{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]],"date-time":"2026-01-23T08:58:57Z","timestamp":1769158737418,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,16]],"date-time":"2015-11-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1447632000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,16]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u2013 The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors which might affect the intention to use interactive whiteboards (IWBs) by university students, using Technology Acceptance Model by the structural equation modeling approach. The following hypothesis guided the current study:<jats:italic>H1.<\/jats:italic>There is a positive relationship between IWB self-efficacy and perceived learning (PL).<jats:italic>H2.<\/jats:italic>There is a positive relationship between IWB self-efficacy and perceived ease of use (PEOU).<jats:italic>H3.<\/jats:italic>There is a positive relationship between IWB self-efficacy and perceived usefulness (PU).<jats:italic>H4.<\/jats:italic>There is a positive relationship between PL and PEOU.<jats:italic>H5.<\/jats:italic>There is a positive relationship between PL and PU. H6. There is a positive relationship between PEOU and attitude.<jats:italic>H7.<\/jats:italic>There is a positive relationship between PU and attitude.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u2013 A survey method was used to collect the data. Purposive sampling was used, and 416 high-school students participated in the current study. Descriptive statistics and structural equation model conducted to test the proposed model were used in data analysis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u2013 All hypotheses formulated within the scope of the research model were statistically confirmed.<jats:italic>H1<\/jats:italic>, which assumed that interactive whiteboard self-efficacy (IWBSE) have had a positive impact on PL, was found to be statistically significant. The impact of IWBSE on PL was 0.61 which means that if IWBSE increases one unit, the impact on PL will be an average of 0.61 points. The relationship between IWBSE, which is expressed in<jats:italic>H2<\/jats:italic>and<jats:italic>H3<\/jats:italic>, and, respectively, PEOU and PU latent variables, was statistically significant. IWBSE mostly affected PEOU (= 0.51,<jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>= 7.92), and then PU (= 0.16,<jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>= 2.43). The relationship between PL \u2013 which is expressed in<jats:italic>H4<\/jats:italic>and<jats:italic>H5<\/jats:italic>\u2013 and, respectively, PEOU and PU latent variables, was statistically significant. IWBSE mostly affected PU (= 0.63,<jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>= 7.94), and then PEOU (= 0.27,<jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>= 3.95).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u2013 It is aimed to transform the entire classes into computerized classes (Smart Class) around Turkey with FATIH project which includes usage of interactive boards. Because it is a very big project funded by the government, it is important to evaluate its adaptation among teachers and students. Therefore, the current study aims to investigate the factors which might affect the attitude to use IWBs by high-school students.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/itse-05-2015-0011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,17]],"date-time":"2015-11-17T04:38:15Z","timestamp":1447735095000},"page":"285-297","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Learning with interactive whiteboards"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Eylem","family":"Kilic","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"\u00c7etin","family":"G\u00fcler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H. Eray","family":"\u00c7elik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cemal","family":"Tatli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b1","unstructured":"Aksoy, H.H. (2003), \u201cE\u011fitim kurumlar\u0131nda teknoloji kullan\u0131m\u0131 ve etkilerine ili\u015fkin bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmleme\u201d, EE\u011fitimitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi , Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 4-23."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashfield, J. and Wood, R. (2008), \u201cThe use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: a case study\u201d, British Journal of Educational Technology , Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 84-96.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2007.00699.x"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b3","unstructured":"Avc\u0131-Yucel, U. and Gulbahar, Y. (2013), \u201cTechnology acceptance model: a review of the prior predictors Ankara University\u201d, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences , Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 89-109."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b4","unstructured":"Bandura, A. (1986), Social Functions of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beauchamp, G. (2004), \u201cTeacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: towards an effective transition framework\u201d, Technology, Pedagogy and Education , Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 327-348.","DOI":"10.1080\/14759390400200186"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b6","unstructured":"Beeland, W.D. (2002), \u201cStudent engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive whiteboards help?\u201d, Action Research Exchange , Vol. 1 No. 1."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b7","unstructured":"Byrne, M.B. (1998), Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, NJ."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Caspi, A. and Blau, I. (2008), \u201cSocial presence in online discussion groups: testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning\u201d, Social Psychology of Education , Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 323-346.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11218-008-9054-2"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b9","unstructured":"Celik, H.E. (2009), \u201cStructural equation modeling and an application: extended online commerce acceptance model\u201d, Unpublished PhD thesis, Eski\u015fehir Osmangazi University, Natural Sciences, Eski\u015fekir, Turkey."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b10","unstructured":"Cogill, J. (2001), \u201cWhat are the effects on teaching with an interactive whiteboard in a primary school?\u201d, available at: www.juliecogill.com\/html\/thesis_papers.htm (accessed 9 October 2013)."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis, F.D. (1989), \u201cPerceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology\u201d, MIS Quarterly , Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-340.","DOI":"10.2307\/249008"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b12","unstructured":"Dillenbourg, P. (1999), \u201cIntroduction: what do you mean by \u2018collaborative learning\u2019?\u201d, in Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , Pergamon Press, New York, NY, pp. 1-19."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b14","unstructured":"Elaziz, M.F. (2008), Attitudes of Students and Teachers Towards the Use of Interactive Whiteboards in efl Classrooms. Y\u00fcksek Lisans Tezi, Yabanc\u0131 Dil Olarak \u0130ngilizce \u00d6\u011fretimi B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc , Bilkent \u00dcniversite, T\u00fcrkiye."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. (1981), \u201cEvaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error\u201d, Journal of Marketing Research , Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.","DOI":"10.1177\/002224378101800104"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b16","unstructured":"Geer, R. and Barnes, A. (2007), \u201cCognitive concomitants of interactive board use and their relevance to developing effective research methodologies\u201d, International Education Journal , Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 92-102."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gillen, J. , Kleine, S.J. , Littleton, K. , Mercer, N. and Twiner, A. (2007), \u201cA learning revolution? Investigating pedagogic practices around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms\u201d, Learning, Media and Technology , Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 243-256.","DOI":"10.1080\/17439880701511099"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b18","unstructured":"Gillien, J. , Staarman, J.K. , Littleton, K. , Mercer, N. and Twiner, A. (2006), \u201cA learning revolution? Investigating pedagogic practices around \u0131nteractive whiteboards \u0131n British primary classrooms\u201d, AERA Conference 2006, San Francisco, CA."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b19","unstructured":"Glover, D. , Miller, D. and Averis, D. (2003), The \u0131mpact of \u0131nteractive Whiteboards on Classroom Practice: Examples Drawn from the Teaching of Mathematics in Secondary Schools in England , The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project, Brmo, Czech Republic."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hayduk, L.A. (1987), Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances , John Hopkins, Baltimore.","DOI":"10.56021\/9780801834783"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b20","unstructured":"Hillier, E. , Beauchamp, G. and Whyte, S. (2013), \u201cA study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings: a European perspective from the iTILT project\u201d, Educational Futures , Vol. 5 No. 2."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Igbaria, M. and T. Guimaraes, and G. Davis. (1995), \u201cTesting the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model\u201d, Journal of Management Information Systems , Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 87-114.","DOI":"10.1080\/07421222.1995.11518061"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b22","unstructured":"Joreskog, K. and Sorbom, D. (2001), LISREL 8: User\u2019s Reference Guide , Scien-tific Software International, Chicago, IL."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7, E. and G\u00f6kda\u015f, \u0130. (2014), \u201cLearning through blogging: use of blogs to enhance the perceived learning of pre-service ICT teachers educational sciences\u201d, Theory & Practice , Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 1-9. doi: 10.12738\/estp.2014.3.1987.","DOI":"10.12738\/estp.2014.3.1987"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"King, W. and He, J. (2006), \u201cA meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model\u201d, Information & Management , Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 740-755.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.im.2006.05.003"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"LaPointe, D.K. and Gunawardena, C.N. (2004), \u201cDeveloping, testing and refining of a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer-mediated conferencing\u201d, Distance Education , Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 83-106.","DOI":"10.1080\/0158791042000212477"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Legris, P. , Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. (2003), \u201cWhy do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model\u201d, Information & Management , Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 191-204.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-7206(01)00143-4"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b29","unstructured":"Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994), Psychometric Theory , McGraw-Hill, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b30","unstructured":"Pamuk, S. , \u00c7ak\u0131r, R. , Ergun, M, Y\u0131lmaz, H.B. and ve Ayas, C. (2013), \u201cTeachers and students\u2019 views in use of interactive whiteboard and tablet pc: evaluation of FATIH project\u201d, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice , Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 1799-1822."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paragin\u0103, F. , Paragin\u0103, S. and Jipa, A. (2010), \u201cInteractive whiteboards in Romania\u201d, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences , Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 4059-4063.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sbspro.2010.03.640"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b32","unstructured":"Park, S.Y. (2009), \u201cAn analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students\u2019 behavioral intention to use E-learning\u201d, Educational Technology & Society , Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 150-162."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b33","unstructured":"Ramayah, T. and Ignatius, J. (2005), \u201cImpact of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived enjoyment on intention to shop online\u201d, ICFAI Journal of Systems Management (IJSM) , Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 36-51."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b34","unstructured":"Schermelleh-Engel, K. , Moosbrugger, H. and M\u00fcller, H. (2003), \u201cEvaluating the fit of structural equation models: test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures\u201d, Methods of Psychological Research \u2013 Online , Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 23-74."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b35","unstructured":"Shen, C.C. and Chuang, H.M. (2010), \u201cExploring users\u2019 attitudes and intentions toward the interactive whiteboard technology environment\u201d, International Review on Computers and Software (I.RE.CO.S.) , Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 200-208."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shenton, A. and Pagett, L. (2008), \u201cFrom \u2018bored\u2019 to screen: the use of the interactive whiteboard for literacy in six primary classrooms in England\u201d, Literacy , Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 129-136.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9345.2007.00475.x"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stoel, L. and Lee, K.H. (2003), \u201cModelling the effect of experience on student acceptance of web-based courseware\u201d, Internet Research, Electronic Networking Applications and Policy , Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 364-374.","DOI":"10.1108\/10662240310501649"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b38","unstructured":"\u0160umak, B. , Heri\u010dko, M. , Pu\u0161nik, M. and Polan\u010di\u010d, P. (2011), \u201cFactors affecting acceptance and use of moodle: an empirical study based on TAM\u201d, Informatica , Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 91-100."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b39","unstructured":"Tatli, C. and K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7, E. (2013), \u201cEvaluation of inservice training related to usage of interactive white boards based on teachers perception\u201d, The Journal of Educational Sciences and Practice , Vol. 12 No. 24, pp. 137-158."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T\u00fcrel, Y.K. (2011), \u201cAn interactive whiteboard student survey: development, validity and reliability\u201d, Computers & Education , Vol. 57 No. 4, pp. 2441-2450.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2011.07.005"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b41","unstructured":"T\u00fcrel, Y.K. (2012), \u201cTeachers\u2019 negative attitudes towards \u0131nteractive whiteboard use: needs and problems\u201d, Elementary Education Online , Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 423-439."},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T\u00fcrel, Y.K. and Demirli, C. (2010), \u201cInstructional \u0131nteractive whiteboard materials: designers\u2019 perspectives\u201d, Procedia \u2013 Social and Behavioral Sciences , Vol. 9, pp. 1437-1442, doi: 10.1016\/j.sbspro.2010.12.346.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sbspro.2010.12.346"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_b43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Venkatesh, V. (2000), \u201cDeterminants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, and emotion into the technology acceptance model\u201d, Information Systems Research , Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 343-365.","DOI":"10.1287\/isre.11.4.342.11872"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_frd1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1999), \u201cExtending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs\u201d, Information and Management , Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 9-21.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-7206(98)00101-3"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_frd2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee, B.C. , Yoon, J.O. and Lee, I. (2009), \u201cLearners\u2019 acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: theories and results\u201d, Computers & Education , Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 1320-1329.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2009.06.014"},{"key":"key2020121922203310500_frd3","unstructured":"Milli E\u011fitim Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (2013), \u201cFATIH Projesi\u201d, available at: http:\/\/fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr\/tr\/icerikincele.php?id=6 (accessed 24 May 2014)."}],"container-title":["Interactive Technology and Smart Education"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/ITSE-05-2015-0011","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/ITSE-05-2015-0011\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/ITSE-05-2015-0011\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T21:56:40Z","timestamp":1753394200000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/itse\/article\/12\/4\/285-297\/174817"}},"subtitle":["Determining the factors on promoting interactive whiteboards to students by Technology Acceptance Model"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,16]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,16]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/ITSE-05-2015-0011"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/itse-05-2015-0011","relation":{},"ISSN":["1741-5659"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1741-5659","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,16]]}}}