{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,5]],"date-time":"2025-10-05T22:23:45Z","timestamp":1759703025689,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,23]],"date-time":"2007-10-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1193097600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,23]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The main aim of this paper is to focus on a big step for IPv6: deployment. At the same time, it aims to issue a warning about something that should be in a more evolved stage.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>A multiple\u2010angle analysis about IPv6 deployment was used: breaking some myths, looking at deployment data and trying to relate to IPv4's deployment.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>The paper finds that IPv6 deployment is not yet on track. Comparison between IPv6 and IPv4 network performance is negative.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Research limitations\/implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>Numbers and policy analysis described in this paper will naturally evolve and thus will need to be revisited in future work. This theme will be progressively more important as IPv4 address space becomes exhausted.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Practical implications<\/jats:title><jats:p>More IPv6 deployment is needed, in order to ensure Internet's continued growth. In order to become a viable solution for the global Internet, IPv6 deployment must be seen as a priority for network administrators today.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type=\"abstract-heading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper's content may alert some players to the needed effort associated with the Internet's evolution. Other audiences will benefit from the data and details discussed, in order to gain confidence about deploying IPv6.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/10662240710830208","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,20]],"date-time":"2007-10-20T05:27:50Z","timestamp":1192858070000},"page":"505-518","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Is global IPv6 deployment on track?"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"M\u00f3nica","family":"Domingues","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Carlos","family":"Fria\u00e7as","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Pedro","family":"Veiga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b1","unstructured":"ARIN (2007), Internet Number Resources Policies, ARIN, Chantilly, VA, available at: www.arin.net\/policy\/."},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b5","unstructured":"CAIDA (2005), Visualizing IPv6 AS\u2010level Internet Topology, CAIDA, La Jolla, CA, available at: www.caida.org\/analysis\/topology\/as_core_network\/ipv6.xml."},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b7","unstructured":"DARPA (1981), DARPA Internet Protocol, RFC 791, DARPA, Arlington, VA, September 1981, available at: www.ietf.org\/rfc\/rfc0791.txt."},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Daigle, E. (2002), IAB Considerations for UNilateral Self\u2010Address Fixing (UNSAF) Across Network Address Translation, RFC 3424, November 2002, available at: www.ietf.org\/rfc\/rfc3424.txt.","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc3424"},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b10","unstructured":"Domingues, M., Fria\u00e7as, C. and Baptista, M. (2005), The New Public Internet & Profits for ISPs within IPv6 Deployment, available at: www.fccn.pt\/files\/documents\/D5.13.PDF."},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Egevang, K. and Francis, P. (1994), Network Address Translator, RFC 1631, May 1994, available at: www.ietf.org\/rfc\/rfc1631.txt.","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc1631"},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fink, R. and Hinden, R. (2004), 6bone (IPv6 Testing Address Allocation) Phaseout, RFC 3701, March 2004, available at: www.ietf.org\/rfc\/rfc3701.txt.","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc3701"},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hain, T. (2000), Architectural Implications of NAT, RFC 2993, Vol. 2000, November 2000, available at: www.ietf.org\/rfc\/rfc2993.txt.","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc2993"},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b14","unstructured":"Hain, T. (2005), A Pragmatic Report on Ipv4 Address Space Consumption, available at: www.cisco.com\/web\/about\/ac123\/ac147\/archived_issues\/ipj_8\u20103\/ipv4.html."},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b2","unstructured":"RIPE (2006), IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy, ripe\u2010388, RIPE, Amsterdam, available at: www.ripe.net\/docs\/ipv6policy.html."},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_b16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rekhter, Y. and Li, T. (1995), A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP\u20104), RFC 1771, March 1995, available at: www.ietf.org\/rfc\/rfc1771.txt.","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc1771"},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_frg1","unstructured":"ARIN (2007), ARIN Board Advises Internet Community on Migration to IPv6, available at: www.arin.net\/announcements\/20070521.html."},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_frg2","unstructured":"ARIN (2007), American Registry for Internet Numbers, LTD. Service Agreement, version 9.1, ARIN, Chantilly, VA, January 2007, available at: www.arin.net\/registration\/agreements\/rsa.pdf."},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_frg3","unstructured":"CAIDA (2005), AS Internet Graph, CAIDA, La Jolla, CA, available at: www.caida.org\/analysis\/topology\/as_core_network\/AS_Network.x."},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_frg4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deering, S. and Hinden, R. (1998), Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification, RFC 2460, December 1998, available at: www.ietf.org\/rfc\/rfc2460.txt.","DOI":"10.17487\/rfc2460"},{"key":"key2022021020361668700_frg5","unstructured":"Pawlik, A. (2007), IPv4 Address Exhaustion, February 2007, available at: www.ripe.net\/meetings\/roundtable\/feb2007\/presentations\/ipv4.pdf."}],"container-title":["Internet Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emeraldinsight.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1108\/10662240710830208","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/10662240710830208\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/10662240710830208\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:40:15Z","timestamp":1753400415000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/intr\/article\/17\/5\/505-518\/178768"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Thomas C.","family":"Schmidt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,23]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,23]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/10662240710830208"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/10662240710830208","relation":{},"ISSN":["1066-2243"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1066-2243"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,23]]}}}