{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T17:46:26Z","timestamp":1754156786603,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,13]],"date-time":"2017-11-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1510531200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["DLP"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,13]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical discussion of the Leiden Manifesto for libraries already engaged in bibliometric practices. It offers practical recommendations based on the work of the European Association for Research Libraries (LIBER) Working Group on Metrics. This work is in the beginning phase and summarizes literature on the topic, as well as the experiences of the members of the Working Group. The discussion reflects today's growing popularity of (quantitative) research assessment which is seen in enthusiasts introducing new metrics (i.e. altmetrics) and by critics demanding responsible metrics that increase objectivity and equity in evaluations.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper is the result of the Working Group on Metrics of the European Association for Research Libraries (LIBER) that critically discussed the practicality of the Leiden Manifesto for libraries.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>Full compliance with the Manifesto is time-consuming, expensive and requires a significant increase in bibliometric expertise with respect to both staffing and skill level. Despite these apparent disadvantages, it is recommended that all libraries embrace the Manifesto\u2019s principles. To increase practicality, it is advised that libraries collaborate with researchers, management and other libraries at home and around the world to jointly design and provide services that can be reused within the library community.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>Libraries have increasingly been confronted with questions about research assessment, responsible metrics and the role of digital products in evaluations and funding decisions. Although a wide range of recommendations and initiatives are available (e.g. DORA San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment), many recommendations are not straightforward enough to be implemented from a library perspective. This paper provides assistance for libraries to implement these principles by acknowledging the heterogeneous backgrounds the libraries may stem from.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/dlp-01-2017-0004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,26]],"date-time":"2017-07-26T07:16:07Z","timestamp":1501053367000},"page":"324-338","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["The Leiden Manifesto under review: what libraries can learn from it"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Sarah K.","family":"Coombs","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Isabella","family":"Peters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120414401420500_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1108\/OIR-09-2015-0314","article-title":"To what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetrics","volume":"40","year":"2016","journal-title":"Online Information Review"},{"key":"key2020120414401420500_ref002","unstructured":"Cochrane, A. (2017), \u201cHow many grains of salt must we take when looking at metrics?\u201d, available at: https:\/\/scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org\/2017\/02\/08\/49186\/ (accessed 10 February 2017)."},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120414401420500_ref003","first-page":"61","article-title":"A \u2018basket of metrics\u2019-the best support for understanding journal merit","volume":"41","year":"2015","journal-title":"European Science Editing"},{"edition":"Eds","volume-title":"Scholarly Metrics Under the Microscope","year":"2016","key":"key2020120414401420500_ref004"},{"key":"key2020120414401420500_ref1a","unstructured":"Danish Research Indicator Network (FIN) (2016), Can We Implement the Leiden Manifesto Principles in Our Daily Work with Research Indicators, [online], Copenhagen University Library, Frederiksberg, available at: www.leidenmanifesto.org\/uploads\/4\/1\/6\/0\/41603901\/fin_meeting_on_leiden_manifesto__report_march_7_2016.pdf (accessed 22 December 2016)."},{"key":"key2020120414401420500_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2777\/061652","volume-title":"Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World - A Vision for Europe. DG Research and Innovation","author":"EC","year":"2016","edition":"1st ed."},{"key":"key2020120414401420500_ref006","unstructured":"Gornitzki, C. (2015), \u201cThe Leiden manifesto - ten principles for a better research evaluation\u201d, available at: https:\/\/kib.ki.se\/en\/whatsup\/blog\/leiden-manifesto-ten-principles-better-research-evaluation (accessed 10 February 2017)."},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020120414401420500_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.3145\/epi.2016.nov.07","article-title":"Individual bibliometric assessment at university of Vienna: from numbers to multidimensional profiles","volume":"25","year":"2016","journal-title":"El Profesional de la Informaci\u00f3n"},{"issue":"7548","key":"key2020120414401420500_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1038\/520429a","article-title":"Bibliometrics: the Leiden manifesto for research metrics","volume":"520","year":"2015","journal-title":"Nature"},{"volume-title":"Altmetrics for Information Professionals. Past, Present and Future","year":"2016","key":"key2020120414401420500_ref009"},{"key":"key2020120414401420500_ref010","unstructured":"Konkiel, S. (2016), \u201cAltmetrics for librarians: 100 + tips, tricks, and examples\u201d, available at: www.altmetric.com\/libraries-ebook (accessed 10 February 2017)."},{"key":"key2020120414401420500_ref011","unstructured":"NISO (2016), \u201cNISO RP-25-2016: outputs of the NISO alternative assessment project\u201d, available at: www.niso.org\/publications\/rp\/rp-25-2016\/ (accessed 10 February 2017)."},{"key":"key2020120414401420500_ref012","unstructured":"Pickton, M. (2015), \u201cThe metric tide: are you using bibliometrics responsibly?\u201d, Available at: https:\/\/researchsupporthub.northampton.ac.uk\/2015\/12\/09\/the-metric-tide-are-you-using-bibliometrics-responsibly\/ (accessed 10 February 2017)."},{"key":"key2020120414401420500_ref013","unstructured":"Piwowar, H. (2012), \u201c31 Flavors of research impact through #Altmetrics\u201d, available at: https:\/\/researchremix.wordpress.com\/2012\/01\/31\/31-flavours\/ (accessed 10 February 2017)."},{"key":"key2020120414401420500_ref014","unstructured":"Priem, J. Taraborelli, D. Groth, P. and Neylon, C. (2010), \u201cAltmetrics: a manifesto\u201d, available at: http:\/\/altmetrics.org\/manifesto (accessed 10 February 2017)."},{"edition":"1st ed.","volume-title":"Meaningful Metrics","year":"2015","key":"key2020120414401420500_ref015"},{"issue":"11","key":"key2020120414401420500_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e47523","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0047523","article-title":"How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, twitter mentions, and citations","volume":"7","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"edition":"Ed.","volume-title":"Altmetrics: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Researchers and Academics","year":"2016","key":"key2020120414401420500_ref017"},{"key":"key2020120414401420500_ref018","unstructured":"Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E. and Johnson, B. (2015), The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, doi: 10.13140\/RG.2.1.4929.1363."}],"container-title":["Digital Library Perspectives"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/DLP-01-2017-0004\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/DLP-01-2017-0004\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:09:45Z","timestamp":1753398585000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/dlp\/article\/33\/4\/324-338\/256676"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,13]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,13]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/DLP-01-2017-0004"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/dlp-01-2017-0004","relation":{},"ISSN":["2059-5816"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2059-5816"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,13]]}}}