{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]],"date-time":"2026-02-04T16:01:37Z","timestamp":1770220897348,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":54,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,12]],"date-time":"2019-08-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1565568000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JICES"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Whistle-blowing, which has become an integral part of the post-publication peer-review movement, is being fortified by social media. Anonymous commenting on blogs as well as Tweets about suspicions of academic misconduct can spread quickly on social media sites like Twitter. The purpose of this paper is to examine two cases to expand the discussion about how complex post-publication peer review is and to contextualize the use of social media within this movement.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This paper examines a Twitter-based exchange between an established pseudonymous blogger and science critic, <jats:italic>Neuroskeptic<\/jats:italic>, and Elizabeth Wager, the former COPE Chair, within a wider discussion of the use of social media in post-publication peer review. The paper also discusses false claims made on Twitter by another science watchdog, Leonid Schneider. The policies of 15 publishers related to anonymous or pseudonymous whistle-blowing are examined.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Four issues in the <jats:italic>Neuroskeptic<\/jats:italic>\u2013Wager case were debated: the solicitation by Wager to publish in RIPR; the use of commercial software by <jats:italic>Neuroskeptic<\/jats:italic> to make anonymous reports to journals; the links between \u201cpublication ethics\u201d leaders and whistle-blowers or pseudonymous identities; the issues of transparency and possible hidden conflicts of interest. Only one publisher (Wiley) out of 15 scientific publishers examined claimed in its official ethical guidelines that anonymous reports should be investigated in the same way as named reports, while three publishers (Inderscience, PLOS and Springer Nature) referred to the COPE guidelines.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>No such Twitter-based case has yet been examined in detail in the publishing ethics literature.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/jices-05-2018-0051","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,19]],"date-time":"2019-06-19T09:02:06Z","timestamp":1560934926000},"page":"354-370","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["A new dimension in publishing ethics: social media-based ethics-related accusations"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Jaime A.","family":"Teixeira da Silva","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Judit","family":"Dobr\u00e1nszki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1274","DOI":"10.1108\/JD-04-2018-0051","article-title":"Why not use it more?\u201d Sources of self-efficacy in researchers\u2019 use of social media for knowledge sharing","volume":"74","year":"2018","journal-title":"Journal of Documentation"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref02a","unstructured":"Bentham (2019), available at: https:\/\/benthamscience.com\/publishing-ethics-main.php"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2698-6","article-title":"Allegation of scientific misconduct increases twitter attention","volume":"115","year":"2018","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"10","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref003","first-page":"712","article-title":"Blogs and twitter in medical publications \u2013 too unreliable to quote, or a change waiting to happen?","volume":"101","year":"2011","journal-title":"The South African Medical Journal"},{"issue":"10","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0162680","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0162680","article-title":"How are scientists using social media in the workplace?","volume":"11","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0014402918793138","article-title":"Promoting open science to increase the trustworthiness of evidence in special education","volume":"85","year":"2017","journal-title":"Exceptional Children"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref07a","unstructured":"De Gruyter (2019), available at: www.degruyter.com\/staticfiles\/pdfs\/140117_Publication_ethics_and_publication_malpractice_FINAL.pdf"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref08a","unstructured":"Elsevier (2019), available at: www.elsevier.com\/about\/policies\/publishing-ethics"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref09a","unstructured":"Emerald (2019), available at: www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com\/editors\/publishing-ethics.htm"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e123","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.2012","article-title":"Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact","volume":"13","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Internet Research"},{"issue":"9","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1038\/s41393-018-0193-9","article-title":"Publication pressure and scientific misconduct: why we need more open governance","volume":"56","year":"2018","journal-title":"Spinal Cord"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2017.02185","article-title":"Men who compliment a woman\u2019s appearance using metaphorical language: associations with creativity, masculinity, intelligence and attractiveness","volume":"8","year":"2017","journal-title":"Frontiers in Psychology"},{"issue":"40871","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref009","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/srep40871","article-title":"Women prefer men who use metaphorical language when paying compliments in a romantic context","volume":"7","year":"2017","journal-title":"Scientific Reports"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-122414-033437","article-title":"Scientific misconduct","volume":"67","year":"2016","journal-title":"Annual Review of Psychology"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref015a","unstructured":"Hindawi (2019), available at: www.hindawi.com\/ethics\/#investigations"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref016a","unstructured":"IEEE (2019), available at: https:\/\/secure.ethicspoint.com\/domain\/en\/report_custom.asp?clientid=20410"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref017a","unstructured":"Inderscience (2019), available at: www.inderscience.com\/mobile\/ingeneral\/index.php?pid=11"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tig.2015.03.006","article-title":"Reviewing post-publication peer review","volume":"31","year":"2015","journal-title":"Trends in Genetics"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1111\/bcpt.12568","article-title":"Strategies for using plagiarism software in the screening of incoming journal manuscripts: recommendations based on a recent literature survey","volume":"119","year":"2016","journal-title":"Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref020a","unstructured":"MDPI (2019), available at: www.mdpi.com\/about"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.2307\/3648979","article-title":"Editorial favoritism in economics?","volume":"70","year":"2003","journal-title":"Southern Economic Journal"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref022a","unstructured":"Nature Publishing Group (NPG) (2019), available at: www.nature.com\/authors\/policies\/corrections.html"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref014","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1098","article-title":"Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change","volume":"30","year":"2017","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref024a","unstructured":"Oxford University Press (OUP) (2019), available at: https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/authors\/ethics"},{"issue":"6381","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref015","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1225","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aas9490","article-title":"Postpublication peer review: a crucial tool","volume":"359","year":"2018","journal-title":"Science (New York, N.Y.)"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref026a","unstructured":"PLoS (2019), available at: https:\/\/journals.plos.org\/plosone\/s\/ethical-publishing-practice; www.plos.org\/editorial-publishing-policies; https:\/\/journals.plos.org\/plosone\/s\/comments"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref027a","unstructured":"SAGE (2019), available at: https:\/\/uk.sagepub.com\/en-gb\/eur\/editor-resources-ethics-approval-and-informed-consent-statements"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.22452\/mjlis.vol22no3.6","article-title":"Uncovering the scholarly use of twitter in the academia: experiences in a British University","volume":"22","year":"2017","journal-title":"Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science"},{"issue":"11","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref017","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2012-100524","article-title":"Accessibility and transparency of editor conflicts of interest policy instruments in medical journals","volume":"38","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref030a","unstructured":"Springer-Nature (2019), available at: www.springer.com\/gp\/authors-editors\/journal-author\/journal-author-helpdesk\/publishing-ethics\/14214"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref018","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e57","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.6706","article-title":"Scientific misconduct and social media: role of twitter in the stimulus triggered acquisition of pluripotency cells scandal","volume":"19","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Internet Research"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref032a","unstructured":"Taylor and Francis \/ Informa (Routledge) (2019), available at: https:\/\/editorresources.taylorandfrancisgroup.com\/publishing-ethics-2\/"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref019","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1007\/s10805-010-9107-y","article-title":"Who rules the rulers? On the misconduct of journal editors","volume":"8","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of Academic Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref020","first-page":"34","article-title":"Debunking post-publication peer review","volume":"1","year":"2015","journal-title":"International Journal of Education and Information Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref021","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.5901\/jesr.2015.v5n3p13","article-title":"Fair use in post-publication peer review","volume":"5","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Educational and Social Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref022","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.5901\/ajis.2016.v5n3p13","article-title":"Science watchdogs","volume":"5","year":"2016","journal-title":"Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref023","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1807","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-016-9825-7","article-title":"Are pseudonyms ethical in (science) publishing? Neuroskeptic as a case study","volume":"23","year":"2017","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref024","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.3329\/bjms.v16i4.33623","article-title":"Ethical exceptionalism: can publishing rules be manipulated to give the impression of ethical publishing?","volume":"16","year":"2017","journal-title":"Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2017c), \u201cThe ethical and academic implications of the jeffrey beall (www.scholarlyoa.com) blog shutdown\u201d, Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 1, doi: 10.1007\/S11948-017-9905-3","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-9905-3"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref026","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.21037\/amj.2017.06.14","article-title":"Caution with the continued use of Jeffrey Beall\u2019s \u2018predatory\u2019 open access publishing lists","volume":"2","year":"2017","journal-title":"AME Medical Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref027","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.17646\/KOME.2017.19","article-title":"Why does retraction watch continue to offer support to Jeffrey Beall, and legitimize his post-mortem \u2018predatory\u2019 lists?","volume":"5","year":"2017","journal-title":"KOME"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref028","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.21037\/amj.2017.02.10","article-title":"Fake peer reviews, fake identities, fake accounts, fake data: beware!","volume":"2","year":"2017","journal-title":"AME Medical Journal"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1899","DOI":"10.1104\/pp.15.01939","article-title":"Does the anonymous voice have a place in scholarly publishing?","volume":"170","year":"2016","journal-title":"Plant Physiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref030","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-2178-9","article-title":"Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited?","volume":"110","year":"2017","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref031","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1457","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-015-9716-3","article-title":"Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: ethical challenges, ghost and guest\/gift authorship, and the cultural\/disciplinary perspective","volume":"22","year":"2016","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref032","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1701\/2902.29244","article-title":"Editors moving forward: stick to academic basics, maximize transparency and respect, and enforce the rules","volume":"109","year":"2018","journal-title":"Recenti Progressi in Medicina"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref033","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7710\/2162-3309.2258","article-title":"Citing retracted papers affects education and librarianship, so distorted academic metrics need a correction","year":"2018","journal-title":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 6: eP2199"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref034","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1213","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-016-9854-2","article-title":"Fortifying the corrective nature of post-publication peer review: identifying weakness, use of journal clubs, and rewarding conscientious behavior","volume":"23","year":"2017","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref035","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1007\/s12109-016-9476-1","article-title":"Legends in science: from boom to bust","volume":"32","year":"2016","journal-title":"Publishing Research Quarterly"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref036","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e64841","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0064841","article-title":"Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services","volume":"8","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"48","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref037","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13278-017-0466-x","article-title":"Social impact assessment of scientist from mainstream news and weblogs","volume":"7","year":"2017","journal-title":"Social Network Analysis and Mining"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref038","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","article-title":"Cooperation and liaison between universities and editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice","year":"2017","DOI":"10.1101\/139170"},{"key":"key2019091713111426600_ref053a","unstructured":"Wiley (2019), available at: https:\/\/authorservices.wiley.com\/editors\/ethical-guidelines\/managing-complaints\/index.html; https:\/\/authorservices.wiley.com\/ethics-guidelines\/research-integrity.html; https:\/\/authorservices.wiley.com\/asset\/Ethics_Guidelines_7.06.17.pdf"},{"issue":"8","key":"key2019091713111426600_ref039","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662516649806","article-title":"The case of #arseniclife: Blogs and twitter in informal peer review","volume":"26","year":"2017","journal-title":"Public Understanding of Science"}],"container-title":["Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JICES-05-2018-0051\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JICES-05-2018-0051\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T21:38:25Z","timestamp":1753393105000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jices\/article\/17\/3\/354-370\/210818"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,12]]},"references-count":54,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/JICES-05-2018-0051"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/jices-05-2018-0051","relation":{},"ISSN":["1477-996X","1477-996X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1477-996X","type":"print"},{"value":"1477-996X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,12]]}}}