{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,12]],"date-time":"2026-04-12T15:45:22Z","timestamp":1776008722050,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1996,4,1]],"date-time":"1996-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":828316800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1996,4,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The principal aim of this study is to examine the transmission of ideas across time in disciplines selected from the humanities and social sciences. Citation analysis is used to trace the diffusion of ideas as they are embodied in monographic publications. The study is part of a developing research programme and is intended to establish a framework to inform future developments. Four specific hypotheses are developed and tested. They are concerned with: the relative impact of monographs and journal articles produced within a discipline; the distinction between core and non\u2010core group monographs; the correlation between the reception and intellectual survival of a monograph; and the comparative level of impact of monographic and journal article publication by a single author. It is concluded that the presence of core or elite groups can be perceived in all aspects of the study. The validity of the methodologies employed is strengthened by the sharp distinctions between groups of monographs and of authors revealed by the analysis of data. Further analysis is needed to explore intra\u2010 and inter\u2010disciplinary diffusion of ideas over time in greater depth.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1108\/eb026972","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,1,19]],"date-time":"2008-01-19T07:23:01Z","timestamp":1200727381000},"page":"389-404","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":55,"title":["THE ROLE OF MONOGRAPHS IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF PHILOSOPHY, SOCIOLOGY AND ECONOMICS"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"52","author":[{"given":"YLVA","family":"LINDHOLM\u2010ROMANTSCHUK","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"JULIAN","family":"WARNER","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"p_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/eb026940"},{"key":"p_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/016555159502100109"},{"key":"p_3","volume-title":"Evaluative bibliometrics: the use ofpublication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity","author":"NARIN F.","year":"1976"},{"key":"p_4","volume-title":"The sociology of science","author":"MERTON R.","year":"1973"},{"key":"p_5","volume-title":"Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society","author":"LATOUR B.","year":"1987"},{"key":"p_6","volume-title":"Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science","author":"BAZERMAN C.","year":"1988"},{"key":"p_7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02017064"},{"key":"p_8","volume-title":"London and Connecticut: Greenwood Press","author":"WILSON P.","year":"1983"},{"key":"p_9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02019161"},{"key":"p_10","unstructured":"LINDHOLM-ROMANTSCHUK, Y. The flow of ideas within and among academic disciplines: scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and the humanities. PhD dissertation,University of Californiaat Berkeley,1994."},{"key":"p_11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02017065"},{"key":"p_12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.4630290504"},{"key":"p_13","volume-title":"Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities","author":"CRANE D.","year":"1972"},{"key":"p_14","volume-title":"Diffusion of innovations","author":"ROGERS E.M.","year":"1983","edition":"3"},{"key":"p_15","volume-title":"The Foucault reader.","author":"FOUCAULT M.","year":"1984"},{"key":"p_16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(198909)40:5<342::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-U"},{"key":"p_17","volume-title":"the report of the National Enquiry. Baltimore and","year":"1979"},{"key":"p_18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02016675"},{"key":"p_19","volume-title":"Rhetoric in the human sciences.","author":"SIGNORILE","year":"1989"},{"key":"p_20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<628::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-0"},{"key":"p_21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/016555159502100104"},{"key":"p_22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/030631291021003003"},{"key":"p_23","volume-title":"Towards the improvement of social science information systems: overview of research carried out 1971-1975","author":"BATH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY.","year":"1980"}],"container-title":["Journal of Documentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/eb026972\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/eb026972\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:11:49Z","timestamp":1753398709000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jd\/article\/52\/4\/389-404\/204536"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1996,4,1]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1996,4,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/eb026972"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/eb026972","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-0418"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-0418","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1996,4,1]]}}}