{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T17:28:42Z","timestamp":1754155722622,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,7]],"date-time":"2015-04-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1428364800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,7]]},"abstract":"\n Purpose<\/jats:title>\n \u2013 The purpose of this paper is to present the role and contribution of natural language processing techniques, in particular negation detection and word sense disambiguation in the process of Semantic Annotation of Archaeological Grey Literature. Archaeological reports contain a great deal of information that conveys facts and findings in different ways. This kind of information is highly relevant to the research and analysis of archaeological evidence but at the same time can be a hindrance for the accurate indexing of documents with respect to positive assertions. <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n \u2013 The paper presents a method for adapting the biomedicine oriented negation algorithm NegEx to the context of archaeology and discusses the evaluation results of the new modified negation detection module. A particular form of polysemy, which is inflicted by the definition of ontology classes and concerning the semantics of small finds in archaeology, is addressed by a domain specific word-sense disambiguation module. <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Findings<\/jats:title>\n \u2013 The performance of the negation dection module is compared against a \u201cGold Standard\u201d that consists of 300 manually annotated pages of archaeological excavation and evaluation reports. The evaluation results are encouraging, delivering overall 89 per cent precision, 80 per cent recall and 83 per cent F-measure scores. The paper addresses limitations and future improvements of the current work and highlights the need for ontological modelling to accommodate negative assertions. <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n \u2013 The discussed NLP modules contribute to the aims of the OPTIMA pipeline delivering an innovative application of such methods in the context of archaeological reports for the semantic annotation of archaeological grey literature with respect to the CIDOC-CRM ontology.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/prog-10-2014-0076","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,26]],"date-time":"2015-03-26T12:26:43Z","timestamp":1427372803000},"page":"118-134","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Negation detection and word sense disambiguation in digital archaeology reports for the purposes of semantic annotation"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Andreas","family":"Vlachidis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Douglas","family":"Tudhope","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bizer, C.\n , \n Heath, T.\n and \n Berners-Lee, T.\n (2009), \u201cLinked data \u2013 the story so far\u201d, \n International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems\n , Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 1-22.","DOI":"10.4018\/jswis.2009081901"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b2","unstructured":"Blanco, E.\n and \n Moldovan, D.\n (2011), \u201cSemantic representation of negation using focus detection\u201d, 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland."},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chapman, W.W.\n , \n Bridewell, W.\n , \n Hanbury, P.\n , \n Cooper, G.F.\n and \n Buchanan, B.G.\n (2001), \u201cA simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries\u201d, \n Journal of Biomedical Informatics\n , Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 301-310.","DOI":"10.1006\/jbin.2001.1029"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b4","unstructured":"Crofts, N.\n , \n Doerr, M.\n , \n Gill, T.\n , \n Stead, S.\n and \n Stiff, M.\n (2009), \u201cDefinition of the CIDOC Conceptual reference model\u201d, available at: http:\/\/cidoc.ics.forth.gr\/docs\/cidoc_crm_version_5.0.1_Mar09.pdf (accessed 11 March 2015)."},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Doerr, M.\n , \n Kritsotaki,A.\n and \n Boutsika, K.\n (2011), \u201cFactual argumentation-a core model for assertions making\u201d, \n Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage\n , Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 1-34.","DOI":"10.1145\/1921614.1921615"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Falkingham, G.\n (2005), \u201cA whiter shade of grey: a new approach to archaeological grey literature using the XML version of the TEI guidelines\u201d, \n Internet Archaeology\n , Vol. 17, available at: http:\/\/intarch.ac.uk\/journal\/issue17\/falkingham_index.html","DOI":"10.11141\/ia.17.5"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b8","unstructured":"Goryachev, S.\n , \n Sordo, M.\n , \n Zeng, Q.T.\n and \n Ngo, L.\n (2006), \u201cImplementation and evaluation of four different methods of negation detection\u201d, Technical report, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA."},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grishman, R.\n and \n Sundheim, B.\n (1996), \u201cMessage understanding conference-6: a brief history\u201d, 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen.","DOI":"10.3115\/992628.992709"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b7","unstructured":"Horn, L.R.\n (1989), \n A Natural History of Negation\n , University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL."},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maynard, D.\n and \n Funk, A.\n (2011), \u201cAutomatic detection of political opinions in tweets\u201d, Making Sense of Microposts Workshop at ESWC 2011, Heraklion.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-25953-1_8"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b10","unstructured":"Maynard, D.\n , \n Peters, W.\n and \n Li, Y.\n (2006), \u201cMetrics for evaluation of ontology-based information extraction\u201d, Proceedings WWW Conference 2006, Workshop on Evaluation of Ontologies for the Web, Edinburgh."},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Miller, G.A.\n (1995), \u201cWordnet: a lexical database for english\u201d, \n Communications of the ACM\n , Vol. 38 No. 11, pp. 39-41.","DOI":"10.1145\/219717.219748"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nadeau, D.\n and \n Sekine, S.\n (2007), \u201cA survey of named entity recognition and classification\u201d, \n Lingvisticae Investigationes\n , Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 3-26","DOI":"10.1075\/li.30.1.03nad"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Navigli R.\n (2009), \u201cWord sense disambiguation: a survey\u201d, \n ACM Computing Surveys\n , Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 10-11.","DOI":"10.1145\/1459352.1459355"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Hara, K.\n , \n Berners-Lee, T.\n , \n Hall, W.\n and \n Shadbolt, N.\n (2010), \n Use of the Semantic Web in e-Research\n , The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262014397.003.0016"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b16","unstructured":"Resnik P.\n (1997), \u201cSelectional preferences and sense disambiguation\u201d, Proceedings ACL SIGLEX Workshop on Tagging Text with Lexical Semantics, Columbia, Washington, DC, 4-5 April."},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b17","unstructured":"Ruch, P.\n , \n Baud, R.\n , \n Geissbuhler, A.\n and \n Rassinoux, A.M.\n (2001), \u201cComparing general and medical texts for information retrieval based on natural language processing: an inquiry into lexical disambiguation\u201d, \n Med-info\n , Vol. 10, pp. 261-265."},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tudhope, D.\n , \n May, K.\n , \n Binding, C.\n and \n Vlachidis, A.\n (2011), \u201cConnecting archaeological data and grey literature via semantic cross search\u201d, \n Internet Archaeology\n , Vol. 30, available at: http:\/\/intarch.ac.uk\/journal\/issue30\/tudhope_index.html","DOI":"10.11141\/ia.30.5"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Uren, V.\n , \n Cimiano, P.\n , \n Iria, J.\n , \n Handschuh, S.\n , \n Vargas-Vera, M.\n , \n Motta, E.\n and \n Ciravegna, F.\n (2006), \u201cSemantic annotation for knowledge management: requirements and a survey of the state of the art\u201d, \n Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the WWW\n , Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 14-28.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.websem.2005.10.002"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b21","unstructured":"Vlachidis, A.\n (2012), \u201cSemantic indexing via knowledge organisation resources: applying the CIDOC-CRM to archaeological\u201d, PhD Thesis, University of Glamorgan, Glamorgan."},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vlachidis, A.\n and \n Tudhope, D.\n (2012), \u201cA pilot investigation of information extraction in the semantic annotation of archaeological reports\u201d, \n International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies\n , Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 222-235.","DOI":"10.1504\/IJMSO.2012.050183"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Voorhees E.\n (1993), \u201cUsing wordnet to disambiguate word senses for text retrieval\u201d, Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Pittsburgh, 27 June-1 July, pp. 171-180.","DOI":"10.1145\/160688.160715"},{"key":"key2020122504035253700_b23","unstructured":"Westbury, C.\n (2000), \u201cJust say no: The evolutionary and developmental significance of negation in behavior and natural language\u201d, 3rd Conference The Evolution of Language, Paris."}],"container-title":["Program"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/PROG-10-2014-0076\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/PROG-10-2014-0076\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T21:57:37Z","timestamp":1753394257000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/dta\/article\/49\/2\/118-134\/332197"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,7]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/PROG-10-2014-0076"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/prog-10-2014-0076","relation":{},"ISSN":["0033-0337"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0033-0337"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,7]]}}}