{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T13:27:50Z","timestamp":1761744470115,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,20]],"date-time":"2017-03-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1489968000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AJIM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,20]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>Mendeley reader counts have been proposed as early indicators for the impact of academic publications. The purpose of this paper is to assess whether there are enough Mendeley readers for research evaluation purposes during the month when an article is first published.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>Average Mendeley reader counts were compared to the average Scopus citation counts for 104,520 articles from ten disciplines during the second half of 2016.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>Articles attracted, on average, between 0.1 and 0.8 Mendeley readers per article in the month in which they first appeared in Scopus. This is about ten times more than the average Scopus citation count.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Research limitations\/implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>Other disciplines may use Mendeley more or less than the ten investigated here. The results are dependent on Scopus\u2019s indexing practices, and Mendeley reader counts can be manipulated and have national and seniority biases.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>Mendeley reader counts during the month of publication are more powerful than Scopus citations for comparing the average impacts of groups of documents but are not high enough to differentiate between the impacts of typical individual articles.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>This is the first multi-disciplinary and systematic analysis of Mendeley reader counts from the publication month of an article.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/ajim-01-2017-0028","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,3]],"date-time":"2017-05-03T06:09:28Z","timestamp":1493791768000},"page":"174-183","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"69","author":[{"given":"Mike","family":"Thelwall","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"year":"2016","first-page":"53","article-title":"Do Mendeley reader counts reflect the scholarly impact of conference papers? An investigation of computer science and engineering fields","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref001"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1021919228368","article-title":"A macro study of self-citation","volume":"56","year":"2003","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alhoori, H. and Furuta, R. (2011), \u201cUnderstanding the dynamic scholarly research needs and behavior as applied to social reference management\u201d, International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 169-178.","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref003","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-24469-8_19"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-12-2014-0176","article-title":"Geographic variation in social media metrics: an analysis of Latin American journal articles","volume":"67","year":"2015","journal-title":"Aslib Journal of Information Management"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s00799-015-0156-0","article-title":"Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey","volume":"17","year":"2016","journal-title":"International Journal on Digital Libraries"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1177\/0165551512438353","article-title":"Measuring researchers\u2019 use of scholarly information through social bookmarking data: a case study of BibSonomy","volume":"38","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Information Science"},{"unstructured":"Bosano, A. (2013), \u201cQ&A: team Mendeley joins Elsevier\u201d, available at: https:\/\/blog.mendeley.com\/2013\/04\/09\/qa-team-mendeley-joins-elsevier\/ (accessed 12 May 2017).","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref007"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.295.1.90","article-title":"The history and meaning of the journal impact factor","volume":"295","year":"2006","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref009","first-page":"461","article-title":"Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies","volume":"50","year":"2002","journal-title":"Library Trends"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.3789\/isqv25no2.2013.06","article-title":"Social signals reflect academic impact: what it means when a scholar adds a paper to Mendeley","volume":"25","year":"2013","journal-title":"Information Standards Quarterly"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-11-2013-0127","article-title":"A multidimensional analysis of Aslib proceedings \u2013 using everything but the impact factor","volume":"66","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aslib Journal of Information Management"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref012","first-page":"446","article-title":"Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage","volume":"5","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1515\/itit-2014-1048","article-title":"Tweets vs Mendeley readers: how do these two social media metrics differ?","volume":"56","year":"2014","journal-title":"IT-Information Technology"},{"unstructured":"HEFCE (2015), \u201cThe metric tide: correlation analysis of REF2014 scores and metrics\u201d, Supplementary Report II to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, HEFCE, Bristol, available at: www.hefce.ac.uk\/pubs\/rereports\/Year\/2015\/metrictide\/Title,104463,en.html (accessed 12 May 2017).","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref014"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henning, V. and Reichelt, J. (2008), \u201cMendeley \u2013 a Last.fm for research?\u201d, in van Engelen, R., Govindaraju, M. and Cafaro, M. (Eds), IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience (eScience\u201908), IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 327-328.","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref015","DOI":"10.1109\/eScience.2008.128"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvw023","article-title":"Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: the case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland","volume":"26","year":"2017","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.20744","article-title":"Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: from exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004)","volume":"59","year":"2008","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-011-0580-x","article-title":"Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement","volume":"91","year":"2012","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"11","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref019","first-page":"2140","article-title":"The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers\u2019 citations in the digital age","volume":"63","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23369","article-title":"When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals","volume":"67","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"volume-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","year":"","article-title":"How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of Mendeley reader counts for new articles","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref021"},{"unstructured":"Maleki, A. (2015), \u201cMendeley readership impact of academic articles of Iran\u201d, Proceedings of the Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI2015), Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i University Printhouse, Istanbul, pp. 109-110.","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref022"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-014-1345-0","article-title":"Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?","volume":"101","year":"2014","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"volume-title":"Appraisal of Citation Data Sources","year":"2008","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref024"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref025","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1198","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23477","article-title":"Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations","volume":"67","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"9","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref026","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1832","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23286","article-title":"Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories","volume":"66","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2016.10.003","article-title":"A longitudinal study of the bookmarking of library and information science literature in Mendeley","volume":"10","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"unstructured":"Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P. and Neylon, C. (2011), \u201cAltmetrics: a manifesto\u201d, available at: http:\/\/altmetrics.org\/manifesto (accessed 12 May 2017).","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref028"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-014-1365-9","article-title":"Comparison of downloads, citations and readership data for two information systems journals","volume":"101","year":"2014","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2015.06.005","article-title":"Predicting the long-term citation impact of recent publications","volume":"9","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1108\/00012530910932267","article-title":"Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns","volume":"61","year":"2009","journal-title":"ASLIB Proceedings"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref036","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2016.12.002","article-title":"Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation","volume":"11","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"volume-title":"Web Indicators for Research Evaluation: A Practical Guide","year":"2017","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref037"},{"key":"key2020120822492067300_ref038","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0961000615594867","article-title":"Why do papers have many Mendeley readers but few Scopus-indexed citations and vice versa?","year":"","journal-title":"Journal of Librarianship & Information Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2015.02.004","article-title":"Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles","volume":"9","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref033","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1124","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23252","article-title":"Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of Mendeley readers","volume":"66","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref034","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3036","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.2355","article-title":"Mendeley readership counts: an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences","volume":"57","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"8","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref035","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1962","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23501","article-title":"Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: an analysis of 45 fields","volume":"67","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref039","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e64841","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0064841","article-title":"Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other candidates","volume":"8","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"issue":"12","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2378","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22748","article-title":"A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science","volume":"63","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-011-0354-5","article-title":"Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis","volume":"87","year":"2011","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0775-9","article-title":"Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation","volume":"94","year":"2013","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1735-y","article-title":"Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact","volume":"105","year":"2015","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S., Jones, R., Kain, R., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M., Tinkler, J., Viney, I., Wouters, P., Hill, J. and Johnson, B. (2015), \u201cThe metric tide: report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management\u201d, available at: www.hefce.ac.uk\/pubs\/rereports\/Year\/2015\/metrictide\/Title,104463,en.html (accessed 12 May 2017).","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref044","DOI":"10.4135\/9781473978782"},{"unstructured":"Wouters, P. and Costas, R. (2012), \u201cUsers, narcissism and control: tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century\u201d, in Archambault, E., Gingras, Y. and Larivi\u00e8re, V. (Eds), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Vol. 2, Science-Metrix and OST, Montreal, pp. 487-497.","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref045"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1491","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-014-1264-0","article-title":"How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of \u2018alternative metrics\u2019 in scientific publications","volume":"101","year":"2014","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"unstructured":"Zahedi, Z., Haustein, S. and Bowman, T. (2014), \u201cExploring data quality and retrieval strategies for Mendeley reader counts\u201d, presentation at SIGMET Metrics 2014 Workshop, Seattle, WA, available at: www.slideshare.net\/StefanieHaustein\/sigme-tworkshop-asist2014 (accessed 5 November 2014).","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref047"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120822492067300_ref048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1007\/s11528-011-0467-y","article-title":"Mendeley: creating communities of scholarly inquiry through research collaboration","volume":"55","year":"2011","journal-title":"TechTrends"}],"container-title":["Aslib Journal of Information Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/AJIM-01-2017-0028\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/AJIM-01-2017-0028\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:00:14Z","timestamp":1753398014000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/ajim\/article\/69\/2\/174-183\/60590"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,20]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,20]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/AJIM-01-2017-0028"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/ajim-01-2017-0028","relation":{},"ISSN":["2050-3806"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2050-3806"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,20]]}}}