{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]],"date-time":"2026-01-23T07:47:47Z","timestamp":1769154467199,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":57,"publisher":"Emerald","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,20]],"date-time":"2017-03-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1489968000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/site-policies"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["TG"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,20]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Purpose<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This paper aims to analyse extant literature on open data, distinguish and categorize the strands of public accountability research and use the results to provide better clarity in the concept of open data-driven public accountability.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Systematic review of 135 open data articles and 155 accountability articles from the e-government reference library. A multi-stage analysis results in 12 articles which are categorized using Bovens\u2019 (2007) accountability theory of information, discussion and consequences. Conceptual development, using the literature analysis, forms the final section of the paper.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Findings<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Research demonstrates that a range of open data topics has been advanced. However, just 12 articles exist that simultaneously address open data and accountability theory. Of the total 155 public accountability articles, the preponderant focus is on the information (<jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> = 25) and discussion (<jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> = 7) stages of the accountability process. Just one article focuses on the complete accountability process. To address this problem, the characterization of open (government) data-driven public accountability establishes conceptual crispness and clarity.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title content-type=\"abstract-subheading\">Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Public accountability theory on open government has become overshadowed by social and economic value perspectives. This paper clarifies and advances  the open data-driven public accountability perspective. It takes stock of public accountability research, delimits the key issues and questions and highlights the next steps needed for developing scholarship.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1108\/tg-12-2015-0050","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,26]],"date-time":"2017-04-26T04:47:33Z","timestamp":1493182053000},"page":"42-57","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Open data driven public accountability"],"prefix":"10.1108","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Rui Pedro","family":"Louren\u00e7o","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Suzanne","family":"Piotrowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Alex","family":"Ingrams","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"140","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2202\/1944-2866.1076","article-title":"The trouble with transparency: a critical review of openness in e-government","volume":"3","year":"2011","journal-title":"Policy & Internet"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2013.06.002","article-title":"ICT, public values and transformative government: a framework and programme for research","volume":"31","year":"2014","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref003","unstructured":"Berners-Lee, T. (2010), \u201cFive star open data scheme\u201d, available at: http:\/\/5stardata.info\/en\/"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2010.03.001","article-title":"Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies","volume":"27","year":"2010","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1108\/17506161211214831","article-title":"Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government","volume":"6","year":"2012","journal-title":"Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x","article-title":"Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework","volume":"13","year":"2007","journal-title":"European Law Journal"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref007","article-title":"Business intelligence systems as management, accountability and transparency tools for the government: the case of platform Aquarius","year":"2014"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cho, Y.H. and Choi, B.-D. (2004), \u201cE-government to combat corruption: the case of seoul metropolitan government\u201d, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 27 No. 10, pp. 719-735, available at: http:\/\/proquest.umi.com\/pqdweb?did=850335141&Fmt=7&clientId=8991&RQT=309&VName=PQD","DOI":"10.1081\/PAD-200029114"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref009","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2012.07.003","article-title":"Social media in government","volume":"29","year":"2012","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref010","article-title":"In the service of democracy a consultation paper on a policy for electronic democracy","volume-title":"HM Government and UKOnline","year":"2002"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref011","unstructured":"Davies, T. (2013), \u201cOpen data barometer: 2013 global report\u201d, available at: www.opendataresearch.org\/dl\/odb2013\/Open-Data-Barometer-2013-Global-Report.pdf"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref012","first-page":"50","article-title":"Information strategies for open government: challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency","year":"2010"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref013","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","article-title":"Using parliamentary Brazilian open data to improve transparency and public participation in Brazil","year":"2014","DOI":"10.1145\/2612733.2612769"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref014","first-page":"143","article-title":"Accountable agents: federal performance measurement and third-party government","volume":"20","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref015","unstructured":"Francoli, M. and Clarke, A. (2014), \u201cWhat\u2019s in a name? A comparison of \u2018open government\u2019 definitions across seven open government partnership members\u201d, JeDEM \u2013 eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 248-266, available at: www.jedem.org\/article\/view\/227"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","article-title":"Government 2.0: a conceptual framework and a case study using Mexican data for assessing the evolution towards open governments","year":"2014","DOI":"10.1145\/2612733.2612742"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.3233\/IP-2011-0222","article-title":"Being transparent or spinning the message? An experiment into the effects of varying message content on trust in government","volume":"16","year":"2011","journal-title":"Information Polity"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref018","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.3233\/ip-2012-000288","article-title":"A good man but a bad wizard: about the limits and future of transparency of democratic governments","volume":"17","year":"2012","journal-title":"Information Polity"},{"issue":"4","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref019","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1111\/puar.12047","article-title":"The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment","volume":"73","year":"2013","journal-title":"Public Administration Review"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hartog, M., Mulder, B., Sp\u00e9e, B., Visser, E. and Gribnau, A. (2014a), \u201cOpen data within governmental organisations: effects, benefits and challenges of the implementation process\u201d, JeDEM \u2013 eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 49-61, available at: www.jedem.org\/article\/view\/291","DOI":"10.29379\/jedem.v6i1.291"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref021","article-title":"The structural adoption of open data in governmental organisations: technology and organisation in practice","year":"2014"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref022","first-page":"25","article-title":"Varieties of transparency","volume-title":"Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Proceedings of the British Academy","year":"2006"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1504\/IJWET.2011.040725","article-title":"A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralized data","volume":"6","year":"2011","journal-title":"International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref024","first-page":"235","article-title":"Open government data: a stage model","year":"2011"},{"issue":"2\/3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref025","first-page":"110","article-title":"The sidetracked 2008 YouTube senate campaign","volume":"7","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref026","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2009.12.009","article-title":"Ten year retrospect on stage models of e-government: a qualitative meta-synthesis","volume":"27","year":"2010","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref027","first-page":"262","article-title":"What is open government? One year after the directive","year":"2011"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref028","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.3233\/IP-130310","article-title":"Data disclosure and transparency for accountability: a strategy and case analysis","volume":"18","year":"2013","journal-title":"Information Polity"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref029","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40358-3_6","article-title":"Open government portals assessment: a transparency for accountability perspective","volume-title":"Electronic Government","year":"2013"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref030","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2015.05.006","article-title":"An analysis of open government portals: a perspective of transparency for accountability","volume":"32","year":"2015","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref032","first-page":"105","article-title":"Public accountability ICT support: a detailed account of public accountability process and tasks","year":"2015"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref031","first-page":"280","article-title":"Open government and online transparency for accountability: one assessing model and two applications","volume":"11","year":"2013","journal-title":"European Journal of Electronic Government"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref033","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1787\/9789264019492-3-en","article-title":"Using information and communication technologies to enhance citizen engagement in the policy process","volume-title":"Promise and Problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement","year":"2003"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref036","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1111\/puar.12032","article-title":"Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency","volume":"73","year":"2013","journal-title":"Public Administration Review"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref037","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1080\/01900692.2014.934837","article-title":"Government transparency in historical perspective: from the ancient regime to open data in the Netherlands","volume":"38","year":"2015","journal-title":"International Journal of Public Administration"},{"issue":"1\/2","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref034","first-page":"67","article-title":"Transparent government: parliamentary and legal accountability in an information age","volume":"8","year":"2003","journal-title":"Information Polity"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref035","first-page":"213","article-title":"Digitization and political accountability in the USA and the Netherlands: convergence or reproduction of differences?","volume":"5","year":"2007","journal-title":"Electronic Journal of E-Government"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref038","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1111\/puar.12021","article-title":"A three-stage adoption process for social media use in government","volume":"73","year":"2013","journal-title":"Public Administration Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref039","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.4018\/ijegr.2014010102","article-title":"Is open data enough?: E-governance challenges for open government","volume":"10","year":"2014","journal-title":"International Journal of Electronic Government Research"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref040","unstructured":"Munson, S.A., Avrahami, D., Consolvo, S., Fogarty, J., Friedman, B. and Smith, I. (2011), \u201cAttitudes toward online availability of US public records\u201d, 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2011), ACM, College Park, MD, pp. 2-9, available at: http:\/\/doi.acm.org\/10.1145\/2037556.2037558"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref041","article-title":"Data ships: an empirical examination of open (closed) government data","year":"2015"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref042","first-page":"74","article-title":"Institutionalisation, framing, and diffusion: the logic of openness in egovernment and implementation decisions (a lesson for developing countries)","year":"2010"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref043","unstructured":"Open Government Working Group (2007), \u201cEight principles of open government data\u201d, available at: www.opengovdata.org\/home\/8principles"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref044","unstructured":"Peixoto, T. (2013), \u201cThe uncertain relationship between open data and accountability: a response to Yu and Robinson\u2019s the new ambiguity of \u2018open government\u2019\u201d, UCLA Law Review Disclosure, 60, pp. 200-213, available at: http:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2264369"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1177\/0020852311429428","article-title":"WikiLeaks: the illusion of transparency","volume":"78","year":"2012","journal-title":"International Review of Administrative Sciences"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref046","first-page":"160","article-title":"Government data and the invisible hand","volume":"11","year":"2009","journal-title":"Yale Journal of Law & Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.2753\/PMR1530-9576360302","article-title":"Innovations in accountability","volume":"36","year":"2013","journal-title":"Public Performance & Management Review"},{"issue":"3","key":"key2020120900582123800_B23a","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1109\/mis.2012.23","article-title":"Linked open government data: lessons from Data.gov.uk","volume":"27","year":"2012","journal-title":"IEEE Intelligent Systems"},{"issue":"1","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref048","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2014.11.004","article-title":"Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: cases in the Greek context","volume":"32","year":"2015","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref049","first-page":"90","article-title":"A framework for assessing eparticipation projects and tools","year":"2007"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref050","unstructured":"Ubaldi, B. (2013), Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives, No. 22, OECD Publishing, available at: \/content\/workingpaper\/5k46bj4f03s7-en"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120900582123800_B35a","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1111\/gove.12073","article-title":"How civil society organizations close the gap between transparency and accountability","volume":"27","year":"2014","journal-title":"Governance"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref051","first-page":"207","article-title":"Open government data: more than eighty formats","year":"2012"},{"issue":"3\/4","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref052","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.3233\/IP-140338","article-title":"Compliance with open government data policies: an empirical assessment of Italian local public administrations","volume":"19","year":"2014","journal-title":"Information Polity"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref053","volume-title":"Assessing E-Government: The Internet, Democracy and Service Delivery by State and Federal Governments","year":"2000"},{"issue":"2","key":"key2020120900582123800_ref054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0491.2004.00246.x","article-title":"Does e-government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of website openness and government accountability","volume":"17","year":"2004","journal-title":"Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions"},{"key":"key2020120900582123800_ref055","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2012489","article-title":"The new ambiguity of \u2018open government\u2019","volume":"59","year":"2012","journal-title":"UCLA Law Review Disclosure"}],"container-title":["Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/TG-12-2015-0050\/full\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.emerald.com\/insight\/content\/doi\/10.1108\/TG-12-2015-0050\/full\/html","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T21:35:53Z","timestamp":1753392953000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.emerald.com\/tg\/article\/11\/1\/42-57\/374546"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,20]]},"references-count":57,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,20]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1108\/TG-12-2015-0050"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/tg-12-2015-0050","relation":{},"ISSN":["1750-6166"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1750-6166","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,20]]}}}