{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,23]],"date-time":"2026-06-23T17:55:11Z","timestamp":1782237311163,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]],"date-time":"2021-10-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1634256000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["SAMPJ"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,17]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The concept of materiality is becoming increasingly important for sustainability performance measurement and reporting. It is widely agreed upon that materiality matters, in the sense that companies should identify, prioritize and disclose information on sustainability issues that are considered material. There is, however, a tension at the heart of this consensus, owing to parallel approaches to materiality being used in practice. This paper aims to shed light on how and why the parallel uses of the materiality concept may cause confusion and how this tension could be resolved.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This paper takes as point of departure the tension between two approaches to materiality: based on the Global Reporting Initiative definition, which emphasizes sustainability issues that are important to stakeholders and that have significant impacts and based on the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board definition, which emphasizes sustainability issues that are financially material, i.e. likely to influence the financial performance of the company. This paper discusses the nature and consequences of the tensions between how the two definitions of materiality in sustainability reporting are used in practice, with a particular emphasis on users of information in financial markets. This paper provides empirical insight on these users\u2019 perspectives through a survey (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 30) and qualitative interviews (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 6) of financial market professionals.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This study reveals tensions between different approaches to materiality in practice and how this may lead users of sustainability reports to draw unjustified conclusions on the basis of materiality assessments. Specifically, this paper demonstrates the perceived shortcomings in information availability and information quality from the perspectives of different stakeholders in financial markets with different information needs.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The users of sustainability reporting information require clarity in the communication of materiality in non-financial reports. This paper addresses how such clarity can be pursued.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Social implications<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Clarity about materiality in non-financial reporting is important both for investors that pursue financial return on green investments and for society at large, which relies on information about real sustainability impacts.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This paper furthers the understanding of how different materiality concepts may be problematic and how recent and ongoing developments may mitigate the risks of conflating uses of the concept.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/sampj-01-2021-0009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,14]],"date-time":"2021-10-14T16:04:16Z","timestamp":1634227456000},"page":"341-361","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":138,"title":["Sustainability reporting and approaches to materiality: tensions and potential resolutions"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Sveinung","family":"J\u00f8rgensen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aksel","family":"Mj\u00f8s","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lars Jacob Tynes","family":"Pedersen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"140","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref001","unstructured":"Adams, C.A. Druckman, P.B. and Picot, R.C. (2020), \u201cSustainable development goal disclosure (SDGD) recommendations, published by ACCA, chartered accountants ANZ, ICAS, IFAC, IIRC and WBA\u201d, available at: www.ifac.org\/knowledge-gateway\/contributing-global-economy\/publications\/sustainable-development-goals-disclosure-sdgd-recommendations (accessed 16 December 2020)."},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1108\/SAMPJ-12-2018-0343","article-title":"Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports","volume":"11","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref003","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-71062-4_43-1","article-title":"Materiality: from accounting to sustainability and the SDGs","volume-title":"Responsible Consumption and Production. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals","year":"2019"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref004","article-title":"Statement of intent to work together towards comprehensive corporate reporting: summary of alignment discussions among leading sustainability and integrated reporting organisations CDP, CDSB, GRI, IIRC and SASB","author":"CDP, CDSB, GRI, IIRC and SASB","year":"2020"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1016\/j.accfor.2013.04.006","article-title":"Sustainability reporting: the role of \u2018search\u2019, \u2018experience\u2019 and \u2018credence\u2019 information","volume":"37","year":"2013","journal-title":"Accounting Forum"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-6622.2012.00380.x","article-title":"The need for sector-specific materiality and sustainability reporting standards","volume":"24","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Corporate Finance"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpa.2013.06.001","article-title":"A genealogy of accounting materiality","volume":"25","year":"2014","journal-title":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bar.2014.11.001","article-title":"The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: a field study approach","volume":"47","year":"2015","journal-title":"The British Accounting Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref009","first-page":"35","article-title":"Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously","volume":"48","year":"2014","journal-title":"Long Range Planning"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref010","unstructured":"EU (2019), \u201cGuidelines on reporting climate-related information\u201d, EU, Brussels, Belgium, available at: https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/finance\/docs\/policy\/190618-climate-related-information-reporting-guidelines_en.pdf"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref011","unstructured":"EU (2021), \u201cQuestions and answers: corporate sustainability reporting directive proposal\u201d, EU, Brussels, Belgium, available at: https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/commission\/presscorner\/detail\/en\/QANDA_21_1806"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref012","unstructured":"European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (2021), \u201cProposals for a relevant and dynamic EU sustainability reporting standard-setting\u201d, European FinFancial Reporting Advisory Group, Brussels, available at: www.efrag.org\/Assets\/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FEFRAG%2520PTF-NFRS_MAIN_REPORT.pdf (accessed 30 July 2021)."},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref013","unstructured":"EY (2018), \u201cHow materiality can help reporting meet the demands of investors\u201d, EY Asia, available at: www.ey.com\/en_gl\/assurance\/how-materiality-can-help-reporting-meet-the-demands-of-investors"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref014","volume-title":"The Materiality Report: aligning Strategy, Performance and Reporting","year":"2006"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref015","unstructured":"Gibassier, D. (2019), \u201cMateriality assessment: contribution to single or double materiality debate\u201d, Working paper, Audencia Business School, Nantes, France, available at: www.anc.gouv.fr\/files\/live\/sites\/anc\/files\/contributed\/ANC\/3.%20Recherche\/D_Etats%20generaux\/2020\/Policy%20papers\/TR4_VE-paper-Delphine-Gibassier.pdf"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref016","unstructured":"Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2011), Technical Protocol: Applying the Report Content Principles, GRI, Amsterdam."},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref017","unstructured":"Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2016), GRI 101: Foundation 2016, GRI, Amsterdam."},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref018","volume-title":"A Practical Guide to Sustainability Reporting Using GRI and SASB Standards","author":"Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board","year":"2021"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1561\/1400000061","article-title":"Research on corporate sustainability: review and directions for future research","volume":"14","year":"2020","journal-title":"Foundations and Trends\u00ae in Accounting"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref020","first-page":"1","article-title":"Material sustainability information and stock price informativeness","volume":"171","year":"2020","journal-title":"Journal of Business Ethics"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grewal, J. Serafeim, G. and Yoon, A. (2016), \u201cShareholder activism on sustainability issues\u201d, Working paper, available at: https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2805512","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2805512"},{"issue":"5","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0232076","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0232076","article-title":"A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research","volume":"15","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref023","unstructured":"Guillot, J. and Hales, J. (2021), \u201cMateriality: the word that launched a thousand debates\u201d, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, available at: https:\/\/corpgov.law.harvard.edu\/2021\/05\/14\/materiality-the-word-that-launched-a-thousand-debates\/ (accessed 17 July 2021)."},{"issue":"3","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1007\/s10551-015-2678-1","article-title":"Classification of trade-offs encountered in the practice of corporate sustainability","volume":"140","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Business Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s10551-014-2047-5","article-title":"Tensions in corporate sustainability: towards an integrative framework","volume":"127","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Business Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1111\/ablj.12148","article-title":"The convergence of financial and ESG materiality: taking sustainability mainstream","volume":"56","year":"2019","journal-title":"American Business Law Journal"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref027","volume-title":"RESTART Sustainable Business Model Innovation","year":"2018"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref028","unstructured":"Katz, D.A. and McIntosh, L.A. (2021), \u201cMateriality in America and Abroad\u201d, New York Law Journal, April 28th, available at: www.law.com\/newyorklawjournal\/2021\/04\/28\/materiality-in-america-and-abroad\/ (accessed 17 July 2021)."},{"issue":"6","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1697","DOI":"10.2308\/accr-51383","article-title":"Corporate sustainability: first evidence on materiality","volume":"91","year":"2016","journal-title":"The Accounting Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref030","first-page":"1","article-title":"Corporate sustainability at a crossroads","volume":"58","year":"2017","journal-title":"MIT Sloan Management Review"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref031","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","article-title":"Dynamic materiality: measuring what matters","year":"2020","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3521035"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.2308\/aud.2005.24.2.153","article-title":"A review and integration of empirical research on materiality: two decades later","volume":"24","year":"2005","journal-title":"Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1111\/1911-3846.12162","article-title":"Differences in auditors' materiality assessments when auditing financial statements and sustainability reports","volume":"33","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contemporary Accounting Research"},{"issue":"9","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref034","first-page":"56","article-title":"Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation","volume":"87","year":"2009","journal-title":"Harvard Business Review"},{"issue":"8","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1002\/bse.1841","article-title":"Exploring the relationship between sustainability reporting and sustainability management practices","volume":"24","year":"2015","journal-title":"Business Strategy and the Environment"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"562","DOI":"10.2307\/258559","article-title":"Using paradox to build management and organization theories","volume":"14","year":"1989","journal-title":"Academy of Management Review"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref037","volume-title":"Implementing Integrated Reporting: PwC\u2019s Practical Guide for a New Business Language","author":"PwC","year":"2019"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1177\/1086026619875436","article-title":"In the eyes of the beholder: experimental evidence on the contested nature of materiality in sustainability reporting","volume":"33","year":"2020","journal-title":"Organization and Environment"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rogers, J. and Serafeim, G. (2019), \u201cPathways to materiality: how sustainability issues become financially material to corporations and their investors\u201d, Harvard Business School Accounting and Management Unit Working Paper, pp. 20-56.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3482546"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref040","unstructured":"Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (2017), \u201cSASB conceptual framework\u201d, Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, San Francisco, CA, available at: www.sasb.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/SASB-Conceptual-Framework.pdf?source=post_page (accessed 30 July 2021)."},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref041","volume-title":"Materiality Matters: Targeting the ESG Issues That Can Impact Performance \u2013 the Material ESG Score","year":"2018"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121662","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2020.121662","article-title":"Assessing tensions in corporate sustainability transition: from a review of the literature towards an actor-oriented management approach","volume":"264","year":"2020","journal-title":"Journal of Cleaner Production"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2022032509220992800_ref043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1002\/bse.1928","article-title":"Prioritizing sustainability indicators: using materiality analysis to guide sustainability assessment and strategy","volume":"26","year":"2017","journal-title":"Business Strategy and the Environment"},{"key":"key2022032509220992800_ref044","volume-title":"Redefining Materiality: Practice and Public Policy for Effective Corporate Reporting","year":"2003"}],"container-title":["Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/SAMPJ-01-2021-0009\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/SAMPJ-01-2021-0009\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T22:33:00Z","timestamp":1753396380000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/sampj\/article\/13\/2\/341-361\/339058"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,17]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/SAMPJ-01-2021-0009"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/sampj-01-2021-0009","relation":{},"ISSN":["2040-8021","2040-8021"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2040-8021","type":"print"},{"value":"2040-8021","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]]}}}