{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T17:37:14Z","timestamp":1754156234085,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":8,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,14]],"date-time":"2015-09-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1442188800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,14]]},"abstract":"\n Purpose<\/jats:title>\n \u2013 Despite the ever-growing number of PhD students all over the world, there remain significant doubts about whether entering students in business and management disciplines fully understand the process of producing a PhD thesis, defending it and developing a coherent publication strategy. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to offer some guidance on what it takes to successfully complete a doctoral research thesis. <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n \u2013 The arguments and guidance presented in this viewpoint paper are drawn on the authors\u2019 collective supervision and doctoral examination experiences. <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Findings<\/jats:title>\n \u2013 The paper presents guidelines on three key issues related with the doctoral completion: choosing a research problem; demonstrating rigour and quality; developing a publication strategy. <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n \u2013 The content presented in this paper would be valuable aide to those pursuing doctoral research.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/jeim-12-2014-0118","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,18]],"date-time":"2015-09-18T10:23:36Z","timestamp":1442571816000},"page":"615-621","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Completing a PhD in business and management"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Yogesh K","family":"Dwivedi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M. N.","family":"Ravishankar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Antonis Constantinou","family":"Simintiras","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2020122102595085700_b1","unstructured":"Davis, G.B.\n (2000), \u201cWriting a doctoral dissertation: a systematic approach\u201d, \n Decision Line\n , Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 19-20."},{"key":"key2020122102595085700_b2","unstructured":"Davis, G.B.\n and \n Parker, C.A.\n (1997), \n Writing the Doctoral Dissertation\n , Barron\u2019s Educational Series Inc., New York, NY."},{"key":"key2020122102595085700_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dwivedi, Y.K.\n , \n Wade, M.R.\n and \n Schneberger, S.L.\n (2012), \n Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society\n , Springer, New York, NY.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4419-9707-4"},{"key":"key2020122102595085700_b4","unstructured":"Grover, V.\n (2004), \u201cA rough model for success in doctoral study\u201d, \n Decision Line\n , Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 23-25."},{"key":"key2020122102595085700_b5","unstructured":"Robey, D.\n (2001), \u201cAnswers to doctoral students\u2019 frequently asked questions (FAQs)\u201d, \n Decision Line\n , Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 10-12."},{"key":"key2020122102595085700_b6","unstructured":"UGC Regulation\n (2009), \u201cMinimum standards and procedure for the award of MPhil\/PhD\u201d, available at: www.ugc.ac.in\/oldpdf\/regulations\/mphilphdclarification.pdf (accessed 9 December 2013)."},{"key":"key2020122102595085700_b7","unstructured":"Webster, J.\n and \n Watson, R.T.\n (2002), \u201cAnalyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review\u201d, \n MIS Quarterly\n , Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. xiii-xxiii."},{"key":"key2020122102595085700_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Whetten, D.A.\n (1989), \u201cWhat constitutes a theoretical contribution?\u201d, \n Academy of Management Review\n , Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 490-495.","DOI":"10.5465\/amr.1989.4308371"}],"container-title":["Journal of Enterprise Information Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/JEIM-12-2014-0118","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JEIM-12-2014-0118\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JEIM-12-2014-0118\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T22:32:24Z","timestamp":1753396344000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jeim\/article\/28\/5\/615-621\/198594"}},"subtitle":["A brief guide to doctoral students and universities"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,14]]},"references-count":8,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,14]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/JEIM-12-2014-0118"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/jeim-12-2014-0118","relation":{},"ISSN":["1741-0398"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1741-0398"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,14]]}}}