{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T10:17:48Z","timestamp":1777630668457,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]],"date-time":"2019-11-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1574035200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["ITSE"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The purpose of this study is to compare the overall usability and user experience of desktop computers and mobile-devices when used in a summative assessment in the context of a higher education course.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The study follows a between-groups design. The participants were 110 first-year undergraduate students from a European university. Students in the experimental group participated in the assessment using mobile devices, whereas students in the control group participated using desktop computers. After the assessment, students self-reported their experiences with computer-based assessment (CBA) and mobile-based assessment (MBA), respectively. The instruments used were the user experience questionnaire and the system usability scale.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Attractiveness and novelty were reported significantly higher in the experimental group (MBA), while no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of efficiency, perspicuity, dependability and stimulation. The overall score for the system usability was not found to differ between the two conditions.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The usability and user experience issues discussed in this study can inform educators and policymakers about the potential of using mobile devices in online assessment practices, as an alternative to desktop computers.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The study is novel, in that it provides quantitative evidence for the usability and user experience of both desktop computers and mobile devices when used in a summative assessment in the context of a higher education course. Study findings can contribute towards the interchangeable usage of desktop computers and mobile devices in assessment practices in higher education.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/itse-01-2019-0003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,19]],"date-time":"2019-08-19T05:11:42Z","timestamp":1566191502000},"page":"381-391","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["A comparative study between a computer-based and a mobile-based assessment"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Stavros A.","family":"Nikou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Anastasios A.","family":"Economides","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref001","first-page":"1","article-title":"A study on the usage of mobile devices in collaborative environments vs desktops: an approach based on flow experience","volume-title":"International Conference on e-Business (ICE-B)","year":"2010"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref002","first-page":"1","article-title":"A comparison of performance and preference on mobile devices vs. desktop computers","volume-title":"IEEE 7th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)","year":"2016"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1080\/10447310802205776","article-title":"An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale","volume":"24","year":"2008","journal-title":"International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref007","first-page":"37","article-title":"Available guidelines and standards for psychometric tests and test users","volume-title":"Towards a Research Agenda on Computer-Based Assessment. Challenges and Needs for European Educational Measurement","year":"2008"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sbspro.2013.06.019","article-title":"Producing and introducing mobile books, as a new model of providing learning content in medical sciences","volume":"83","year":"2013","journal-title":"Procedia \u2013 Social and Behavioral Sciences"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref009","first-page":"189","article-title":"SUS: a \u2018quick and dirty\u2019 usability scale","volume-title":"Usability Evaluation in Industry","year":"1996"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1080\/01449290410001669923","article-title":"Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones","volume":"23","year":"2004","journal-title":"Behaviour and Information Technology"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref011","first-page":"117","article-title":"A Meta-analytical review of empirical mobile usability studies","volume":"6","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Usability Studies"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0007-1013.2004.00390.x","article-title":"Improving the quality and effectiveness of computer mediated instruction through usability evaluations","volume":"35","year":"2004","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.2307\/249008","article-title":"Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology","volume":"13","year":"1989","journal-title":"MIS Quarterly"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref014","article-title":"Implementing computer-based assessment \u2013 A web-based mock examination changes attitudes","volume":"58","year":"2012","journal-title":"Computers and Education"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1504\/IJMLO.2010.033553","article-title":"Mobiles in education: students' usage, preferences and desires","volume":"4","year":"2010","journal-title":"International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref016","first-page":"1247","article-title":"Impact of screen size on performance, awareness, and user satisfaction with adaptive graphical user interfaces","year":"2008"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2014.07.008","article-title":"A comparison of difficulties in instructional design processes: mobile vs. desktop","volume":"39","year":"2014","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref018","unstructured":"ISO 9241-11:2018 (2018), \u201cErgonomics of human-system interaction \u2014 part 11: usability: definitions and concepts\u201d, available at: www.iso.org\/obp\/ui\/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref019","unstructured":"ISO 9241-210:2010 (2010), \u201cErgonomics of human-system interaction \u2014 part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems\u201d, available at: www.iso.org\/obp\/ui\/#iso:std:iso:9241:-210:ed-1:v1:en"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref020","volume-title":"NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition","year":"2016"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.19173\/irrodl.v13i3.1221","article-title":"Using self-efficacy to assess the readiness of nursing educators and students for mobile learning","volume":"13","year":"2012","journal-title":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning"},{"issue":"8","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2015.1064658","article-title":"Measuring the usability of mobile applications for phones and tablets","volume":"31","year":"2015","journal-title":"International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s40692-017-0093-6","article-title":"Usability of mobile learning applications: a systematic literature review","volume":"5","year":"2018","journal-title":"Journal of Computers in Education"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref023","first-page":"63","article-title":"Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire","volume-title":"Usab 2008, Lncs","year":"2008"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref024","first-page":"1","article-title":"External barriers affecting the successful implementation of mobile educational interventions","year":"2018","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"issue":"(Part B)","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref003","first-page":"1241","article-title":"The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students\u2019 science motivation and achievement","volume":"55","year":"2016","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2017.02.005","article-title":"Mobile-based assessment: investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use","volume":"109","year":"2017","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2018.06.006","article-title":"Mobile-based assessment: a literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018","volume":"125","year":"2018","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref025","article-title":"Using information scent to understand mobile and desktop web search behaviour","volume-title":"Proceedings SIGIR\u201917, Shinjuku","year":"2017"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref026","article-title":"Access moodle using smart mobile phones. A case study in a Greek university","volume-title":"Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. ArtsIT 2017, DLI 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering","year":"2018"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref027","article-title":"Mobile and computer-based talent assessments: implications of workload and usability","volume-title":"Computer-Human Interaction","year":"2014"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref028","first-page":"127","article-title":"Does size matter? Investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users' perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency","year":"2013"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1002\/cae.20242","article-title":"Using mobile and Web-Based computerized tests to evaluate university students","volume":"17","year":"2009","journal-title":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref030","article-title":"SUStisfied? Little-known system usability scale facts. User experience","volume":"10","year":"2011","journal-title":"The Magazine of the User Experience Professionals Association"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref031","volume-title":"Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research","year":"2016"},{"key":"key2019092309554096200_ref032","unstructured":"Schrepp, M. (2018), \u201cUser experience questionnaire handbook version 6 (16.09.2018)\u201d, available at: www.ueq-online.org"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2010.11.017","article-title":"The acceptance and use of computer based assessment","volume":"56","year":"2011","journal-title":"Computers and Education"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2019092309554096200_ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.4018\/jmbl.2009040104","article-title":"Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: a 3-level evaluation framework","volume":"1","year":"2009","journal-title":"International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning"}],"container-title":["Interactive Technology and Smart Education"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/ITSE-01-2019-0003\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/ITSE-01-2019-0003\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T21:56:31Z","timestamp":1753394191000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/itse\/article\/16\/4\/381-391\/180551"}},"subtitle":["Usability and user experience"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/ITSE-01-2019-0003"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/itse-01-2019-0003","relation":{},"ISSN":["1741-5659","1741-5659"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1741-5659","type":"print"},{"value":"1741-5659","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]]}}}