{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,10]],"date-time":"2026-02-10T18:23:14Z","timestamp":1770747794763,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,1]],"date-time":"2016-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1470009600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["EL"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The aim of this paper was to compare university students\u2019 preferences for searching the library catalogue via the library\u2019s Koha online public access catalogue (OPAC) or its discovery tool VuFind.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>A total of 175 students responded to a questionnaire-based survey through which their demographic data, duration (years) of computer use and their self-reported levels of computer skills were obtained. Students were asked what interfaces they use for catalogue searching and to rate their opinion on the relevant interfaces on a seven-point Likert scale. Mann\u2013Whitney and Kruskal\u2013Wallis tests were conducted to statistically compare the differences between students\u2019 demographic\/individual characteristics and their ratings on the respective interfaces. For those students who used both systems, differences between their Likert ratings were assessed using a one-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The results showed that there were no significant differences among students in terms of their ratings on either the OPAC or VuFind interfaces. Wilcoxon signed ranks test indicated that significantly more students thought that VuFind was more usable than the Koha OPAC.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This is a pioneering study of the current use of the OPAC and discovery tools by university students and their preferences for searching catalogue information through these systems. It is hoped that the findings of this study will encourage researchers to conduct task-based usability studies with various cataloguing tools and this could yield new and improved interaction designs for library catalogue searching.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/el-07-2015-0139","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,2]],"date-time":"2016-08-02T04:31:46Z","timestamp":1470112306000},"page":"683-695","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Preference of Bangladesh university students for searching the library catalogue"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Shamima","family":"Yesmin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"S.M. Zabed","family":"Ahmed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1108\/14678040910949666","article-title":"Measuring service quality of a public university library in Bangladesh using SERVQUAL","volume":"10","year":"2009","journal-title":"Performance Measurement and Metrics"},{"key":"key2020121400085026300_ref002","unstructured":"Association of Research Libraries (ARL) (2001), Portal Applications in Research Libraries: ARL Scholars Portal Working Group Report May 2001, available at: http:\/\/old.arl.org\/resources\/pubs\/portals\/report-may-01\u223cprint.shtml (accessed 31 July 2015)."},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(198611)37:6<387::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-8","article-title":"Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information retrieval studies","volume":"37","year":"1986","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science"},{"issue":"7","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(199607)47:7<493::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-P","article-title":"Why are online catalogs still hard to use?","volume":"47","year":"1996","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science"},{"key":"key2020121400085026300_ref005","unstructured":"Breeding, M. (2007), \u201cNext-generation library catalogs\u201d, Library Technology Reports, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 5-14."},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1108\/07378831111138189","article-title":"Usability testing of VuFind at an academic library","volume":"29","year":"2011","journal-title":"Library Hi Tech"},{"key":"key2020121400085026300_ref007","unstructured":"Digital Library Federation (DLF) ILS Discovery Interface Task Force (2008), \u201cDLF ILS Discovery Interface Task Force (ILS-DI) Technical Recommendation: an API for achieving effective interoperation between traditional integrated library systems and external discovery applications\u201d, available at: https:\/\/project.library.upenn.edu\/confluence\/download\/attachments\/5963787\/DLF_ILS_Discovery-April08_draft.pdf (accessed 31 July 2015)."},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref008","first-page":"44","article-title":"On-line catalog user acceptance survey","volume":"20","year":"1980","journal-title":"RQ"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.6017\/ital.v29i2.3144","article-title":"Usability studies of faceted browsing: a literature review","volume":"29","year":"2010","journal-title":"Information Technology and Libraries"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref010","first-page":"84","article-title":"The CLR public online catalog study: an overview","volume":"1","year":"1982","journal-title":"Information Technology and Libraries"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1108\/02640470510611526","article-title":"OPAC usability: assessment through verbal protocol","volume":"23","year":"2005","journal-title":"The Electronic Library"},{"key":"key2020121400085026300_ref012","first-page":"232","article-title":"Online public access catalogs","volume-title":"Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST)","year":"1985"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref013","first-page":"52","article-title":"The use and understanding of keyword searching in a university online catalog","volume":"16","year":"1997","journal-title":"Information Technology and Libraries"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1108\/07378831211239942","article-title":"\u2018Discovering\u2019 what\u2019s changed: a revisit of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries","volume":"30","year":"2012","journal-title":"Library Hi Tech"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1177\/0266382113512404","article-title":"Developing a service performance assessment system to improve service quality of academic libraries","volume":"30","year":"2013","journal-title":"Business Information Review"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1108\/14678041111196631","article-title":"Measuring Dhaka University students\u2019 perceptions of ease-of-use and their satisfaction with university library\u2019s online public access catalog","volume":"12","year":"2011","journal-title":"Performance Measurement and Metrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref017","first-page":"59","article-title":"Usability test results for Encore in an academic library","volume":"32","year":"2013","journal-title":"Information Technology and Libraries"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1108\/07419051111173883","article-title":"Effect of web searching on the OPAC: a comparison of selected university libraries","volume":"28","year":"2011","journal-title":"Library Hi Tech News"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/S0740-8188(97)90039-6","article-title":"OPACs: a research review","volume":"19","year":"1997","journal-title":"Library and Information Science Research"},{"key":"key2020121400085026300_ref020","first-page":"35","article-title":"Using search engine technology to improve library catalogs","volume-title":"Advances in Librarianship","year":"2010"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1108\/00330331311313726","article-title":"Open source solutions for libraries: ABCD vs Koha","volume":"47","year":"2013","journal-title":"Program"},{"key":"key2020121400085026300_ref022","unstructured":"UGC (2013), Annual Report 2013, available at: www.ugc.gov.bd\/reports\/ (accessed 31 July 2015)."},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020121400085026300_ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1108\/07378831011096312","article-title":"Evaluating and comparing discovery tools: how close are we towards next generation catalog?","volume":"28","year":"2010","journal-title":"Library Hi Tech"}],"container-title":["The Electronic Library"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/EL-07-2015-0139","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/EL-07-2015-0139\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/EL-07-2015-0139\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,25]],"date-time":"2025-07-25T01:07:39Z","timestamp":1753405659000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/el\/article\/34\/4\/683-695\/91184"}},"subtitle":["OPAC or discovery tool?"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,1]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/EL-07-2015-0139"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/el-07-2015-0139","relation":{},"ISSN":["0264-0473"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0264-0473","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,1]]}}}