{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T17:37:34Z","timestamp":1754156254187,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]],"date-time":"2021-03-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1615507200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JD"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>This viewpoint article looks at several approaches to peer review that become detrimental to the scholarly process and disadvantage diverse voices in the scholarly conversation.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>As a viewpoint article, the piece relies on published research and the author's personal experience as an author and a journal editor.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>The article focuses on the manuscript structure; manuscript length expectations; and several immediately obvious effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the scholarly communication process.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>The article addresses the aforementioned aspects of peer review with a goal of contemplating their cumulative impact on the state of diversity in scholarly communication and suggests possible ways of rethinking the situation.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/jd-01-2021-0002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,10]],"date-time":"2021-03-10T06:51:47Z","timestamp":1615359107000},"page":"1096-1106","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["ViewpointRuminations on peer review in the time of social change"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"77","author":[{"given":"Keren","family":"Dali","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]]},"reference":[{"volume-title":"Unsettling Eurocentrism in the Western University","year":"2018","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref001"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1108\/JD-05-2016-0068","article-title":"The way of WalDorF: fostering creativity in LIS programs","volume":"73","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Documentation"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1086\/696578","article-title":"Beyond scholarly publishing: the human dimension of peer review in LIS","volume":"88","year":"2018","journal-title":"The Library Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.3138\/jsp.46.1.005","article-title":"How to be an effective peer reviewer: some personal thoughts","volume":"46","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing"},{"volume-title":"Writing Architectures: Ficto-Critical Approaches","year":"2020","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref005"},{"key":"key2022092217173954400_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hamilton, M. and Pitt, K. (2009), \u201cCreativity in academic writing: escaping from the straitjacket of genre?\u201d, in Lillis, T.M., Parkin, S., Ivanic, R. and Carter, A. (Eds), Why Writing Matters: Issues of Access and Identity in Writing Research and Pedagogy, John Benjamins North America, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 61-80.","DOI":"10.1075\/swll.12.12ham"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1017\/S0018246X17000334","article-title":"The Royal Society and the prehistory of peer review, 1665\u20131965","volume":"61","year":"2018","journal-title":"The Historical Journal"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1086\/603087","article-title":"Can a \u2018hard\u2019 science answer \u2018hard\u2019 questions? A response to Sandstrom and Sandstrom","volume":"69","year":"1999","journal-title":"The Library Quarterly"},{"volume-title":"Privilege Checklist","author":"Privilege Checklist","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref009"},{"volume-title":"Decolonizing Academia: Poverty, Oppression and Pain","year":"2018","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref010"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1086\/602775","article-title":"The use and misuse of anthropological methods in library and information science research","volume":"65","year":"1995","journal-title":"The Library Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1086\/602949","article-title":"Qualitative research in LIS Redux: a response to a [re]turn to positivistic ethnography","volume":"68","year":"1998","journal-title":"The Library Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022092217173954400_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1007\/s10672-014-9246-1","article-title":"Telling tales to share multiple truths: disability and workplace bullying: a semifiction case study","volume":"27","year":"2015","journal-title":"Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal"},{"key":"key2022092217173954400_ref014","unstructured":"Young, I.M. (2018), \u201cFive faces of oppression\u201d, in Adams, M. (Ed.), Readings for Diversity and Social Justice, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 49-59."}],"container-title":["Journal of Documentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JD-01-2021-0002\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JD-01-2021-0002\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T22:33:07Z","timestamp":1753396387000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jd\/article\/77\/5\/1096-1106\/194305"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/JD-01-2021-0002"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/jd-01-2021-0002","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-0418"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0022-0418"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]]}}}