{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T00:14:54Z","timestamp":1791159294711,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,31]],"date-time":"2013-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1369958400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"name":"URCAM and ARH of Burgundy, FICQSV"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BJOG"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare prediction of perinatal deaths among preterm infants based on fetal weight standards versus a new subpopulation\u2010based birthweight standard.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design<\/jats:title><jats:p>Population\u2010based cohort study.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title><jats:p>France.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Population<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 9100 preterm singletons, born between 24 and 36\u00a0weeks of gestation in 2000\u201309, in Burgundy (France).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>We first classified all newborns as either small for gestational age (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content>) or not, based on alternative fetal weight or birthweight standards, including a new birthweight standard that excludes infants born to mothers with disease related to the weight of a fetus. Based on discrepancies between the different classifications, we then divided the newborns into four groups, and compared their risks of stillbirth and in\u2010hospital death, using a generalised linear model with relative risks (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RR<\/jats:styled-content>).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measures<\/jats:title><jats:p>Perinatal deaths, including, in separate analyses, stillbirths and in\u2010hospital deaths.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The preterm infants classified as <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> by our new subpopulation\u2010based birthweight standard but not by the conventional birthweight standard had a significantly higher risk of both stillbirth (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RR<\/jats:styled-content>\u00a0=\u00a02.6; 95% confidence interval [95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>]\u00a0=\u00a01.9\u20133.6) and in\u2010hospital death (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RR<\/jats:styled-content>\u00a0=\u00a02.8; 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\u00a0=\u00a01.8\u20134.5). In contrast, no risk increase was found for infants classified as <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> by the fetal standard only (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RR<\/jats:styled-content>\u00a0=\u00a01.1; 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\u00a0=\u00a00.7\u20131.7 for stillbirths, and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RR<\/jats:styled-content>\u00a0=\u00a00.5; 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\u00a0=\u00a00.3\u20131.3 for in\u2010hospital deaths).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Our subpopulation\u2010based birthweight standard identified a subgroup of preterm newborns who have significantly increased risks of perinatal death but are not classified as <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> by the conventional birthweight standard. In contrast, the subgroup classified as <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> by the fetal standards only, but not by our subpopulation\u2010based birthweight standard, had no increased risk of mortality, compared with non\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> infants.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12282","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,31]],"date-time":"2013-05-31T10:21:10Z","timestamp":1369995670000},"page":"1456-1465","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Comparison of the ability of alternative birthweight and fetal weight standards to identify preterm newborns at increased risk of perinatal death"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"120","author":[{"given":"C","family":"Ferdynus","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre d'Epid\u00e9miologie des Populations Universit\u00e9 de Bourgogne Dijon France"},{"name":"Unit\u00e9 de Soutien M\u00e9thodologique University Hospital Saint Denis de la R\u00e9union France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C","family":"Quantin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"CHRU Service de Biostatistique et d'Informatique M\u00e9dicale CHU de Dijon France"},{"name":"Inserm U866 Dijon Universit\u00e9 de Bourgogne Dijon France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Abrahamowicz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics McGill University Montreal QC Canada"},{"name":"Department of Biostatistics R\u00e9union University (France) and CHU de La Reunion Centre d'Etudes P\u00e9rinatales de l'Oc\u00e9an Indien Saint\u2010Pierre Cedex France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Burguet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Inserm CIE1 Dijon France"},{"name":"CHRU Dijon Centre d'Investigation Clinique\u2013Epid\u00e9miologie Clinique\/Essais Cliniques Dijon France"},{"name":"Universit\u00e9 de Bourgogne Dijon France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Sagot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre d'Epid\u00e9miologie des Populations Universit\u00e9 de Bourgogne Dijon France"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University Hospital Dijon France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J\u2010B","family":"Gouyon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre d'Epid\u00e9miologie des Populations Universit\u00e9 de Bourgogne Dijon France"},{"name":"Department of Paediatrics University Hospital Dijon France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.11.057"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00575.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90681-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2007.11.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2007-2564"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.111.6.1273"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2005.089698"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2006.109439"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","first-page":"583","article-title":"Evaluation regionale en perinatalite: mise en place d'un recueil continu d'indicateurs [Using discharge abstracts as a tool to assess a regional perinatal network]","volume":"49","author":"Cornet B","year":"2001","journal-title":"Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","first-page":"181842","article-title":"Using discharge abstracts to evaluate a regional perinatal network: assessment of the linkage procedure of anonymous data","volume":"2009","author":"Quantin C","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Telemed Appl"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","unstructured":"BlondelB SupernantK Du MazaubrunC BreartG Enqu\u00eate nationale p\u00e9rinatale.2003[www.sante.gouv.fr\/htm\/dossiers\/perinat03\/sommaire.htm]. Accessed 05 june 2012."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4019"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(87)92154-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2003.11.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00218.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03067.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwq411"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.111719"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.019"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(94)00365-K"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.033"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1751"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.07.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.966"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e3181fbb5f5"}],"container-title":["BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12282","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12282","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,4]],"date-time":"2023-10-04T04:27:40Z","timestamp":1696393660000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12282"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,31]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1471-0528.12282"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12282","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1470-0328","1471-0528"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1470-0328","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-0528","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,5,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2013-03-10","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-05-31","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}