0715-8957","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Charl","family":"de Villiers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"140","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref001","unstructured":"Accountability (2006), \u201cThe materiality report: aligning strategy, performance and reporting\u201d, available at: www.accountability.org\/about-us\/publications\/materiality.html (accessed February 17, 2014)."},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref002","unstructured":"Accountability (2008), \u201cAA1000 Accountability Principles Standard 2008\u201d, available at: www.accountability.org\/standards\/aa1000aps.html (accessed February 17, 2014)."},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref003","unstructured":"Accountability (2015), \u201cAbout us\u201d, available at: www.accountability.org\/about-us\/index.html (accessed August 25, 2015)."},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570710748535","article-title":"Engaging with organizations in persuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance","volume":"20","year":"2007","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570210418905","article-title":"Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting","volume":"15","year":"2002","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570410567791","article-title":"The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap","volume":"17","year":"2004","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1108\/18325910610690090","article-title":"The internet and change in corporate stakeholder engagement and communication strategies on social and environmental performance","volume":"2","year":"2006","journal-title":"Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1016\/j.accfor.2008.05.002","article-title":"Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices","volume":"32","year":"2008","journal-title":"Accounting Forum"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1080\/096381800407941","article-title":"A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies","volume":"9","year":"2000","journal-title":"The European Accounting Review"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570710748553","article-title":"Making a difference: sustainability reporting, accountability and organizational change","volume":"20","year":"2007","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570910923033","article-title":"Conceptualizing future change in corporate sustainability reporting","volume":"22","year":"2009","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"7","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpa.2006.04.005","article-title":"Environmental accounting as workplace activism","volume":"18","year":"2007","journal-title":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.5465\/19416520903053598","article-title":"How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship","volume":"3","year":"2009","journal-title":"The Academy of Management Annals"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570910955452","article-title":"Initiating sustainable development reporting: evidence from New Zealand","volume":"22","year":"2009","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1002\/csr.5","article-title":"Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management? A review of UK firms\u2019 social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting practices","volume":"9","year":"2002","journal-title":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management"},{"issue":"7","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpa.2010.06.020","article-title":"The absence of corporate social responsibility reporting in Bangladesh","volume":"22","year":"2011","journal-title":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570710748599","article-title":"The views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh: an engagement-based study","volume":"20","year":"2007","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1108\/20408021111162155","article-title":"Reasons for sustainability reporting by New Zealand local governments","volume":"2","year":"2011","journal-title":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal"},{"issue":"7","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1036","DOI":"10.1108\/AAAJ-04-2012-00998","article-title":"Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports","volume":"26","year":"2013","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref021","volume-title":"Successful Qualitative Research","year":"2013"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1080\/09644010802682551","article-title":"The rise of the global reporting initiative: a case of institutional entrepreneurship","volume":"18","year":"2009","journal-title":"Environmental Politics"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref023","volume-title":"Social Research Methods","year":"2012"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1108\/09513579810215455","article-title":"Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: the case of acid rain and Falconbridge","volume":"11","year":"1998","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/S1045-2354(00)90441-6","article-title":"A structuration view on the initiation of environmental reports","volume":"13","year":"2002","journal-title":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1006\/mare.1999.0119","article-title":"Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework","volume":"11","year":"2000","journal-title":"Management Accounting Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-6303.00030","article-title":"Legitimacy theory of managerial reality construction? Corporate social disclosure in Marks and Spencer PLC corporate reports, 1969-1997","volume":"24","year":"2000","journal-title":"Accounting Forum"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.7748\/nr1999.04.6.3.85.c6090","article-title":"The use of telephone interviewing for qualitative research","volume":"6","year":"1999","journal-title":"Nurse Researcher"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1177\/1468794113488126","article-title":"Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers","volume":"14","year":"2014","journal-title":"Qualitative Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570210435852","article-title":"The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures \u2013 a theoretical foundation","volume":"15","year":"2002","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref034","volume-title":"The Landscape of Qualitative Research","year":"2013"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bar.2014.03.001","article-title":"The institutionalization of corporate social responsibility reporting","volume":"46","year":"2014","journal-title":"The British Accounting Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1108\/MEDAR-07-2017-0183","article-title":"Developing a conceptual model of influences around integrated reporting, new insights and directions for future research","volume":"25","year":"2017","journal-title":"Meditari Accountancy Research"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2014.01.089","article-title":"The institutionalization of mining company sustainability disclosures","volume":"84","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of Cleaner Production"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570710748571","article-title":"Social accounting at Tradecraft plc: a struggle for the meaning of fair trade","volume":"20","year":"2007","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.2307\/2095101","article-title":"The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields","volume":"48","year":"1983","journal-title":"American Sociological Review"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1092","DOI":"10.1287\/orsc.1090.0494","article-title":"The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting","volume":"21","year":"2010","journal-title":"Organization Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.accfor.2009.04.002","article-title":"Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: why they report","volume":"33","year":"2009","journal-title":"Accounting Forum"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1108\/MEDAR-10-2016-0083","article-title":"Telephonic qualitative research interviews, when to consider them and how to do them","volume":"25","year":"2017","journal-title":"Meditari Accountancy Research"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref040","unstructured":"Fontana, A. and Frey, J. (2005), \u201cThe interview: from neutral stance to political involvement\u201d, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 695-727."},{"issue":"4","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1080\/14719037.2013.798024","article-title":"The influence of stakeholder engagement on sustainability reporting: evidence from Italian local councils","volume":"17","year":"2015","journal-title":"Public Management Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.5465\/amj.2006.20785498","article-title":"Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms","volume":"49","year":"2006","journal-title":"Academy of Management Journal"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref043","unstructured":"GRI (2013a), \u201cG4 sustainability reporting guidelines: reporting princples and standard disclosures\u201d, available at: www.globalreporting.org\/information\/g4\/Pages\/default.aspx (accessed March 1 2015)."},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref044","unstructured":"GRI (2013b), \u201cGRI G4 sustainability reporting guidelines: implementation manual\u201d, available at: www.globalreporting.org\/resourcelibrary\/GRIG4-Part2-Implementation-Manual.pdf (accessed March 1, 2015)."},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref045","unstructured":"GRI (2015), \u201cWhat is GRI\u201d, available at: www.globalreporting.org\/Information\/about-gri\/Pages\/default.aspx (accessed March 1 2015)."},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref046","volume-title":"Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method","year":"2003"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aos.2014.05.002","article-title":"Hybridized professional groups and institutional work: COSO and the rise of enterprise risk management","volume":"39","year":"2014","journal-title":"Accounting, Organizations and Society"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1021062932081","article-title":"The great interview: 25 strategies for studying people in bed","volume":"25","year":"2002","journal-title":"Qualitative Sociology"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref049","first-page":"445","article-title":"The uptake of sustainability reporting in Australia","volume":"129","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of Business Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1177\/1468794109348686","article-title":"Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note","volume":"10","year":"2010","journal-title":"Qualitative Research"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref051","unstructured":"ISA 320 (2009), \u201cInternational standard on auditing 320: materiality in planning and performing an audit\u201d, International Audit and Assurance Standards Board, available at: www.ifac.org\/system\/files\/downloads\/a018-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-320.pdf (accessed February 19 2014)."},{"issue":"1\/2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1108\/PAR-07-2013-0064","article-title":"The state of disclosures on stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting in Australian local councils","volume":"26","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pacific Accounting Review"},{"issue":"4-5","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aos.2006.09.005","article-title":"The business risk audit: origins, obstacles and opportunities","volume":"32","year":"2007","journal-title":"Accounting, Organizations and Society"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref054","unstructured":"KPMG (2011), \u201cCutting through complexity; the KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011\u201d, available at: www.kpmg.de\/docs\/Survey-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2011.pdf (accessed March 28 2018)."},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref055","unstructured":"KPMG (2017), \u201cThe road ahead: the KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017\u201d, available at: https:\/\/home.kpmg.com\/content\/dam\/kpmg\/campaigns\/csr\/pdf\/CSR_Reporting_2017.pdf (accessed March 28 2018)."},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref058","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1177\/1056492610387222","article-title":"Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization","volume":"20","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Management Inquiry"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref056","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lawrence, T.B. and Suddaby, R. (2006), \u201cInstitutions and institutional work\u201d, in Clegg, S.R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T.B. and Nord, W.R. (Eds), Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, London, pp. 215-254.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781848608030.n7"},{"issue":"8","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref057","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1177\/0170840613495305","article-title":"Institutional work: current research, new directions and overlooked issues","volume":"34","year":"2013","journal-title":"Organization Studies"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref059","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1108\/MEDAR-08-2017-0197","article-title":"Is the medium the message? Advancing the research agenda on the role of communication media in sustainability reporting","volume":"26","year":"2018","journal-title":"Meditari Accountancy Research"},{"issue":"4\/5","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref060","first-page":"349","article-title":"Institutional rationality and practice variation: new directions in institutional analysis of practice","volume":"33","year":"2008","journal-title":"Accounting, Organizations and Society"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref061","volume-title":"Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook","year":"2014","edition":"3rd ed."},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.2307\/2393853","article-title":"Business planning as pedagogy: language and control in a changing institutional field","volume":"43","year":"1998","journal-title":"Administrative Science Quarterly"},{"issue":"13","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1399","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2007.08.005","article-title":"A methodology for CSR reporting: assuring a representative diversity of indicators across stakeholders, scales, sites and performance issues","volume":"16","year":"2008","journal-title":"Journal of Clearer Production"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref063","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570210435898","article-title":"Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure; an Irish story","volume":"15","year":"2002","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref064","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aos.2004.01.001","article-title":"The construction of a social account: a case study in an overseas aid agency","volume":"30","year":"2005","journal-title":"Accounting, Organizations and Society"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref066","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1108\/09513570810854428","article-title":"Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research","volume":"21","year":"2008","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref067","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-6303.00066","article-title":"Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting","volume":"25","year":"2001","journal-title":"Accounting Forum"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref068","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-6303.t01-1-00007","article-title":"Media exposure, public policy pressure, and environmental disclosure: an examination of the impact of tri data availability","volume":"26","year":"2002","journal-title":"Accounting Forum"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref069","volume-title":"Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods","year":"2002","edition":"3rd ed."},{"issue":"3\/4","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1108\/01409171211210154","article-title":"Conducting research interviews","volume":"35","year":"2012","journal-title":"Management Research Review"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref071","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1108\/QRAM-10-2012-0047","article-title":"Accountants as institutional entrepreneurs: changing routines in a telecommunications company","volume":"11","year":"2014","journal-title":"Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref072","volume-title":"Doing Qualitative Research","year":"2013"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref073","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1002\/bse.328","article-title":"Incentives and disincentives for corporate environmental disclosure","volume":"11","year":"2002","journal-title":"Business Strategy and the Environment"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref074","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1177\/1468794107076020","article-title":"Collecting data from elites and ultra elites: telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists","volume":"7","year":"2007","journal-title":"Qualitative Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1177\/1468794104041110","article-title":"Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note","volume":"4","year":"2004","journal-title":"Qualitative Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref076","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.5465\/amr.1995.9508080331","article-title":"Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches","volume":"20","year":"1995","journal-title":"Academy of Management Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref077","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.2189\/asqu.2005.50.1.35","article-title":"Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy","volume":"50","year":"2005","journal-title":"Administrative Science Quarterly"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpa.2003.06.003","article-title":"Social and environmental reporting in the UK: a pedagogic evaluation","volume":"16","year":"2005","journal-title":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting"},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref078","unstructured":"Tolbert, P. and Zucker, L.G. (1996), \u201cThe institutionalization of institutional theory\u201d, in Clegg, S.R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T.B. and Nord, W.R. (Eds), Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, London, pp. 175-190."},{"key":"key2021041510085104000_ref079","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Unerman, J. (2007), \u201cStakeholder engagement and dialogue\u201d, in Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. and O\u2019Dwyer, B. (Eds), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Routledge, London, pp. 86-103.","DOI":"10.4324\/NOE0415384889.ch5"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1080\/0969160X.2014.965262","article-title":"Incorporating materiality considerations into analyses of absence from sustainability reporting","volume":"34","year":"2014","journal-title":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"8","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref081","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1246","DOI":"10.1108\/AAAJ-06-2012-01027","article-title":"The accounting profession\u2019s influence on academe: South African evidence","volume":"26","year":"2013","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2021041510085104000_ref082","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1108\/ARA-12-2013-0079","article-title":"Reporting on sustainability by Australian councils \u2013 a communication perspective","volume":"23","year":"2015","journal-title":"Asian Review of Accounting"}],"container-title":["Accounting, Auditing &amp; Accountability Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/AAAJ-06-2017-2958\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/AAAJ-06-2017-2958\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,25]],"date-time":"2025-07-25T00:39:43Z","timestamp":1753403983000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/aaaj\/article\/32\/5\/1240-1269\/1910"}},"subtitle":["Evidence from Australia and New Zealand"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,24]]},"references-count":82,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/AAAJ-06-2017-2958"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/aaaj-06-2017-2958","relation":{},"ISSN":["0951-3574"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0951-3574","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,24]]}}}