{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T02:31:55Z","timestamp":1772159515137,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,24]],"date-time":"2021-08-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1629763200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["OIR"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,2]]},"abstract":"\n Purpose<\/jats:title>\n The purpose of this study is to explore current practices, challenges and technological needs of different data repositories.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n An online survey was designed for data repository managers, and contact information from the re3data, a data repository registry, was collected to disseminate the survey.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Findings<\/jats:title>\n In total, 189 responses were received, including 47% discipline specific and 34% institutional data repositories. A total of 71% of the repositories reporting their software used bespoke technical frameworks, with DSpace, EPrint and Dataverse being commonly used by institutional repositories. Of repository managers, 32% reported tracking secondary data reuse while 50% would like to. Among data reuse metrics, citation counts were considered extremely important by the majority, followed by links to the data from other websites and download counts. Despite their perceived usefulness, repository managers struggle to track dataset citations. Most repository managers support dataset and metadata quality checks via librarians, subject specialists or information professionals. A lack of engagement from users and a lack of human resources are the top two challenges, and outreach is the most common motivator mentioned by repositories across all groups. Ensuring findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) data (49%), providing user support for research (36%) and developing best practices (29%) are the top three priorities for repository managers. The main recommendations for future repository systems are as follows: integration and interoperability between data and systems (30%), better research data management (RDM) tools (19%), tools that allow computation without downloading datasets (16%) and automated systems (16%).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n This study identifies the current challenges and needs for improving data repository functionalities and user experiences.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Peer review<\/jats:title>\n \n The peer review history for this article is available at:\n https:\/\/publons.com\/publon\/10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204<\/jats:ext-link>\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/oir-04-2021-0204","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,20]],"date-time":"2021-08-20T03:57:56Z","timestamp":1629431876000},"page":"483-502","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Are data repositories fettered? A survey of current practices, challenges and future technologies"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"46","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4521-0920","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nushrat","family":"Khan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6065-205X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mike","family":"Thelwall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4827-971X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kayvan","family":"Kousha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"140","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"key2022060118553972900_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5334\/dsj-2016-006","article-title":"Are scientific data repositories coping with research data publishing?","volume":"15","year":"2016","journal-title":"Data Science Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref002","article-title":"Revisiting qualitative data reuse: a decade on","volume":"7","year":"2017","journal-title":"Sage Open"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_ref003","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1007\/s13222-019-00315-w","article-title":"Towards semantic integration of federated research data","volume":"19","year":"2019","journal-title":"Datenbank Spektrum"},{"issue":"19","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1849","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa1603542","article-title":"Use of the national heart, lung, and blood institute data repository","volume":"376","year":"2017","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref005","article-title":"The citation advantage of linking publications to research data","volume":"15","year":"2020","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_ref006","article-title":"The value of research data\u2013metrics for datasets from a cultural and technical point of view","year":"2013"},{"issue":"9","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2182","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23781","article-title":"Developments in research data management in academic libraries: towards an understanding of research data service maturity","volume":"68","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"1926","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4023","DOI":"10.1098\/rsta.2010.0165","article-title":"Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories","volume":"368","year":"2010","journal-title":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_ref009","unstructured":"Faniel, I.M. and Yakel, E. (2017), \u201cPractices do not make perfect: disciplinary data sharing and reuse practices and their implications for repository data curation\u201d, in Curating Research Data, Volume One: Practical Strategies for Your Digital Repository, Vol. 1, pp. 103-126."},{"issue":"6","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1404","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23480","article-title":"Social scientists' satisfaction with data reuse","volume":"67","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"6","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0129506","article-title":"Biomedical data sharing and reuse: attitudes and practices of clinical and scientific research staff","volume":"10","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref012","first-page":"1","article-title":"A data citation roadmap for scholarly data repositories","volume":"6","year":"2019","journal-title":"Scientific Data"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_ref013","volume-title":"How to Design Survey Studies","year":"2003"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_ref014","unstructured":"Goldstein, S. (2017), \u201cThe evolving landscape of federated research data infrastructures\u201d, available at: https:\/\/www.rd-alliance.org\/sites\/default\/files\/attachment\/The_Evolving_Landscape_of_Federated_Research_Data_Infrastructures.pdf."},{"issue":"2","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/S1532-0464(02)00500-2","article-title":"Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies","volume":"35","year":"2002","journal-title":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","article-title":"FAIRness of repositories and their data: a report from LIBER's research data management working group","year":"2019","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.3251593"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.patter.2020.100007","article-title":"Identifying data sharing and reuse with Scholix: potentials and limitations","volume":"1","year":"2020","journal-title":"Patterns"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3621","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-021-03890-6","article-title":"Measuring the impact of biodiversity datasets: data reuse, citations and altmetrics","volume":"126","year":"2021","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"12","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2709","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23892","article-title":"Scientists' data reuse behaviors: a multilevel analysis","volume":"68","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref020","article-title":"Assessing the impact and quality of research data using altmetrics and other indicators","volume":"2","year":"2020","journal-title":"Scholarly Assessment Reports"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref021","first-page":"1","article-title":"Making data count","volume":"2","year":"2015","journal-title":"Scientific Data"},{"issue":"11","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref022","article-title":"Making research data repositories visible: the re3data.org registry","volume":"8","year":"2013","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.5334\/dsj-2017-008","article-title":"On the reuse of scientific data","volume":"16","year":"2017","journal-title":"Data Science Journal"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_ref024","unstructured":"Patel, D. (2019), \u201cHow Google's dataset search engine work\u201d, available at: https:\/\/towardsdatascience.com\/how-googles-dataset-search-engine-work-928fa5237787 (accessed 31 March 2021)."},{"issue":"12","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref025","article-title":"Research data management and libraries: relationships, activities, drivers and influences","volume":"9","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"12","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2964","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23529","article-title":"Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index","volume":"67","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_ref027","unstructured":"Shearer, K. and Furtado, F. (2017), \u201cCOAR survey of research data management: results\u201d, available at: https:\/\/www.coar-repositories.org\/files\/COAR-RDM-Survey-Jan-2017.pdf."},{"issue":"2","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref028","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0229578","article-title":"Is useful research data usually shared? An investigation of genome-wide association study summary statistics","volume":"15","year":"2020","journal-title":"Plos One"},{"issue":"7","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref029","article-title":"If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology","volume":"8","year":"2013","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref030","first-page":"1","article-title":"The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship","volume":"3","year":"2016","journal-title":"Scientific Data"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022060118553972900_ref031","first-page":"1","article-title":"Red flags in data: learning from failed data reuse experiences","volume":"53","year":"2016","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_fur1","first-page":"1","article-title":"The Scholix framework for interoperability in data-literature information exchange","volume":"23","year":"2017","journal-title":"D-Lib Magazine"},{"key":"key2022060118553972900_fur2"}],"container-title":["Online Information Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T22:42:47Z","timestamp":1753396967000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/oir\/article\/46\/3\/483-502\/318453"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,24]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/oir-04-2021-0204","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204\/v1\/review2","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204\/v1\/review1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204\/v1\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204\/v2\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204\/v2\/review2","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204\/v2\/review1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1108\/OIR-04-2021-0204\/v2\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1468-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1468-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,24]]}}}