{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]],"date-time":"2026-03-07T03:06:17Z","timestamp":1772852777099,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,7]],"date-time":"2014-01-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1389052800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u2013 The major aim of this study is to specify the ways in which rhetorical strategies are employed in Q&amp;A (question and answer) discussion, and how information sources are used to support such strategies.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u2013 The study is based on the analysis of 944 answers provided to the questions about global warming in Yahoo! Answers. The answers were analysed by means of descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u2013 Twelve rhetorical strategies serving the ends of classic rhetorical appeals, i.e. ethos, pathos and logos, were identified. The answerers drew most frequently on strategies related to logos (for example, appeal to reason) and ethos (for example, appeal to authority), while the strategies serving the ends of pathos (for example, argument ad hominem) were less popular. To support the rhetorical strategies, the answerers mainly used scientific sources such as websites of research organizations and persuasive material like Youtube videos.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Research limitations\/implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u2013 The findings are based on the analysis of a Q&amp;A site focusing on a controversial issue providing fertile ground for the use of rhetorical arguments.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u2013 The findings can be used in information literacy instruction. It would be easier for the users to evaluate the relevance and credibility of information if they become aware of the specific ways in which askers and answerers on Q&amp;A sites make use of persuasive communication.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u2013 The study is unique in that it elaborates the ways in which rhetorical strategies are employed as ways of persuasive communication in Q&amp;A discussion.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/jd-11-2012-0152","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,12]],"date-time":"2013-12-12T10:35:36Z","timestamp":1386844536000},"page":"93-118","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["The use of rhetorical strategies in Q&amp;A discussion"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"70","author":[{"given":"Reijo","family":"Savolainen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Adamic, L. , Zhang, J. , Bakshy, E. and Ackerman, M. (2008), \u201cKnowledge sharing and Yahoo! Answers: everyone knows something\u201d, Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on the World Wide Web (ACMWWW'08), ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 665-674.","DOI":"10.1145\/1367497.1367587"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b2","unstructured":"Anand, P. , King, J. , Boyd-Graber, J. , Wagner, E. , Martell, C. , Oard, D. and Resnik, P. (2011), \u201cBelieve me \u2013 we can do this! Annotating persuasive acts in blog text\u201d, pp. 11-15, in The AAAI 2011 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (WS-11-19), San Francisco, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), available at: www.umiacs.umd.edu\/\u223cjbg\/docs\/persuasion.pdf (accessed 31 October 2012)."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b50","unstructured":"Bizzel, P. and Herzberg, B. (1990), The Rhetorical Tradition. Readings from Classical Times to the Present, Bedford Books of St. Martin's Press, Boston, MA."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b3","unstructured":"Borchers, T.A. (2006), Rhetorical Theory. An Introduction, Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b4","unstructured":"Bradley, R.S. (2011), Global Warming and Political Intimidation: How Politicians Cracked Down on Scientists as the Earth Heated Up, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, MA."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burke, M. , Joyce, E. , Kim, T. , Anand, V. and Kraut, R. (2007), \u201cIntroductions and requests: rhetorical strategies that elicit response in online communities\u201d, in Steinfield, C. , Pentland, B.T. , Ackerman, M. and Contractor, N. (Eds), Communication and Technologies. Proceedings of the 3rd Communities and Technologies Conference, Michigan State University, 2007, Springer, Berlin, pp. 21-39.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-84628-905-7_2"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b6","unstructured":"Clark, J. and Clark, T. (2005), Humbug! The Skeptic's Field Guide to Spotting Fallacies in Thinking, Nifty Books, Capalaba."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edbauer, J. (2005), \u201cUnframing models of public distribution: from rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies\u201d, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 5-24.","DOI":"10.1080\/02773940509391320"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Feinberg, M. (2010), \u201cTwo kinds of evidence: how information systems form rhetorical arguments\u201d, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 66 No. 4, pp. 491-512.","DOI":"10.1108\/00220411011052920"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b9","unstructured":"Fogelin, R.J. (1974), Understanding Arguments, Harcourt Brace Javanovich, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gazan, R. (2011), \u201cSocial Q&A\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 61 No. 12, pp. 2301-2312.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21562"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gilbert, G.N. (1977), \u201cReferencing as persuasion\u201d, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 113-122.","DOI":"10.1177\/030631277700700112"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b12","unstructured":"Harper, F.M. , Weinberg, J. , Logie, J. and Konstan, J.A. (2010), \u201cQuestion types in social Q&A sites\u201d, First Monday, Vol. 15 No. 7, available at: http:\/\/firstmonday.org\/htbin\/cgiwrap\/bin\/ojs\/index.php\/fm\/rt\/printerFriendly\/2913\/2571#p2 (accessed 21 January 2013)."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b13","unstructured":"Hoggan, J. and Littlemore, R. (2009), Climate Cover-up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming, Greystone Books, Vancouver."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnson, L. (2009), \u201c(Environmental) rhetorics of tempered apocalypticism in An Inconvenient Truth \u201d, Rhetoric Review, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 29-46.","DOI":"10.1080\/07350190802540708"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lanham, R.A. (1991), A Handbook of Rhetorical Terms, 2nd ed., University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520912045"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.","DOI":"10.1016\/0147-1767(85)90062-8"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b17","unstructured":"Miller, G.R. (1980), \u201cOn being persuaded: some basic distinctions\u201d, in Roloff, M.E. and Miller, G.R. (Eds), Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 11-27."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b18","unstructured":"Myerson, G. and Rydin, Y. (1996), The Language of Environment: A New Rhetoric, UCL Press, London."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oh, S. (2012), \u201cThe characteristics and motivations of health answerers for sharing information, knowledge, and experience in online environments\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 63 No. 3, pp. 543-577.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21676"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b20","unstructured":"Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969), The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation, University of Notre Dame Press, London."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rife, M.C. (2010), \u201cEthos, pathos, logos, kairos: using a rhetorical heuristic to mediate digital-survey recruitment strategies\u201d, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 260-277.","DOI":"10.1109\/TPC.2010.2052856"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Savolainen, R. (2011), \u201cRequesting and providing information in blogs and internet discussion forums\u201d, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 67 No. 5, pp. 863-886.","DOI":"10.1108\/00220411111164718"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Savolainen, R. (2012), \u201cThe structure of argument patterns on a social Q&A site\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 63 No. 12, pp. 2536-2548.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22722"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Savolainen, R. (2013), \u201cStrategies for justifying counter-arguments in Q&A discussion\u201d, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 544-556.","DOI":"10.1177\/0165551513478892"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shah, C. and Kitzie, V. (2012), \u201cSocial Q&A and virtual reference \u2013 comparing apples and oranges with the help of experts and users\u201d, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 63 No. 10, pp. 2020-2036.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22699"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shah, C. , Oh, S. and Oh, J.S. (2009), \u201cResearch agenda for social Q&A\u201d, Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 205-209.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lisr.2009.07.006"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b27","unstructured":"Singer, F.S. (1997), Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate, Independent Institute, Oakland, CA."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b28","unstructured":"Stiff, J.B. and Mongeau, P.A. (2003), Persuasive Communication, 2nd ed., Guilford Press, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b29","unstructured":"Surowiecki, J. (2004), The Wisdom of Crowds \u2013 Why Many Are Smarter Than the Few And How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies And Nations, Doubleday, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tindale, C.W. (2004), Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781452204482"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Toulmin, S.E. (2003), The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511840005"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b32","unstructured":"Walton, D. (1997), Appeal to Expert Opinions: Arguments from Authority, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b33","unstructured":"Walton, D. (2008), Informal Logic. A Pragmatic Approach, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b34","unstructured":"Warnick, B. (2007), Rhetoric Online: Persuasion and Politics on the World Wide Web, Peter Lang, New York, NY."},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wikgren, M. (2001), \u201cHealth discussions on the internet: a study of knowledge communication through citations\u201d, Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 305-317.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0740-8188(01)00091-3"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wikgren, M. (2003), \u201cEveryday health information exchange and citation behaviour in internet discussion groups\u201d, The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, Vol. 4, pp. 225-239.","DOI":"10.1080\/14716310310001631543"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wynne, P. (1991), \u201cKnowledge in context\u201d, Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 111-121.","DOI":"10.1177\/016224399101600108"},{"key":"key2021010400573308400_b38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zarefsky, D. (2008), \u201cKnowledge claims in rhetorical criticism\u201d, Journal of Communication, Vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 629-640.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-2466.2008.00405.x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Documentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/JD-11-2012-0152","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JD-11-2012-0152\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JD-11-2012-0152\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T22:35:21Z","timestamp":1753396521000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jd\/article\/70\/1\/93-118\/204796"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,7]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/JD-11-2012-0152"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/jd-11-2012-0152","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-0418"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-0418","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,7]]}}}