{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]],"date-time":"2026-05-13T00:10:09Z","timestamp":1778631009838,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":64,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,14]],"date-time":"2020-02-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1581638400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JICES"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,14]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The manner in which people, businesses and governments perform is changing because of the spread of technology. Digitalization of governments can be considered a necessity as we are now entering the era of the Internet-of-Things. The advantages and disadvantages of electronic governments have been examined in several research studies. This study aims to examine the attitudes of decision-makers towards e-government. The research aims are as follows: to determine the problems related with e-government usage, to establish the factors which decrease the usage of e-government services and to propose recommendations for the effective application of e-government practices.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>Qualitative research has been used for the study. Participants were chosen by the snowball sampling method, and face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted with all decision-makers. In-depth interviews are more efficient and enable the acquisition of better qualitative information, in-depth knowledge and statistics, as the distance between the interviewer and interviewee is reduced (Stokes and Bergin, 2006). Questions asked can be categorized under two sections, where the questions in the first section are related to the decision-maker\u2019s management style\/managerial proposition, and in the second section, technological questions are asked in terms of the preferred communication method and the decision-makers\u2019 attitudes towards e-government practices.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>Decision-makers perceive electronic government to be important, while the level of importance is observed to be different among the decision-makers. Chronic problems exist in many countries, such as nepotism, where the decision-makers have conflicting arguments about e-government and the resulting effect on nepotism. Furthermore, the study also indicates that decision-makers are aware of the importance of mobile government, although they acknowledge that more time is required, as their country is still developing. Electronic voting is also perceived to be important, although the decision-makers believe that security and privacy issues need to be solved before related projects can be initiated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>This research can be a benchmark study for the decision-makers of small island developing states by means of e-government. The impediments preventing the effective application of e-government practices are also discussed in the study. This study will be useful to highlight the triggers and obstacles for e-government development in the context of a developing country. Internet penetration has increased significantly since the 2000s, and therefore, decision-makers need to consider the shift in citizens\u2019 behaviour, such as the high usage of smartphones and the emergence of the Internet-of-Things (Kaya and Bicen, 2016; Kumar et al., 2017).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/jices-05-2019-0052","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,20]],"date-time":"2020-02-20T06:03:20Z","timestamp":1582178600000},"page":"609-629","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Qualitative analysis to determine decision-makers\u2019 attitudes towards e-government services in a De-Facto state"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Tu\u011fberk","family":"Kaya","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Mustafa","family":"Sa\u011fsan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tun\u00e7","family":"Medeni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tolga","family":"Medeni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Mete","family":"Y\u0131ld\u0131z","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref001","first-page":"101257","article-title":"Factors for e-voting adoption - analysis of general elections in Nigeria","year":"2017","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2015.06.025","article-title":"The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use","volume":"53","year":"2015","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref003","first-page":"1","article-title":"How to make them use it? Citizens acceptance of M-government","volume":"13","year":"2017","journal-title":"Applied Computing and Informatics"},{"issue":"April","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref004","first-page":"253","article-title":"The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services","volume":"49","year":"2019","journal-title":"International Journal of Information Management"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2019.05.002","article-title":"From citizens to government policy-makers: social media data analysis","volume":"36","year":"2019","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2011.04.004","article-title":"The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations","volume":"29","year":"2012","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref007","first-page":"52","article-title":"Citizens\u2019 engagement on local governments\u2019 Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: the impact of different media and content types in Western Europe","volume":"32","year":"2014","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2011.10.001","article-title":"Local e-government 2.0: social media and corporate transparency in municipalities","volume":"29","year":"2012","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref009","first-page":"27","article-title":"Document analysis as a qualitative research method","year":"2009"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1354","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2019.01.020","article-title":"Decision-makers\u2019 underestimation of user innovation","volume":"48","year":"2019","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref011","volume-title":"L\u2019Intimit\u00e9 au Travail","year":"2011"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref012","first-page":"127","article-title":"Approaches to personal communication","volume-title":"Digital Anthropology","year":"2012"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.4018\/ijpada.2015070102","article-title":"Collaborative governance matters to e-government interoperability: an analysis of citizen-centric integrated interoperable e-government implementation in Saudi Arabia","volume":"2","year":"2015","journal-title":"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (Age)"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref014","unstructured":"Cisco (2015), \u201cCisco visual networking index: forecast and methodology, 2013-2018\u201d, Middle East (Vol. June), available at: www.cisco.com\/en\/US\/solutions\/collateral\/ns341\/ns525\/ns537\/ns705\/ns827\/white_paper_c11-481360_ns827_Networking_Solutions_White_Paper.html"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref015","first-page":"418","article-title":"Towards e-Government 2.0: an assessment of where e-government 2.0 is and where it is headed","volume":"15","year":"2010","journal-title":"Public Administration and Management"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.electstud.2017.03.001","article-title":"Internet voting and turnout: evidence from Switzerland","volume":"47","year":"2017","journal-title":"Electoral Studies"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref026a","volume-title":"The Changing Geographies of International Municipal Relations in Europe \u2013 A Study of British-German Town Twinning Partnerships","year":"2010"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref026b","volume-title":"Langzeitwirkungen von St\u00e4dte-Partnerschaften: Ein Beitrag zur europ\u00e4ischen Integration (Schriftenreihe Europa-Forschung)","year":"1981"},{"issue":"10","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1145\/1022594.1022624","article-title":"Analyzing internet voting security","volume":"47","year":"2004","journal-title":"Communications of the ACM"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref018","volume-title":"The Maturation of Electronic Government Practices in Northern Cyprus: A Comparative Study of Northern and Southern Nicosia","year":"2019"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref019","article-title":"Artificial intelligence driven e-government: the engage model to improve e-decision making","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Digital Government\u2019 (ECDG 2019)","year":"2019"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref020","article-title":"A review of government websites based on usability and e-participation","volume-title":"Contemporary Issues in South Asia, Upcoming","year":"2020"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2016.02.036","article-title":"The effects of social media on students\u2019 behaviors; Facebook as a case study","volume":"59","year":"2016","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref022","first-page":"1201","article-title":"Bakanl\u0131k ve belediye web sitelerinin i\u00e7erik analiz y\u00f6ntemiyle E-Kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u0130ncelenmesi - KKTC \u00f6rne\u011fi","volume":"33","year":"2019","journal-title":"Atat\u00fcrk \u00dcniversitesi \u0130ktisadi ve \u0130dari Bilimler Dergisi"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref023","first-page":"11","article-title":"Key success factors for e-participation maturity levels: a proposal for case study of Northern Cyprus municipalities","volume":"1","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of Management Information Systems"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref024","first-page":"1","article-title":"A situation analysis for Northern Cyprus municipalities: key success factors for effective participation","volume":"8","year":"2016","journal-title":"International Journal of Ebusiness and Egovernment Studies"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref025","article-title":"Citizens\u2019 attitudes towards e-government services: comparison of Northern and Southern Nicosia municipalities","year":"2020","journal-title":"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2012.04.006","article-title":"Strategic e-government development and the role of benchmarking","volume":"29","year":"2012","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2017.02.023","article-title":"Qualitative approach to determine user experience of e-government services","volume":"71","year":"2017","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2012.07.007","article-title":"Seeking electronic information from government resources: a comparative analysis of two communities\u2019 web searching of municipal government websites","volume":"30","year":"2013","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"21","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref026c","first-page":"3","article-title":"50 Jahre Europ\u00e4ische Partnerschaftsbewegung: St\u00e4dte initiieren gr\u00f6\u00dfte \u2018Friedensbewegung\u2019 Europas","volume":"1","year":"1997","journal-title":"EUROPA Kommunal"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-08081-9_3","article-title":"Moving toward Web 2.0-enhanced e-government in small-town PA","volume-title":"Case Studies in e-Government 2.0","year":"2015"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2012.06.003","article-title":"From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media","volume":"29","year":"2012","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref031","unstructured":"Lucchi, M. (2017), \u201cThis is how Switzerland\u2019s direct democracy works\u201d, available at: http:\/\/amp.weforum.org\/agenda\/2017\/07\/switzerland-direct-democracy-explained"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref032","first-page":"174","article-title":"A case study in the application market: behavior of play store customers","year":"2016"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref033","first-page":"511","article-title":"What drives fidelity to internet voting? Evidence from the roll-out of internet voting in Switzerland","volume":"34","year":"2016","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref034","unstructured":"Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2017), \u201cCyprus (historical overview)\u201d, available at: www.mfa.gov.tr\/cyprus-_historical-overview_.en.mfa"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2010.05.008","article-title":"Electronic administration in Spain: from its beginnings to the present","volume":"28","year":"2011","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2013.09.006","article-title":"Determining the type of e-government use","volume":"31","year":"2014","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref037","volume-title":"M-Government: Mobile Technologies for Responsive Governments and Connected Societies","author":"OECD\/International Telecommunication Union","year":"2011"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref038","volume-title":"Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How?","year":"2008"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref039","article-title":"Public services 2.0: web 2.0 from the periphery to the Centre of public","year":"2009"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref040","article-title":"Increasing validity in qualitative research [streaming video]","year":"2017","journal-title":"SAGE Research Methods"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref041","first-page":"165","article-title":"Digital politics and political engagement","volume-title":"Digital Anthropology","year":"2012"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2012.01.003","article-title":"E-voting intent: a comparison of young and elderly voters","volume":"29","year":"2012","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref043","volume-title":"The Diffusion of Innovations","year":"1995","edition":"4th ed."},{"issue":"10","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"860","DOI":"10.1016\/j.telpol.2017.12.002","article-title":"Vision of future e-government via new e-government maturity model: based on Korea\u2019s e-government practices","volume":"42","year":"2018","journal-title":"Telecommunications Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2015.06.004","article-title":"Evaluating the use and impact of web 2.0 technologies in local government","volume":"32","year":"2015","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref046","first-page":"26e37","article-title":"Methodology or \u2018methodolatry\u2019? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews","volume":"9","year":"2006","journal-title":"Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref047","volume-title":"Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques","year":"1990"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2011.11.005","article-title":"EParticipation research: systematizing the field","volume":"29","year":"2012","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref049","first-page":"225","article-title":"Digital engagement: voice and participation in development","volume-title":"Digital Anthropology","year":"2012"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref050","unstructured":"The World Bank (2019), \u201cIndividuals using the internet (% of population)\u201d, available at: https:\/\/data.worldbank.org\/indicator\/IT.NET.USER.ZS"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref051","unstructured":"United Nations (2018), \u201cE-Government survey 2018\u201d, available at: https:\/\/publicadministration.un.org\/egovkb\/en-us\/Reports\/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2014.01.034","article-title":"Antecedents and consequences of perceived value in mobile government continuance use: an empirical research in China","volume":"34","year":"2014","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref053","volume-title":"Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance","year":"2005"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref054","volume-title":"e-Government Strategy Process Instruments","year":"2015"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2012.10.007","article-title":"E-government discourses: an inductive analysis","volume":"30","year":"2013","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref056","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2007.01.002","article-title":"E-government research: reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward","volume":"24","year":"2007","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref057","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2014.02.007","article-title":"Revisiting Alabama state website accessibility","volume":"31","year":"2014","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref058","article-title":"The digital revolution, innovation and the global context","year":"2016"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020102011085860200_ref059","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2013.10.009","article-title":"COBRA framework to evaluate e-government services: a citizen-centric perspective","volume":"31","year":"2014","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref060","first-page":"409","article-title":"E-government in the TRNC","year":"2010","journal-title":"In Comparative E-Government"},{"key":"key2020102011085860200_ref061","article-title":"E-Government survey 2004","author":"United Nations","year":"2004"}],"container-title":["Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JICES-05-2019-0052\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JICES-05-2019-0052\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T21:38:25Z","timestamp":1753393105000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jices\/article\/18\/4\/609-629\/227686"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,14]]},"references-count":64,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,14]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/JICES-05-2019-0052"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/jices-05-2019-0052","relation":{},"ISSN":["1477-996X","1477-996X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1477-996X","type":"print"},{"value":"1477-996X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,14]]}}}