{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T17:39:34Z","timestamp":1754156374957,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,8]],"date-time":"2016-08-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1470614400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n               <jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p> \u2013 The purpose of this paper is to focus on examining the research impact of papers written with and without funding. Specifically, the citation analysis method is used to compare the general and funded papers published in two leading international conferences, which are ACM SIGIR and ACM SIGKDD. <\/jats:p>\n            <\/jats:sec>\n            <jats:sec>\n               <jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p> \u2013 The authors investigate the number of general and funded papers to see whether the number of funded papers is larger than the number of general papers. In addition, the total citations and the number of highly cited papers with and without funding are also compared. <\/jats:p>\n            <\/jats:sec>\n            <jats:sec>\n               <jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p> \u2013 The analysis results of ACM SIGIR papers show that in most cases the number of funded papers is larger than the number of general papers. Moreover, the total captions, the average number of citations per paper, and the number of highly cited papers all reveal the superiority of funded papers over general papers. However, the findings are somewhat different for the ACM SIGKDD papers. This may be because ACM SIGIR began much earlier than ACM SIGKDD, which relates to the maturity of the research problems addressed in these two conferences. <\/jats:p>\n            <\/jats:sec>\n            <jats:sec>\n               <jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p> \u2013 The value of this paper is the first attempt at examining the research impact of general and funded research papers by the citation analysis method. The research impact of other research areas can be further investigated by other analysis methods.<\/jats:p>\n            <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/oir-08-2015-0249","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,4]],"date-time":"2016-08-04T06:42:53Z","timestamp":1470292973000},"page":"472-480","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Research impact of general and funded papers"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"Cheng-Che","family":"Shen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ya-Han","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Wei-Chao","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Chih-Fong","family":"Tsai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Shih-Wen","family":"Ke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clarke, R.\n                (2009), \u201cA citation analysis of Australian information systems researchers: towards a new era?\u201d, \n                  Australasian Journal of Information Systems\n               , Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 23-44.","DOI":"10.3127\/ajis.v15i2.465"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Costas, R.\n                and \n                  van Leeuwen, T.\n                (2012), \u201cApproaching the \u2018reward triangle\u2019: general analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgements and \u2018peer interactive communication\u2019 in scientific publications\u201d, \n                  Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology\n               , Vol. 63 No. 8, pp. 1647-1661.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22692"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cronin, B.\n                and \n                  Meho, L.\n                (2006), \u201cUsing the h-index to rank influential information scientists\u201d, \n                  Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology\n               , Vol. 57 No. 9, pp. 1275-1278.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.20354"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Egghe, L.\n                (2006), \u201cTheory and practice of the g-index\u201d, \n                  Scientometrics\n               , Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 131-152.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-006-0144-7"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garfield, E.\n                (2006), \u201cThe history and meaning of the journal impact factor\u201d, \n                  Journal of the American Medical Association\n               , Vol. 295 No. 1, pp. 90-93.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.295.1.90"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haddow, G.\n                and \n                  Genoni, P.\n                (2010), \u201cCitation analysis and peer ranking of Australian social science journals\u201d, \n                  Scientometrics\n               , Vol. 85 No. 2, pp. 471-487.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-010-0198-4"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hirsch, J.E.\n                (2005), \u201cAn index to quantify an individual\u2019s scientific research output\u201d, \n                  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences\n               , Vol. 102 No. 46, pp. 16569-16572.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.0507655102"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hu, P.J.\n                and \n                  Chen, H.\n                (2011), \u201cAnalyzing information systems researchers\u2019 productivity and impacts: a perspective on the h index\u201d, \n                  ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems\n               , Vol. 2 No. 2, Article No. 7.","DOI":"10.1145\/1985347.1985348"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Katerattanakul, P.\n               , \n                  Han, B.\n                and \n                  Hong, S.\n                (2003), \u201cObjective quality ranking of computing journals\u201d, \n                  Communications of the ACM\n               , Vol. 46 No. 10, pp. 111-114.","DOI":"10.1145\/944217.944221"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mingers, J.\n               , \n                  Macri, F.\n                and \n                  Petrovici, D.\n                (2012), \u201cUsing the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and management\u201d, \n                  Information Processing & Management\n               , Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 234-241.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ipm.2011.03.009"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vanclay, J.K.\n                (2008), \u201cRanking forestry journals using the h-index\u201d, \n                  Journal of Informetrics\n               , Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 326-334.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2008.07.002"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, J.\n                and \n                  Shapira, P.\n                (2011), \u201cFunding acknowledgment analysis \u2013 an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology\u201d, \n                  Scientometrics\n               , Vol. 87 No. 3, pp. 563-586.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-011-0362-5"},{"key":"key2020121321000206100_b13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, J.\n                and \n                  Shapira, P.\n                (2015), \u201cIs there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgements in nanotechnology papers\u201d, \n                  PLoS ONE\n               , Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 1-19.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0117727"}],"container-title":["Online Information Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/OIR-08-2015-0249","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/OIR-08-2015-0249\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/OIR-08-2015-0249\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T22:43:33Z","timestamp":1753397013000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/oir\/article\/40\/4\/472-480\/314839"}},"subtitle":["A citation analysis of two ACM international conference proceeding series"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,8]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/OIR-08-2015-0249"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/oir-08-2015-0249","relation":{},"ISSN":["1468-4527"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1468-4527"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,8]]}}}