{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T17:44:18Z","timestamp":1754156658792,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,31]],"date-time":"2020-07-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1596153600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AJIM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,31]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to survey how research data are governed at repositories in Japan by deductively establishing a governance typology based on the concept of openness in the context of knowledge commons and empirically assessing the conformity of repositories to each type.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>The fuzzy-set ideal type analysis (FSITA) was adopted. For data collection, a manual assessment was conducted with all Japanese research data repositories registered on re3data.org.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>The typology constructed in this paper consists of three dimensions: openness to resources (here equal to research data), openness to a community and openness to infrastructure provision. This paper found that there is no case where all dimensions are open, and there are several cases where the resources are closed despite research data repositories being positioned as a basis for open science in Japanese science and technology policy.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>This is likely the first construction of the typology and application of FSITA to the study of research data governance based on knowledge commons. The findings of this paper provide practitioners insight into how to govern research data at repositories. The typology serves as a first step for future research on knowledge commons, for example, as a criterion of case selection in conducting in-depth case studies.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/ajim-03-2020-0072","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,29]],"date-time":"2020-07-29T05:31:31Z","timestamp":1596000691000},"page":"837-852","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["How are research data governed at Japanese repositories? A knowledge commons perspective"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"72","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5949-3610","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kai","family":"Nishikawa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1111\/spol.12128","article-title":"Diverging paths? A comparative look at childcare policies in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan","volume":"50","year":"2016","journal-title":"Social Policy and Administration"},{"issue":"8","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1241\/johokanri.48.496","article-title":"How do we work for developing real IR?: practical knowledge from the CURATOR project","volume":"48","year":"2005","journal-title":"Journal of Information Processing and Management"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref003","first-page":"1499","article-title":"Commons and growth: the essential role of open commons in market economies","volume":"80","year":"2013","journal-title":"University of Chicago Law Review"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref501","first-page":"69","article-title":"Between Spanish Huertas and the Open Road: A Tale of Two Commons?","year":"2014","journal-title":"Governing Knowledge Commons"},{"volume-title":"Governance: A Very Short Introduction","year":"2012","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref004"},{"volume-title":"Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World","year":"2015","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref005"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref502","unstructured":"Cabinet Office (2016), \u201cThe 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan\u201d, [published in Japanese], available at: https:\/\/www8.cao.go.jp\/cstp\/kihonkeikaku\/5honbun.pdf (accessed 6 March 2020)."},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref006","unstructured":"Cabinet Office (2019), \u201cIntegrated innovation strategy 2019\u201d, [published in Japanese], available at: https:\/\/www8.cao.go.jp\/cstp\/togo2019_honbun.pdf (accessed 6 March 2020)."},{"issue":"5","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1177\/0958928712456576","article-title":"Parental leave regulations and the persistence of the male breadwinner model: using fuzzy-set ideal type analysis to assess gender equality in an enlarged Europe","volume":"22","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of European Social Policy"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2761","DOI":"10.1007\/s11135-016-0423-1","article-title":"A two-step approach for the analysis of hybrids in comparative social policy analysis: a nuanced typology of childcare between policies and regimes","volume":"51","year":"2017","journal-title":"Quality and Quantity"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref009","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1177\/1065912912437162","article-title":"Putting typologies to work: concept formation, measurement, and analytic rigor","volume":"65","year":"2012","journal-title":"Political Research Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.31269\/triplec.v14i1.728","article-title":"Towards a (de) centralisation-based typology of peer production","volume":"14","year":"2016","journal-title":"TripleC"},{"year":"2012","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref011","article-title":"Comparing welfare state regimes: are typologies an ideal or realistic strategy"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0118053","article-title":"What drives academic data sharing?","volume":"10","year":"2015","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199972036.003.0001","article-title":"Governing knowledge commons","volume-title":"Governing Knowledge Commons","year":"2014"},{"volume-title":"Infrastructure: The Social Value of Shared Resources","year":"2013","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref014"},{"issue":"3859","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1243","DOI":"10.1126\/science.162.3859.1243","article-title":"The tragedy of the commons","volume":"162","year":"1968","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"1\/2","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref017","first-page":"111","article-title":"Ideas, artifacts, and facilities: information as a common-pool resource","volume":"66","year":"2003","journal-title":"Law and Contemporary Problems"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref018","first-page":"3","article-title":"Introduction: an overview of the knowledge commons","volume-title":"Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice","year":"2007"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref019","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1016\/j.polsoc.2013.10.003","article-title":"Beyond indices: the potential of fuzzy set ideal type analysis for cross-national analysis of policy outcomes","volume":"32","year":"2013","journal-title":"Policy and Society"},{"issue":"9","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref020","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/su10093181","article-title":"Towards a green state: a comparative study on OECD countries through fuzzy-set analysis","volume":"10","year":"2018","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref021","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.20651\/jslis.62.1_20","article-title":"Data sharing policies in scholarly journals across different disciplines: a comparative analysis","volume":"62","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of Japan Society of Library and Information Science"},{"article-title":"Open data practices and perceptions of researchers in Japan","year":"2019","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref022","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.15068\/00158168"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref023","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1177\/0958928716673316","article-title":"Beyond the \u2018train-first\u2019\/\u2018work-first\u2019 dichotomy: how welfare states help or hinder maternal employment","volume":"27","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of European Social Policy"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref024","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1177\/095892879900900303","article-title":"Welfare reform in the Nordic countries in the 1990s: using fuzzy-set theory to assess conformity to ideal types","volume":"9","year":"1999","journal-title":"Journal of European Social Policy"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref025","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2007.01.005","article-title":"Fuzzy set ideal type analysis","volume":"60","year":"2007","journal-title":"Journal of Business Research"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref026","first-page":"82","article-title":"Typologies of democratic systems: from political inputs to political economy","volume-title":"New Directions in Comparative Politics","year":"1991"},{"issue":"S2","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref027","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1086\/468039","article-title":"The new Chicago school","volume":"27","year":"1998","journal-title":"The Journal of Legal Studies"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref028","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.31219\/osf.io\/76g93","article-title":"Constructing commons in the cultural environment","volume":"95","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cornell Law Review"},{"issue":"793","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.31219\/osf.io\/c4x3h","article-title":"Reply: the complexity of commons","volume":"95","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cornell Law Review"},{"year":"2016","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref030","article-title":"Knowledge commons"},{"year":"2018","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref031","article-title":"Knowledge commons (2019)"},{"year":"2010","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref032","article-title":"Governance of online creation communities: provision of infrastructure for the building of digital commons"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199972036.003.0009","article-title":"Governance of online creation communities for the building of digital commons: viewed through the Framework of Institutional Analysis and Development","volume-title":"Governing Knowledge Commons","year":"2014"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref034","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.2964\/jsik_2019_037","article-title":"A theoretical consideration on the systematisation of the study of the knowledge commons","volume":"29","year":"2019","journal-title":"Japan Society of Information and Knowledge"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref035","unstructured":"Open Knowledge Foundation (2015), \u201cOpen definition 2.1\u201d, available at: https:\/\/opendefinition.org\/od\/2.1\/en\/ (accessed 6 March 2020)."},{"volume-title":"Global Open Data Index Methodology","year":"2017","author":"Open Knowledge Foundation","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref036"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref037","first-page":"41","article-title":"A framework for analysing the knowledge commons","volume-title":"Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice","year":"2007"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref038","first-page":"7","article-title":"Public goods and public choices","volume-title":"Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance","year":"1977"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref039","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0078080","article-title":"Making research data repositories visible: the re3data. org registry","volume":"8","year":"2013","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"volume-title":"Fuzzy-set Social Science","year":"2000","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref040"},{"volume-title":"Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques","year":"2009","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref041"},{"volume-title":"Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis","year":"2012","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref042"},{"volume-title":"Recommendations Concerning an Approach to Open Science that Will Contribute to Open Innovation","year":"2016","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref043"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref044","unstructured":"G8 Science Ministers (2013), \u201cG8 science Ministers statements\u201d, available at: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/g8-science-ministers-statement (accessed 6 March 2020)."},{"year":"2016","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref045","article-title":"Acommons perspective on genetic data governance: the case of BRCA data"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref046","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.1111\/isj.12191","article-title":"Enabling openness of valuable information resources: curbing data subtractability and exclusion","volume":"29","year":"2019","journal-title":"Information Systems Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref047","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1332\/030557307779657720","article-title":"States of welfare or states of workfare? Welfare state restructuring in 16 capitalist democracies, 1985\u20132002","volume":"35","year":"2007","journal-title":"Policy and Politics"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref048","first-page":"49","article-title":"\u2018Objectivity\u2019 in social science and social policy","volume-title":"The Methodology of the Social Sciences","year":"2017"},{"key":"key2020111704445996500_ref049","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160018","DOI":"10.1038\/sdata.2016.18","article-title":"Comment: the FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship","volume":"3","year":"2016","journal-title":"Scientific Data"},{"volume-title":"Open Data Barometer Leaders Edition Research Handbook","year":"2017","author":"World Wide Web Foundation","key":"key2020111704445996500_ref050"}],"container-title":["Aslib Journal of Information Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/AJIM-03-2020-0072\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/AJIM-03-2020-0072\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:00:29Z","timestamp":1753398029000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/ajim\/article\/72\/5\/837-852\/60594"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,31]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,31]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/AJIM-03-2020-0072"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/ajim-03-2020-0072","relation":{},"ISSN":["2050-3806"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2050-3806"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,31]]}}}