{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,25]],"date-time":"2026-02-25T06:40:57Z","timestamp":1772001657084,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,13]],"date-time":"2017-03-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1489363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JD"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,13]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to measure reliability and validity of the Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy (Van Helvoort, 2010).<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Percentages of agreement and Intraclass Correlation were used to describe interrater reliability. For the determination of construct validity factor analysis and reliability analysis were used. Criterion validity was calculated with Pearson correlations.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>In the described case, the Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of information literate performance.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Reliability and validity are prerequisites to recommend a rubric for application. The results confirm that this Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy can be used in courses in higher education, not only for assessment purposes but also to foster learning.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/jd-05-2016-0066","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,22]],"date-time":"2017-02-22T11:36:36Z","timestamp":1487763396000},"page":"305-316","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Reliability and validity test of a Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"73","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5222-9726","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jos","family":"van Helvoort","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Saskia","family":"Brand-Gruwel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Frank","family":"Huysmans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ellen","family":"Sjoer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1080\/01639269.2015.996481","article-title":"The application of reliability and validity measures to assess the effectiveness of an undergraduate citation rubric","volume":"34","year":"2015","journal-title":"Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian"},{"key":"key2020120901563923600_ref002","volume-title":"NAEP 1996 Trends in Writing: Fluency and Writing Conventions","year":"1999"},{"key":"key2020120901563923600_ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Belanger, J., Zou, N., Mills, J., Holmes, C. and Oakleaf, M. (2015), \u201cProject RAILS: lessons learned about rubric assessment of information literacy skills\u201d, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 623-644.","DOI":"10.1353\/pla.2015.0050"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2004.10.005","article-title":"Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill","volume":"21","year":"2005","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"issue":"12","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref005","first-page":"1","article-title":"Examining design and inter-rater reliability of a rubric measuring research quality across multiple disciplines","volume":"14","year":"2009","journal-title":"Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.5860\/crl.68.3.229","article-title":"The development and validation of the information literacy test","volume":"68","year":"2007","journal-title":"College & Research Libraries"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.11645\/9.1.1980","article-title":"Evidence-based instruction: assessing student work using rubrics and citation analysis to inform instructional design","volume":"9","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Information Literacy"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1037\/1040-3590.6.4.284","article-title":"Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology","volume":"6","year":"1994","journal-title":"Psychological Assessment"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1037\/h0040957","article-title":"Construct validity in psychological tests","volume":"52","year":"1955","journal-title":"Psychological Bulletin"},{"key":"key2020120901563923600_ref010","volume-title":"Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences","year":"1996"},{"key":"key2020120901563923600_ref011","first-page":"82","article-title":"Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach\u2019s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales","year":"2003"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.20982\/tqmp.08.1.p023","article-title":"Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial","volume":"8","year":"2012","journal-title":"Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acalib.2013.09.001","article-title":"The official (and unofficial) rules for norming rubrics successfully","volume":"39","year":"2013","journal-title":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.edurev.2007.05.002","article-title":"The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences","volume":"2","year":"2007","journal-title":"Educational Research Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1108\/00907320610640752","article-title":"Using rubrics to assess information literacy","volume":"34","year":"2006","journal-title":"Reference Services Review"},{"issue":"16","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref016","article-title":"Computing intraclass correlations (ICC) as estimates of interrater reliability in SPSS","volume":"2011","year":"2011","journal-title":"NeoAcademic"},{"issue":"10","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref017","first-page":"71","article-title":"Scoring rubric development: validity and reliability","volume":"7","year":"2000","journal-title":"Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation"},{"key":"key2020120901563923600_ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oakleaf, M. (2008), \u201cDangers and opportunities: a conceptual map of information literacy assessment approaches\u201d, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 233-253.","DOI":"10.1353\/pla.0.0011"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"969","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21030","article-title":"Using rubrics to assess information literacy: an examination of methodology and interrater reliability","volume":"60","year":"2009","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1177\/0961000614532675","article-title":"Uncovering information literacy\u2019s disciplinary differences through students\u2019 attitudes: an empirical study","volume":"47","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1080\/02602930902862859","article-title":"A review of rubric use in higher education","volume":"35","year":"2010","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref022","first-page":"1","article-title":"A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability","volume":"9","year":"2004","journal-title":"Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref023","first-page":"22","article-title":"A scoring rubric for performance assessment of information literacy in Dutch higher education","volume":"4","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of Information Literacy"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acalib.2012.03.016","article-title":"How adult students in information studies use a scoring rubric for the development of their information literacy skills","volume":"38","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Academic Librarianship"},{"issue":"397","key":"key2020120901563923600_ref025","first-page":"436","article-title":"How faculty in the Hague university of applied sciences uses the Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy","year":"2013","journal-title":"Communications in Computer and Information Science"},{"key":"key2020120901563923600_ref026","unstructured":"Van Helvoort, J. (2016), \u201cBeoordelen van informatievaardigheden in het hoger onderwijs\u201d, dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Delft."},{"key":"key2020120901563923600_ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Helvoort, J. and Joosten, H. (2017), \u201cThe Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy as a tool for learning\u201d, in Sales, D. and Pinto, M. (Eds), Pathways into Information Literacy and Communities of Practice: Teaching Approaches and Case Studies, Chandos, Oxford, pp. 115-131.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-08-100673-3.00005-8"}],"container-title":["Journal of Documentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JD-05-2016-0066\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JD-05-2016-0066\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T22:33:59Z","timestamp":1753396439000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jd\/article\/73\/2\/305-316\/206187"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,13]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,13]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/JD-05-2016-0066"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/jd-05-2016-0066","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-0418"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-0418","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,13]]}}}