{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T19:54:48Z","timestamp":1781639688199,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,14]],"date-time":"2019-01-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1547424000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JD"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,14]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into publication practices from the perspective of academics working within four disciplinary communities: biosciences, astronomy\/physics, education and history. The paper explores the ways in which these multiple overlapping communities intersect with the journal landscape and the implications for the adoption and use of new players in the scholarly communication system, particularly open-access mega-journals (OAMJs). OAMJs (e.g. <jats:italic>PLOS ONE<\/jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Scientific Reports<\/jats:italic>) are large, broad scope, open-access journals that base editorial decisions solely on the technical\/scientific soundness of the article.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Focus groups with active researchers in these fields were held in five UK Higher Education Institutions across Great Britain, and were complemented by interviews with pro-vice-chancellors for research at each institution.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>A strong finding to emerge from the data is the notion of researchers belonging to multiple overlapping communities, with some inherent tensions in meeting the requirements for these different audiences. Researcher perceptions of evaluation mechanisms were found to play a major role in attitudes towards OAMJs, and interviews with the pro-vice-chancellors for research indicate that there is a difference between researchers\u2019 perceptions and the values embedded in institutional frameworks.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This is the first purely qualitative study relating to researcher perspectives on OAMJs. The findings of the paper will be of interest to publishers, policy-makers, research managers and academics.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/jd-05-2018-0067","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,24]],"date-time":"2018-10-24T11:15:42Z","timestamp":1540379742000},"page":"120-139","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Academic communities"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"75","author":[{"given":"Simon","family":"Wakeling","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Valerie","family":"Spezi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3110-1683","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jenny","family":"Fry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Claire","family":"Creaser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stephen","family":"Pinfield","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Willett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref001","volume-title":"Chaos of Disciplines","year":"2001"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref002","unstructured":"Adie, E. (2009), \u201cCommenting on scientific articles (PLoS edition)\u201d, Nascent, available at: http:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/nascent\/2009\/02\/commenting_on_scientific_artic.html (accessed 21 September 2017)."},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref003","unstructured":"Anderson, K. (2010), \u201cPLoS\u2019 squandered opportunity \u2013 their problems with the path of least resistance [Web log post]\u201d, Scholarly Kitchen Blog, available at: http:\/\/scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org\/2010\/04\/27\/plos-squandered-opportunity-the-problem-with-pursuing-the-path-of-least-resistance\/ (accessed 27 January 2016)."},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref004","unstructured":"Anderson, K. (2016), \u201cThe new(ish) kids on the block \u2013 touring the megajournals [Web log post]\u201d, The Scholarly Kitchen, available at: https:\/\/scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org\/2016\/04\/05\/the-newish-kids-on-the-block-touring-the-megajournals\/ (accessed 7 June 2016)."},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref005","volume-title":"Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines","year":"2001"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref006","volume-title":"Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition, Culture, Power","year":"1995"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e981","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj.981","article-title":"Have the \u2018mega-journals\u2019 reached the limits to growth?","volume":"3","year":"2015","journal-title":"Peer J"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","article-title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","volume":"3","year":"2006","journal-title":"Qualitative Research in Psychology"},{"issue":"7442","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1038\/495433a","article-title":"Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing","volume":"495","year":"2013","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref010","volume-title":"The Symbolic Construction of Community","year":"1985"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref011","unstructured":"Cope, B. and Phillips, A. (Eds) (2014), The Future of the Academic Journal, 2nd ed., Chandos Publishing, Oxford."},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref012","volume-title":"Invisible Colleges; Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities","year":"1972"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref014","unstructured":"Fry, J., Probets, S., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Spezi, V. and White, S. (2009), \u201cPEER behavioural research baseline: authors and users vis-\u00e0-vis journals and repositories\u201d, available at: www.peerproject.eu\/fileadmin\/media\/reports\/Final_revision_-_behavioural_baseline_report_-_20_01_10.pdf (accessed 17 November 2017)."},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref013","unstructured":"Fry, J., Oppenheim, C., Creaser, C., Johnson, W., Summers, M., White, S., Butters, G., Craven, J., Griffiths, J. and Hartley, D. (2009), \u201cCommunicating knowledge: how and why UK researchers publish and disseminate their findings\u201d, Research Information Network (RIN), London, available at: www.rin.ac.uk\/system\/files\/attachments\/Communicating-knowledge-report.pdf (accessed 17 November 2017)."},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref015","volume-title":"Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities","year":"1979"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref016","year":"2010"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref017","first-page":"592","article-title":"The electronic journal as the heart of an online scholarly community","volume":"43","year":"1995","journal-title":"Library Trends"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jaccedu.2004.09.002","article-title":"Faculty perceptions of journals: quality and publishing feasibility","volume":"22","year":"2004","journal-title":"Journal of Accounting Education"},{"issue":"7548","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1038\/520429a","article-title":"Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics","volume":"520","year":"2015","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<400::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Y","article-title":"Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis","volume":"46","year":"1995","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref020","unstructured":"Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R.C. and Wulfson, K. (2013), \u201cUK survey of academics 2012\u201d, available at: www.rluk.ac.uk\/ (accessed 18 July 2017)."},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.5860\/crl_46_01_40","article-title":"Ratings of journals by ARL library directors and deans of library and information science schools","volume":"46","year":"1985","journal-title":"College and Research Libraries"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6629(199610)24:4<315::AID-JCOP2>3.0.CO;2-T","article-title":"Sense of community","volume":"24","year":"1996","journal-title":"Journal of Community Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1002\/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I","article-title":"Sense of community: a definition and theory","volume":"14","year":"1986","journal-title":"Journal of Community Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref024","first-page":"17","article-title":"Journal rankings by health management faculty members: are there differences by rank, leadership status, or area of expertise?","volume":"60","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Healthcare Management\/American College of Healthcare Executives"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvx023","article-title":"Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences","volume":"26","year":"2017","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"issue":"11","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000242","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.1000242","article-title":"Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact","volume":"7","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Biology"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1177\/0165551510371883","article-title":"Researchers\u2019 e-journal use and information seeking behaviour","volume":"36","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of Information Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1087\/20140206","article-title":"Trust and authority in scholarly communications in the light of the digital transition: setting the scene for a major study","volume":"27","year":"2014","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1098","article-title":"Early career researchers: scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change","volume":"30","year":"2017","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref030","unstructured":"Patterson, M. (2009), \u201cPLoS journals \u2013 measuring impact where it matters\u201d, The Official PLOS Blog, available at: http:\/\/blogs.plos.org\/plos\/2009\/07\/plos-journals-measuring-impact-where-it-matters\/ (accessed 20 April 2017)."},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref031","author":"Research Information Network (RIN)","year":"2007"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvv038","article-title":"Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use\u2013a literature review","volume":"25","year":"2016","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref033","volume-title":"The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers","year":"2013"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref034","unstructured":"Sands, R. (2014), \u201cComparing the results from two surveys of BMJ Open authors [Web log post]\u201d, BMJ Blogs, available at: http:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmjopen\/2014\/05\/09\/comparing-the-results-from-two-surveys-of-bmj-open-authors\/ (accessed 12 December 2015)."},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref301","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sivertsen, G. (2017), \u201cUnique, but still best practice? The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspective\u201d, Palgrave Communications, Vol. 3, p. e17078, available at: www.nature.com\/articles\/palcomms201778.pdf (accessed 12 January 2018).","DOI":"10.1057\/palcomms.2017.78"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e365","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj.365","article-title":"A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals","volume":"2","year":"2014","journal-title":"Peer J"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1108\/JD-06-2016-0082","article-title":"Open-access mega-journals: the future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review","volume":"73","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Documentation"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref037","volume-title":"Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings","year":"1990"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref302","year":"1998","journal-title":"Other Foors, Other Voices: A Textography of a Small University Building"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-08-2016-0136","article-title":"Comparison of US and UK rankings of LIS journals","volume":"69","year":"2017","journal-title":"Aslib Journal of Information Management"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.3390\/publications4030022","article-title":"What motivates authors of scholarly articles? The importance of journal attributes and potential audience on publication choice","volume":"4","year":"2016","journal-title":"Publications"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref040","volume-title":"Community and Society","year":"1957"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref303","first-page":"17","article-title":"Academic tribes and territories: the theoretical trajectory","volume":"25","year":"2014","journal-title":"\u00d6sterreichische Zeitschrift F\u00fcr Geschichtswissenschaften"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1108\/AAAJ-01-2012-00932","article-title":"Practitioners are from mars: academics are from Venus?","volume":"27","year":"2014","journal-title":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal"},{"issue":"11","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0165359","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0165359","article-title":"Open-access mega-journals: a bibliometric profile","volume":"11","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref043","first-page":"313","year":"2017"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092517055059400_ref044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1117","article-title":"Open Access megajournals: the publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations)","volume":"30","year":"2017","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref045","volume-title":"The STM Report","year":"2015"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref046","volume-title":"The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences","year":"2000"},{"key":"key2020092517055059400_ref047","volume-title":"Metric Tide \u2013 Higher Education Funding Council for England","year":"2015"}],"container-title":["Journal of Documentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JD-05-2018-0067\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JD-05-2018-0067\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T22:34:00Z","timestamp":1753396440000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jd\/article\/75\/1\/120-139\/199576"}},"subtitle":["The role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,14]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,14]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/JD-05-2018-0067"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/jd-05-2018-0067","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-0418"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-0418","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,14]]}}}