{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T05:15:11Z","timestamp":1788326111084,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,15]],"date-time":"2018-06-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1529020800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100004330","name":"GlaxoSmithKline","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100004330","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Dermatology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Adapalene 0.1% (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ADA<\/jats:styled-content>) with clindamycin phosphate 1.2% (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>;<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"> ADA<\/jats:styled-content> + <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>) and the fixed\u2010dose combination containing <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content> and benzoyl peroxide 3% (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>\/<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPO<\/jats:styled-content> 3%) are strongly recommended for the early treatment of acne vulgaris in Japan. Here, we compare the early efficacy and safety of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>\/<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPO<\/jats:styled-content> 3% with Japanese standard topical use of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ADA<\/jats:styled-content> + <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content> in the treatment of acne vulgaris. In this phase <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IV<\/jats:styled-content>, multicenter study, 351 patients were randomized to receive <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>\/<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPO<\/jats:styled-content> 3% or <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ADA<\/jats:styled-content> + <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content> for 12 weeks. The primary end\u2010point was percentage change from baseline in total lesion (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TL<\/jats:styled-content>) counts at week 2. Secondary end\u2010points included the percentage change from baseline in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TL<\/jats:styled-content>, inflammatory and non\u2010inflammatory lesion (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IL<\/jats:styled-content> and non\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IL<\/jats:styled-content>) counts, Investigator's Static Global Assessment (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ISGA<\/jats:styled-content>), quality of life (QoL [Skindex\u201016]) and patient preference. Local tolerability scores and adverse events were also recorded. <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>\/<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPO<\/jats:styled-content> 3% provided a significantly greater percentage reduction from baseline in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TL<\/jats:styled-content> compared with <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ADA<\/jats:styled-content> + <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content> at week 2, and week 4. Compared with <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ADA<\/jats:styled-content> + <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>,<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"> CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>\/<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPO<\/jats:styled-content> 3% was superior at reducing <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IL<\/jats:styled-content> (but not non\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IL<\/jats:styled-content>) over weeks 2\u201312, was more effective at improving patient QoL and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ISGA<\/jats:styled-content>, and scored higher in patient\u2010preference assessments. Both treatments were well tolerated; adverse drug reactions occurred more frequently in patients receiving <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ADA<\/jats:styled-content> + <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content> (37%) than in those receiving <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>\/<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPO<\/jats:styled-content> 3% (17%). In conclusion, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>\/<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPO<\/jats:styled-content> 3% showed greater efficacy for the early treatment of acne vulgaris in Japan, with a more favorable safety profile compared with <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ADA<\/jats:styled-content> + <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLNP<\/jats:styled-content>.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/1346-8138.14497","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,15]],"date-time":"2018-06-15T10:08:31Z","timestamp":1529057311000},"page":"951-962","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Clindamycin phosphate 1.2%\/benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed\u2010dose combination gel versus topical combination therapy of adapalene 0.1% gel and clindamycin phosphate 1.2% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japanese patients: A multicenter, randomized, investigator\u2010blind, parallel\u2010group study"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Nobukazu","family":"Hayashi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology Toranomon Hospital Tokyo Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1440-5178","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ichiro","family":"Kurokawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology Acne Clinical Research Center Meiwa Hospital Nishinomiya Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Obukohwo","family":"Siakpere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medical Affairs, R&amp;D Chief Medical Office Stiefel Medical GSK London UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Akira","family":"Endo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Biomedical Data Sciences Department Japan Development and Medical Affairs GlaxoSmithKline KK Tokyo Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Toshiki","family":"Hatanaka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medical Affairs Japan Development and Medical Affairs GlaxoSmithKline KK Tokyo Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7370-2463","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Masahiro","family":"Yamada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medical Affairs Japan Development and Medical Affairs GlaxoSmithKline KK Tokyo Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Makoto","family":"Kawashima","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/bjd.13462"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jdv.13182"},{"issue":"10","key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","first-page":"1893","article-title":"Guideline for the treatment of acne vulgaris. (in Japanese)","volume":"118","author":"Hayashi N","year":"2008","journal-title":"Jpn J Dermatol"},{"issue":"126","key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","first-page":"1045","article-title":"Guideline for the treatment of acne vulgaris (in Japanese)","volume":"2016","author":"Hayashi N","year":"2016","journal-title":"Jpn J Dermatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/bjd.13265"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","unstructured":"FDA FADA.FDA Guidance for Industry: Acne Vulgaris \u2013 Developing Drugs for Treatment(Draft)2005."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","first-page":"1382","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%\u2010benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed\u2010dose combination gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double\u2010blind, active\u2010 and vehicle\u2010controlled study","volume":"10","author":"Eichenfield LF","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Drugs Dermatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/120347540100500202"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1346-8138.2002.tb00205.x"},{"issue":"9","key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","first-page":"1033","article-title":"The efficacy, safety and tolerability of adapalene versus benzoyl peroxide in the treatment of mild acne vulgaris; a randomized trial","volume":"12","author":"Babaeinejad SH","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Drugs Dermatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2133.2009.09209.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000029936"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jdv.13541"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2165\/00128071-200809050-00005"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","first-page":"16","article-title":"New therapy update \u2013 a unique combination formulation in the treatment of inflammatory acne","volume":"72","author":"Faqundes DS","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cutis"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","first-page":"16","article-title":"The tolerability profile of clindamycin 1%\/benzoyl peroxide 5% gel vs. adapalene 0.1%\/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel for facial acne: results of two randomized, single\u2010blind, split\u2010face studies","volume":"5","author":"Green L","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Clin Aesthet Dermatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1346-8138.12520"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1346-8138.12979"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","first-page":"281","article-title":"The effect of vehicle formulation on acne medication tolerability","volume":"82","author":"Draelos ZD","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cutis"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cpdd.7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000332847"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0149-2918(02)80023-6"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","first-page":"131","article-title":"A randomized, investigator\u2010blinded trial to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of a benzoyl peroxide 5%\/ clindamycin phosphate 1% gel compared with a clindamycin phosphate 1.2%\/tretinoin 0.025% gel in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris","volume":"9","author":"Jackson JM","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Drugs Dermatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","first-page":"669","article-title":"An Open\u2010label, randomized, multi\u2010center, phase III study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of benzoyl peroxide gel in long\u2010term use in patients with acne vulgaris","volume":"30","author":"Kawashima M","year":"2014","journal-title":"Rinshoiyaku"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2133.1994.tb08519.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1346-8138.13741"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Dermatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2F1346-8138.14497","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1346-8138.14497","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,18]],"date-time":"2023-09-18T01:56:56Z","timestamp":1695002216000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1346-8138.14497"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,15]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1346-8138.14497"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1346-8138.14497","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0385-2407","1346-8138"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0385-2407","type":"print"},{"value":"1346-8138","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2018-03-05","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-05-07","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-06-15","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}