{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T17:34:47Z","timestamp":1754156087824,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":116,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,14]],"date-time":"2018-05-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1526256000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JSIT"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,14]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper first aims to examine how business process change decisions (BPCDs) were implemented in a government organisation bound by tightly coupled temporal constraints (TTCs). Second, it focuses on how to achieve optimal and efficient BPCDs that require tight compliance with regulators\u2019 temporal constraints. Finally, it formulates a rigorous framework that can facilitate the execution of optimal BPCDs with maximum efficiency and minimal effort, time and cost.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>Decision-making biases by individuals or groups in organisations can impede optimal BPC implementation; to demonstrate this, a case study is investigated and the formulated framework is applied to tackle these failings.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>The case study analysis shows 76 per cent of the BPCDs implemented were inefficient, mostly because of poor decisions, and these resulted in negative ripple effects. In response, the newly developed hierarchical change management structure (HCMS) framework was used to empower organisations to execute high-velocity BPCDs, enabling them to handle any temporal constraints imposed by regulators or other exogenous factors. The HCMS framework was found to be highly effective, scoring an average improvement of more than 100 per cent when measured using decision quality dimensions. This paper would be of value for business executives and strategic decision makers engaging with BPC.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Research limitations\/implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>The HCMS framework has been applied in a single case study as a proof of concept. Future research could extend its application to broader domains that have multi-attribute structures and environments. The evaluation processes of the proposed framework are based on subjective metrics. Causal links from the framework to business process metrics will provide a more complete performance picture.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>The outcome of this research assists in formulating a systematic BPCD framework that is otherwise unavailable. The practical use of the proposed framework would potentially impact on quality outcomes for organisations. The model is derived from decision trees and analytical hierarchical processes and is tailored to address this problematic area. The proposed HCMS framework would help organisations to execute efficient BPCDs with minimal time, effort and cost. The HCMS framework contributes to the academic literature on BPCD that leverages diverse stakeholders to engage in BPC initiatives.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>The research presents a novel framework \u2013HCMS \u2013 that provides a platform for organisations to easily determine and solve hierarchical decision structure problems, thereby allowing them to efficiently automate and institutionalise optimal BPCDs.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/jsit-08-2017-0069","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,16]],"date-time":"2018-05-16T07:14:27Z","timestamp":1526454867000},"page":"207-240","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Formulating optimal business process change decisions using a computational hierarchical change management structure framework"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Abdulrahman","family":"Alrabiah","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Steve","family":"Drew","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1016\/0040-1625(75)90015-3","article-title":"Technology, productivity and process change","volume":"7","year":"1975","journal-title":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1108\/14637150510578719","article-title":"Developing and evaluating a methodology for business process improvement","volume":"11","year":"2005","journal-title":"Business Process Management Journal"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1007\/s40685-016-0035-6","article-title":"An economic decision model for determining the appropriate level of business process standardization","volume":"9","year":"2016","journal-title":"Business Research"},{"unstructured":"Al-Harbi, K. (2012), \u201cWhy will Hafiz aid end this year?\u201d, available at: http:\/\/saudigazette.com.sa\/article\/2432\/What-will-happen-to-Hafiz?","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref004"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1108\/14637159910249108","article-title":"BPR implementation process: an analysis of key success and failure factors","volume":"5","year":"1999","journal-title":"Business Process Management Journal"},{"issue":"8","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1119","DOI":"10.1080\/17517575.2016.1161238","article-title":"Survey of business process management: challenges and solutions","volume":"11","year":"2017","journal-title":"Enterprise Information Systems"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref007","article-title":"Deriving organisational business process change factors using the hierarchical elicitation workshop","volume":"9","year":"2018","journal-title":"International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management"},{"volume-title":"Critical Factors in the Adoption and Diffusion of E-Government Initiatives in Oman","year":"2006","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref008"},{"unstructured":"Aluwaisheg, A. (2012), \u201cEmployment incentives should not become a welfare program\u201d, available at: www.arabnews.com\/%5Btermalias-raw%5D\/employment-incentives-should-not-become-welfare-program","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref009"},{"unstructured":"Amiyo, M., Nabukenya, J. and Sol, H.G. (2010), \u201cDecision enhancement and improving business process agility\u201d, paper presented at the 6th Annual International Conference on Computing and ICT Research (ICCIR 2010).","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref010"},{"unstructured":"Amiyo, M.R. (2012), \u201cDecision enhancement and business process agility\u201d, PhD Thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref011"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1108\/02635579110001668","article-title":"A strategic planning model: structuring and analysing via the analytic hierarchy process","volume":"91","year":"1991","journal-title":"Industrial Management & Data Systems"},{"unstructured":"Andrade, E., van der Aa, H., Leopold, H., Alter, S. and Reijers, H. (2016), \u201cFactors leading to business process noncompliance and its positive and negative effects: empirical insights from a case study\u201d, paper presented at the 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2016, San Diego, CA, 11-14 August.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref013"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2017.08.151","article-title":"A conceptual framework for social business process management","volume":"112","year":"2017","journal-title":"Procedia Computer Science"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1504\/IJISE.2012.046298","article-title":"System dynamics as a useful technique for complex systems","volume":"10","year":"2012","journal-title":"International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1057\/palgrave.ejis.3000546","article-title":"Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study","volume":"14","year":"2005","journal-title":"European Journal of Information Systems"},{"unstructured":"Barbacci, M.R., Ellison, R.J., Lattanze, A., Stafford, J., Weinstock, C.B. and Wood, W. (2003), Quality Attribute Workshops (QAWs), Pittsburgh, available at: http:\/\/resources.sei.cmu.edu\/library\/asset-view.cfm?assetID=6687","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref017"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref018","first-page":"59","article-title":"System dynamics: systemic feedback modeling for policy analysis","volume":"1","year":"2007","journal-title":"System"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref019","first-page":"133","article-title":"Process capital as strategic success factor","volume-title":"Handbook on Business Process Management","year":"2015"},{"volume-title":"A Virtual Organisation Model for E-Government","year":"2007","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref020"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref021","first-page":"45","article-title":"Delivering business strategy through process management","volume-title":"Handbook on Business Process Management","year":"2015"},{"volume-title":"Business Analysis Techniques: 72 Essential Tools for Success: BCS","year":"2010","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref022"},{"volume-title":"Making Sense of Change Management: A Complete Guide to the Models, Tools and Techniques of Organizational Change","year":"2015","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref023"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref024","article-title":"A method for eliciting goals for business process models based on non-functional requirements catalogues","volume":"226","year":"2013","journal-title":"Frameworks for Developing Efficient Information Systems: Models, Theory, and Practice: Models, Theory, and Practice"},{"volume-title":"Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches","year":"2013","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref025"},{"volume-title":"Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology","year":"2013","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref026"},{"volume-title":"The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign","year":"1990","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref027"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.2307\/249760","article-title":"Reengineering: business change of mythic proportions?","volume":"18","year":"1994","journal-title":"Mis Quarterly"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.2753\/MIS0742-1222250403","article-title":"How knowledge validation processes affect knowledge contribution","volume":"25","year":"2009","journal-title":"Journal of Management Information Systems"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2017.08.006","article-title":"The moderating effect of external pressure on the relationship between internal organizational factors and the quality of open government data","volume":"34","year":"2017","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref031","first-page":"11","article-title":"The business process maturity model. A practical approach for identifying opportunities for optimization","volume":"9","year":"2004","journal-title":"Business Process Trends"},{"volume-title":"Road Maps: A Guide to Learning System Dynamics","year":"1997","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref032"},{"volume-title":"Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change","year":"2001","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref033"},{"unstructured":"Goedertier, S. and Vanthienen, J. (2006), \u201cCompliant and flexible business processes with business rules\u201d, paper presented at the 7th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development and Support (BPMDS\u201906) at CAiSE\u201906.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref034"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref035","first-page":"S61","article-title":"From policy implementation to business process management: principles for creating flexibility and agility","volume":"29","year":"2012","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gong, Y. and Janssen, M. (2017), \u201cThe impact of social business process management on policy-making in e-government\u201d, paper presented at the Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref036","DOI":"10.24251\/HICSS.2017.297"},{"volume-title":"Decision Analysis for Management Judgment","year":"2014","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref037"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1109\/17.740036","article-title":"From business reengineering to business process change management: a longitudinal study of trends and practices","volume":"46","year":"1999","journal-title":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management"},{"volume-title":"Business Process Change: Reengineering Concepts, Methods and Technologies","year":"1998","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref039"},{"volume-title":"Process Think: Winning Perspectives for Business Change in the Information Age","year":"2000","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref040"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref041","first-page":"327","article-title":"A framework for business process change requirements analysis","volume-title":"Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective","year":"2009"},{"volume-title":"Successful Decision-Making: A Systematic Approach to Complex Problems","year":"2013","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref042"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1080\/07421222.1997.11518156","article-title":"Business process change and organizational performance: exploring an antecedent model","volume":"14","year":"1997","journal-title":"Journal of Management Information Systems"},{"volume-title":"Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications","year":"2011","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref044"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref045","first-page":"104","article-title":"Reengineering work: don\u2019t automate, obliterate","volume":"68","year":"1990","journal-title":"Harvard Business Review"},{"volume-title":"Reengineering the Corporation: Manifesto for Business Revolution","year":"2009","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref046"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref047","first-page":"21","article-title":"Business process change design from decision model perspective","volume":"9","year":"2003","journal-title":"Management Science and Financial Engineering"},{"volume-title":"Business Process Change: A Manager\u2019s Guide to Improving, Redesigning, and Automating Processes","year":"2003","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref048"},{"volume-title":"Business Process Change: A Guide for Business Managers and Bpm and Six Sigma Professionals","year":"2010","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref049"},{"volume-title":"Business Process Change","year":"2014","edition":"3rd ed.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref050"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref051","first-page":"37","article-title":"The scope and evolution of business process management","volume-title":"Handbook on Business Process Management","year":"2015"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref052","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.9707\/1944-5660.1209","article-title":"Ripple effects of process change","volume":"6","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Foundation Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1108\/18325911211273518","article-title":"The causal relationships between performance drivers and outcomes: reinforcing balanced scorecards\u2019 implementation through system dynamics models","volume":"8","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref054","first-page":"153","article-title":"Business process frameworks","volume-title":"Handbook on Business Process Management","year":"2015"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/07421222.1997.11518155","article-title":"Balance in business reengineering: an empirical study of fit and performance","volume":"14","year":"1997","journal-title":"Journal of Management Information Systems"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref056","article-title":"A methodology for a business process change in public sector","volume":"38","year":"2005","journal-title":"Systems Integration"},{"unstructured":"Javidroozi, V., Amini, A., Cole, A. and Shah, H. (2014), \u201cBusiness process change in enterprise systems integration: challenges and opportunities\u201d, paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2014).","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref057"},{"unstructured":"Javidroozi, V., Shah, H., Amini, A. and Feldman, G. (2016), \u201cBusiness process change: a guide for implementers\u201d, paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government (EEE).","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref058"},{"year":"2014","article-title":"IT-enabled business process change in private and in public sector organizations","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref059"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1108\/BPMJ-01-2015-0002","article-title":"Emergent risks in business process change projects","volume":"22","year":"2016","journal-title":"Business Process Management Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref061","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.2979\/eservicej.9.1.3","article-title":"Key differences of private and public sector business process change","volume":"9","year":"2013","journal-title":"e-Service Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1108\/BPMJ-11-2012-0125","article-title":"Which capabilities matter for successful business process change?","volume":"20","year":"2014","journal-title":"Business Process Management Journal"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jurisch, M., Cuno, J., Palka, W., Wolf, P. and Krcmar, H. (2012), \u201cAn integrative model of IT-enabled business process change: causal structures in theory, research and practice\u201d, paper presented at the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS).","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref063","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2012.105"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref064","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/S0306-4379(99)00015-0","article-title":"Goal-driven business process analysis application in electricity deregulation","volume":"24","year":"1999","journal-title":"Information Systems"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kherbouche, O.M., Ahmad, A., Bouneffa, M. and Basson, H. (2013), \u201cAnalyzing the ripple effects of change in business process models\u201d, paper presented at the Multi Topic Conference (INMIC), 2013 16th International.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref065","DOI":"10.1109\/INMIC.2013.6731320"},{"volume-title":"Decision Making and Programming: World Scientific","year":"2003","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref066"},{"volume-title":"Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research","year":"2014","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref067"},{"volume-title":"Information Technology and Organizational Learning: Managing Behavioral Change in the Digital Age","year":"2017","edition":"3rd ed.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref068"},{"unstructured":"Lau, E. (2003), \u201cChallenges for e-government development\u201d, paper presented at the 5th Global Forum on Reinventing Government.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref069"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2014.01.006","article-title":"REGNET: Regulatory information management, compliance and analysis","volume":"31","year":"2014","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"volume-title":"Change Impact Analysis of Object-Oriented Software","year":"1998","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref071"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref072","first-page":"67","article-title":"Systems dynamics modeling for collaboration and information sharing on supply chain performance and value creation","volume":"2","year":"2012","journal-title":"International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L\u00f6nn, C.M. and Uppstr\u00f6m, E. (2013), \u201cProcess management challenges in swedish public sector: a bottom up initiative\u201d, paper presented at the International Conference on Electronic Government.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref073","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40358-3_18"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref074","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1147\/sj.321.0198","article-title":"Transforming the enterprise: the alignment of business and information technology strategies","volume":"32","year":"1993","journal-title":"IBM Systems Journal"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1002\/sdr.280","article-title":"Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models","volume":"19","year":"2003","journal-title":"System Dynamics Review"},{"issue":"7","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref076","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1108\/02635579910262535","article-title":"A framework for selecting business process modeling methods","volume":"99","year":"1999","journal-title":"Industrial Management & Data Systems"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref078","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1108\/13673271111137402","article-title":"Developing organisational decision-making capability: a knowledge manager\u2019s guide","volume":"15","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Knowledge Management"},{"volume-title":"Decision Analysis for the Professional","year":"2005","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref079"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref077","first-page":"195","article-title":"Decision analysis = decision engineering","volume-title":"2005 Tutorials in Operations Research: Emerging Theory, Methods, and Applications","year":"2005"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2575.2000.00075.x","article-title":"A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling","volume":"10","year":"2000","journal-title":"Information Systems Journal"},{"volume-title":"A Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Critical Success Factors in Strategic Change Programme Implementation: A Case Study of a Global Industrial Company in the Energy Sector","year":"2014","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref081"},{"year":"2011","journal-title":"The Case of the Greek Public Administration","article-title":"Applying business process change (BPC) to implement multi-agency collaboration","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref082"},{"volume-title":"Business Analysis","year":"2014","edition":"3rd ed.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref083"},{"year":"2008","article-title":"Towards a classification and lifecycle of business process change","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref084"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00116251","article-title":"Induction of decision trees","volume":"1","year":"1986","journal-title":"Machine Learning"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref086","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2005.05.031","article-title":"A business process context for knowledge management","volume":"43","year":"2007","journal-title":"Decision Support Systems"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref087","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2011.10.014","article-title":"Building ontology based knowledge maps to assist business process re-engineering","volume":"52","year":"2012","journal-title":"Decision Support Systems"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref088","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.datak.2004.01.002","article-title":"Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems \u2013 a survey","volume":"50","year":"2004","journal-title":"Data & Knowledge Engineering"},{"unstructured":"Rosenberg, Z., Jurisch, M., Schermann, M. and Krcmar, H. (2014), \u201cUsing case survey methodology to extract variables and causal links: an example from studying business process change\u201d, paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Wiley, Delft.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref089"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-2496(77)90033-5","article-title":"A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures","volume":"15","year":"1977","journal-title":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology"},{"volume-title":"Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World","year":"1990","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref091"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref092","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(90)90057-I","article-title":"How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process","volume":"48","year":"1990","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref093","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1504\/IJSSCI.2008.017590","article-title":"Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process","volume":"1","year":"2008","journal-title":"International Journal of Services Sciences"},{"unstructured":"Scholl, H. (2004), \u201cCurrent practices in e-government-induced business process change (BPC)\u201d, paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2004 annual national conference on Digital government research.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref094"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1108\/BPMJ-Jun-2012-0064","article-title":"Business process management: a systemic approach?","volume":"19","year":"2013","journal-title":"Business Process Management Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref096","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008763603052","article-title":"Decision-centric information monitoring","volume":"14","year":"2000","journal-title":"Journal of Intelligent Information Systems"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref097","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"971","DOI":"10.1108\/BPMJ-02-2013-0020","article-title":"A process model of managing organizational change during business process redesign","volume":"20","year":"2014","journal-title":"Business Process Management Journal"},{"key":"key2020092901520657800_ref098","first-page":"493","article-title":"Rational decision making in business organizations","year":"1979","journal-title":"The American Economic Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref099","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijinfomgt.2012.05.011","article-title":"Increasing process orientation with business process management: critical practices","volume":"33","year":"2013","journal-title":"International Journal of Information Management"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8551.2008.00594.x","article-title":"Understanding business process management: implications for theory and practice","volume":"20","year":"2009","journal-title":"British Journal of Management"},{"issue":"11","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0101","first-page":"68","article-title":"A leader\u2019s framework for decision making","volume":"85","year":"2007","journal-title":"Harvard Business Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1002\/spip.242","article-title":"Scope analysis: identifying the impact of changes in business process models","volume":"10","year":"2005","journal-title":"Software Process: Improvement and Practice"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijinfomgt.2007.02.006","article-title":"Towards E-government by business process change \u2013 a methodology for public sector","volume":"27","year":"2007","journal-title":"International Journal of Information Management"},{"volume-title":"Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World with Cd-Rom","year":"2000","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0104"},{"issue":"89","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1002\/ev.3","article-title":"Evaluation models","volume":"2001","year":"2001","journal-title":"New Directions for Evaluation"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijpe.2012.03.036","article-title":"A review of applications of analytic hierarchy process in operations management","volume":"138","year":"2012","journal-title":"International Journal of Production Economics"},{"volume-title":"Business Process Change","year":"2008","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0107"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0108","first-page":"35","article-title":"Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges","volume":"2","year":"1995","journal-title":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.003","article-title":"The critical success factors of business process management","volume":"30","year":"2010","journal-title":"International Journal of Information Management"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vanhoenacker, J., Bryant, A. and Dedene, G. (1999), \u201cCreating a knowledge management architecture for business process change\u201d, paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0110","DOI":"10.1145\/299513.299690"},{"year":"2017","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly","article-title":"Towards a typology of adaptive governance in the digital government context: the role of decision-making and accountability","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0111"},{"volume-title":"Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures","year":"2012","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0112"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-7206(01)00099-4","article-title":"A model for implementing BPR based on strategic perspectives: an empirical study","volume":"39","year":"2002","journal-title":"Information & Management"},{"unstructured":"Yau, S.S., Collofello, J.S. and MacGregor, T. (1978), \u201cRipple effect analysis of software maintenance\u201d, paper presented at the Computer Software and Applications Conference, 1978. COMPSAC\u201978. The IEEE Computer Society\u2019s Second International.","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0114"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1108\/14637159710161585","article-title":"Business process management: a boundaryless approach to modern competitiveness","volume":"3","year":"1997","journal-title":"Business Process Management Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020092901520657800_ref0116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2013.04.003","article-title":"Open data policies, their implementation and impact: a framework for comparison","volume":"31","year":"2014","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"}],"container-title":["Journal of Systems and Information Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JSIT-08-2017-0069\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/JSIT-08-2017-0069\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T22:23:54Z","timestamp":1753395834000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/jsit\/article\/20\/2\/207-240\/248362"}},"subtitle":["A case study"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,14]]},"references-count":116,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,14]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/JSIT-08-2017-0069"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/jsit-08-2017-0069","relation":{},"ISSN":["1328-7265"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1328-7265"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,14]]}}}