{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T07:27:40Z","timestamp":1792740460573,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,6]],"date-time":"2015-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1425600000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005762","name":"National Taiwan University Hospital","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["NTUH.102\u2010S2063"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NTUH.102\u2010S2063"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005762","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BJOG"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To investigate the recurrence potential of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Retrospective observational study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Tertiary university hospital.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Population<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study included 115 women who had intrauterine adhesions completely separated during hysteroscopic surgery. The treated adhesions were classified into four groups according to their location and extent: Group 1, central type (i.e. intervening space between the adhesions and both lateral uterine sidewalls) at the middle area of uterine cavity; Group 2, central type at uterine cornua; Group 3, cervico\u2010isthmic; and Group 4, extensive if the adhesions were dense with occlusion of part of the uterine cavity other than cervico\u2010isthmic region.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Postoperative outpatient hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was scheduled 10\u201314\u00a0days after the initial hysteroscopic surgery and procedures were repeated every 10\u201314\u00a0days until no reformed adhesions were detected. Multivariate logistic regression models were built to examine initial adhesion characteristics and other factors associated with adhesion reformation and need for subsequent outpatient adhesiolysis. Categorical data were compared using Fisher's exact test.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Number of postoperative outpatient hysteroscopic adhesiolysis procedures.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The location and extent of adhesions according to the allocated group was the only parameter independently related to the number of postoperative outpatient adhesiolysis procedures (\n                      <jats:italic>P\u00a0<\/jats:italic>\n                      =\u00a00.0004). Women with Group 1 adhesions underwent a lower number of postoperative interventions compared with those with Group 2, 3 and 4 adhesions (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a00.0355,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a00.0004 and\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a00.0087, respectively).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There is an increased likelihood of intrauterine adhesion recurrence when successfully divided adhesions were originally located at the uterine cornua, the cervico\u2010isthmic region or involved a large portion of the uterine cavity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13353","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,6]],"date-time":"2015-03-06T01:58:50Z","timestamp":1425607130000},"page":"618-623","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":63,"title":["The influence of the location and extent of intrauterine adhesions on recurrence after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"123","author":[{"given":"J\u2010H","family":"Yang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology College of Medicine and the Hospital National Taiwan University Taipei Taiwan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C\u2010D","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology College of Medicine and the Hospital National Taiwan University Taipei Taiwan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S\u2010U","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology College of Medicine and the Hospital National Taiwan University Taipei Taiwan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Y\u2010S","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology College of Medicine and the Hospital National Taiwan University Taipei Taiwan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M\u2010J","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology College of Medicine and the Hospital National Taiwan University Taipei Taiwan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1950.tb06053.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.10.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00375-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","first-page":"42","article-title":"Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic lysis of intrauterine adhesions: a result of 65 cases at Ramathibodi Hospital","volume":"83","author":"Preutthipan S","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(88)90382-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.5.1230"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00030-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","first-page":"125","article-title":"The role of intrauterine balloon after operative hysteroscopy in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions: a prospective controlled study","volume":"10","author":"Amer MI","year":"2005","journal-title":"Middle East Fertil Soc J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2006.00454.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg368"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.01.137"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.05.027"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","first-page":"511","volume-title":"Endoscopic Surgery for Gynecologists","author":"Wamsteker K","year":"1998"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.01.142"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(78)90322-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.183.5.1831405"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(99)00532-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59942-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000010305"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.03.070"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.034"}],"container-title":["BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2F1471-0528.13353","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1471-0528.13353","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]],"date-time":"2023-10-02T16:44:32Z","timestamp":1696265072000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1471-0528.13353"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,6]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1471-0528.13353"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.13353","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1470-0328","1471-0528"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1470-0328","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-0528","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2014-12-14","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-03-06","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}