{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,18]],"date-time":"2025-10-18T15:19:56Z","timestamp":1760800796442,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>ChatGPT and Gemini stand out as prominent artificial intelligence (AI) platforms with a substantial user base. These platforms are being widely used across different domains owing to their versatility. Learning is an integral part of human development. So far, no studies have been conducted to explore the use of AI in this domain, particularly, self-learning. The purpose of this study is to investigate Gemini and ChatGPT\u2019s usability in the context of self-learning. This study also seeks to compare the effectiveness of these two systems\u2019 self-learning features.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This study involves a comparative assessment of two Generative AIbots: ChatGPT and Gemini. Three concepts were selected to be learnt in the realms of Science, Humanities and Literature. A pre-test post-test two group experimental design was selected. The sample consisted of 80 pre-service teachers. The pre-test and post-test scores were analyzed using SPSS 23. Homogeneity of both the groups was obtained through Levene\u2019s test. Group \u201cA\u201d was exposed to concepts explained by ChatGPT, while Group \u201cB\u201d received the same explanations via Gemini. Independent t-test for the post-test scores of both groups was run to check which was a better platform.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Findings<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Both ChatGPT and Gemini are good platforms for self-learning. On conducting an independent t-test for the post-test scores of both groups, it became evident that those who learned through ChatGPT exhibited superior performance. Hence, it can be concluded that ChatGPT is a better platform for self-learning as compared to Gemini.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Research limitations\/implications<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This study was conducted only on pre-service teachers and may not reflect the learning effectiveness of the AI chatbots on other groups of learners like school students or other working professionals. Although Levene\u2019s test was performed based on pre-test scores to ensure homogeneity in terms of knowledge between the groups, factors such as IQ and prior knowledge of the pre-service teachers were not accounted for. This study focuses on only three concepts from Science, Humanities and Literature. The results of this study might vary with different subjects or more complex concepts.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Practical implications<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>At higher education levels, most of the learning is self-directed. There are many platforms through which learning can take place. This study gives direction as to which platform is better and the probable reasons for it. There are more platforms that can also be studied as well as re-study can be done, as AI platforms are constantly being updated.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Social implications<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This study would help a majority of learns in the higher educational level and those who depend on AI form learning.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>No comparative experimental study has been done between ChatGPT and Gemini with regard to self-learning.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/itse-12-2023-0251","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,10]],"date-time":"2025-03-10T02:09:26Z","timestamp":1741572566000},"page":"688-698","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Exploring self-learning efficacy: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Gemini"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Daniella Maria","family":"Colaco","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Nirmala Institute of Education , Panaji,","place":["India"]}]},{"given":"Delia","family":"Antao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Nirmala Institute of Education , Panaji,","place":["India"]}]}],"member":"140","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,11]]},"reference":[{"article-title":"ChatGPT vs. Bard: a comparative study","year":"2023","author":"Ahmed","key":"2025101606483733700_ref001"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref002","first-page":"12043","article-title":"Artificial intelligence (AI): a review of its uses in language teaching and learning","volume":"769","author":"Ali","year":"2020","journal-title":"IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering"},{"issue":"5","key":"2025101606483733700_ref003","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1227\/neu.0000000000002551","article-title":"Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google bard on a neurosurgery oral boards preparation question bank","volume":"93","author":"Ali","year":"2023","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"2025101606483733700_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16100","DOI":"10.31004\/joe.v5i4.2745","article-title":"Can chat GPT replace the role of the teacher in the classroom: a fundamental analysis","volume":"5","author":"Ausat","year":"2023","journal-title":"Journal on Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref005","first-page":"1","article-title":"Google bard generated literature review: metaverse","volume":"7","author":"Ayd\u0131n","year":"2023","journal-title":"Journal of AI"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.30574\/wjaets.2023.8.1.0045","article-title":"Artificial intelligence AI-based chatbot study of ChatGPT, Google AI bard and Baidu AI","volume":"8","author":"Bal Ram","year":"2023","journal-title":"World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences"},{"key":"2025101606483733700_ref007","first-page":"95","article-title":"The promises and pitfalls of using chat GPT for self-determined learning in higher education: an argumentative review","volume":"2","author":"Baskara","year":"2023","journal-title":"Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIM Sinjai"},{"key":"2025101606483733700_ref008","first-page":"2615","volume-title":"Self-Directed Learning. In International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work: Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning","author":"Brookfield","year":"2009"},{"issue":"2","key":"2025101606483733700_ref009","article-title":"Enough of the chit-chat: a comparative analysis of four AI chatbots for calculus and statistics","volume":"6","author":"Calonge","year":"2023","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching"},{"issue":"3","key":"2025101606483733700_ref010","first-page":"290","article-title":"Self-regulation in online learning","volume":"34","author":"Cho","year":"2013","journal-title":"Distance Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4314\/jcsia.v27i1.4","article-title":"Impact of emerging technologies on the job performance of educators in selected tertiary institutions in Nigeria","volume":"27","author":"Edeh","year":"2020","journal-title":"Journal of Computer Science and Its Application"},{"issue":"3","key":"2025101606483733700_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.3102\/00028312003003187","article-title":"Testing homogeneity of variances","volume":"3","author":"Glass","year":"1966","journal-title":"American Educational Research Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12020","DOI":"10.1088\/1742-6596\/1387\/1\/012020","article-title":"Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot as language learning medium: an inquiry","volume":"1387","author":"Haristiani","year":"2019","journal-title":"Journal of Physics: Conference Series"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref014","first-page":"1","article-title":"Sample size and its role in Central Limit Theorem (CLT)","volume":"4","author":"Islam","year":"2018","journal-title":"Computational and Applied Mathematics Journal"},{"key":"2025101606483733700_ref015","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lindif.2023.102274","article-title":"ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education","volume":"103","author":"Kasneci","year":"2023","journal-title":"Learning and Individual Differences"},{"issue":"6","key":"2025101606483733700_ref016","first-page":"3757","article-title":"Strategies for enhancing self-regulation in e-learning: a review of selected journal publications from 2010 to 2020","volume":"31","author":"Lai","year":"2023","journal-title":"Interactive Learning Environments"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref017","first-page":"17260396","article-title":"Reimagining self-directed learning language in the age of artificial intelligence: a systematic review","volume":"57","author":"Lashari","year":"2023","journal-title":"Grassroots"},{"key":"2025101606483733700_ref018","article-title":"Reconceptualizing self-directed learning in the era of generative AI: an exploratory analysis of language learning","volume":"17","author":"Li","year":"2024","journal-title":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies"},{"issue":"3","key":"2025101606483733700_ref019","first-page":"10451595231184928","article-title":"Exploring the role of ChatGPT as a facilitator for motivating self-directed learning among adult learners","volume":"35","author":"Lin","year":"2023","journal-title":"Adult Learning"},{"issue":"4","key":"2025101606483733700_ref020","first-page":"1974","article-title":"The potential for digital technology to support self-directed learning in formal education of children: a scoping review","volume":"31","author":"Morris","year":"2023","journal-title":"Interactive Learning Environments"},{"key":"2025101606483733700_ref021","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/5624475","article-title":"Prospects and challenges of using machine learning for academic forecasting","volume":"2022","author":"Onyema","year":"2022","journal-title":"Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience"},{"article-title":"The AI race is on! Google\u2019s bard and openai\u2019s chatgpt head to head: an opinion article","year":"2023","author":"Rahaman","key":"2025101606483733700_ref022"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref023","first-page":"1","article-title":"Enhancing the quality of teaching and learning through gemini, ChatGPT, and similar generative artificial intelligence: challenges, future prospects, and ethical considerations in education","volume":"5","author":"Rane","year":"2024","journal-title":"TESOL and Technology Studies"},{"key":"2025101606483733700_ref024","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4723687","article-title":"Gemini versus ChatGPT: applications, performance, architecture, capabilities, and implementation","author":"Rane","year":"2024","journal-title":"SSRN Electronic Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref025","article-title":"War of the chatbots: bard, bing chat, ChatGPT, ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education","volume":"6","author":"Rudolph","year":"2023","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching"},{"article-title":"Human versus artificial intelligence: ChatGPT-4 outperforming bing, bard, ChatGPT-3.5, and humans in clinical chemistry multiple-choice questions","year":"2024","author":"Sallam","key":"2025101606483733700_ref026"},{"article-title":"Enhancing physics learning with ChatGPT, bing chat, and bard as agents-to-Think-With: a comparative case study","year":"2023","author":"Santos","key":"2025101606483733700_ref027"},{"issue":"10","key":"2025101606483733700_ref028","first-page":"1944","article-title":"On some test statistics for testing homogeneity of variances: a comparative study","volume":"83","author":"Sharma","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation"},{"key":"2025101606483733700_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10755-023-09686-1","article-title":"Students\u2019 acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: an extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology","author":"Strzelecki","year":"2023","journal-title":"Innovative Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref030","first-page":"1","article-title":"AI in education: a systematic literature review","volume":"23","author":"Tahiru","year":"2021","journal-title":"Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT)"},{"issue":"3","key":"2025101606483733700_ref031","first-page":"531","article-title":"The effect of art-based learning to improve teaching effectiveness in pre-service teachers","volume":"7","author":"Zakaria","year":"2019","journal-title":"Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025101606483733700_ref032","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/8812542","article-title":"A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020","volume":"2021","author":"Zhai","year":"2021","journal-title":"Complexity"},{"article-title":"Can chatgpt-like generative models guarantee factual accuracy? On the mistakes of new generation search engines","year":"2023","author":"Zhao","key":"2025101606483733700_ref033"}],"container-title":["Interactive Technology and Smart Education"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/ITSE-12-2023-0251\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/itse\/article-pdf\/22\/4\/688\/10360110\/itse-12-2023-0251en.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/itse\/article-pdf\/22\/4\/688\/10360110\/itse-12-2023-0251en.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,16]],"date-time":"2025-10-16T10:50:00Z","timestamp":1760611800000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/itse\/article\/22\/4\/688\/1251459\/Exploring-self-learning-efficacy-a-comparative"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,11]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/itse-12-2023-0251","relation":{},"ISSN":["1741-5659","1758-8510"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1741-5659"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1758-8510"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,11]]}}}