{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T00:41:14Z","timestamp":1787013674908,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,26]],"date-time":"2017-07-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501027200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"name":"COHEAHR Network","award":["603019"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["603019"]}]},{"name":"Seventh Framework Programme of DG Research of the European Commission (Brussels)"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BJOG"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VIA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) or with Lugol's iodine (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) have been evaluated for cervical cancer screening in developing countries.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      To assess the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of visual methods to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade\u00a02+ (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      2+) using: (1)\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VIA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      alone; (2)\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      alone; (3) co\u2010testing; and (4)\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      as a triage test of a positive\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VIA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      result.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Search strategy<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      PubMed,\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EMBASE<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      , and the Cochrane Library were searched up to May\u00a02016.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Selection criteria<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      All reports on the accuracy of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VIA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      and\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      , or combinations of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VIA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \/\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      , to detect\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      2+ were identified. Histology and colposcopy when no biopsy was taken were used as the reference standard.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Data collection and analysis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Selected studies were scored on methodological quality, and sensitivity and specificity were computed. Clinical utility was assessed from the positive predictive value (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PPV<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) and the complement of the negative predictive value (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">cNPV<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We included 23 studies comprising 101\u00a0273 women. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      was 88 and 86%, respectively.\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      was more sensitive, but not less specific, compared with\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VIA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      (relative sensitivity\u00a0=\u00a01.11; 95% confidence interval, 95%\u00a0\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      , 1.06\u20131.16; relative specificity\u00a0=\u00a00.98; 95%\u00a0\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      0.95\u20131.01). Co\u2010testing was hardly more sensitive, but significantly less specific, than\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      alone.\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      to triage\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VIA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">POSITIVE<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      women was not less sensitive, but more specific, compared with\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VIA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      alone (relative sensitivity\u00a0=\u00a00.98, 95%\u00a0\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      0.96\u20131.01; relative specificity\u00a0=\u00a01.04, 95%\u00a0\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      1.02\u20131.05). The average\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PPV<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      s were low (range 11\u201316%), whereas the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">cNPV<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      varied between 0.3% (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      , co\u2010testing) and 0.6% (triage).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Although imperfect,\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      alone appeared to be the most useful visual screening strategy.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Tweetable abstract<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VILI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      alone seems to be the most useful visual screening test for cervical cancer screening.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14783","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,12]],"date-time":"2017-06-12T04:22:45Z","timestamp":1497241365000},"page":"545-553","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":62,"title":["Accuracy of combinations of visual inspection using acetic acid or lugol iodine to detect cervical precancer: a meta\u2010analysis"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"125","author":[{"given":"R","family":"Catarino","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Sch\u00e4fer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Vassilakos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research Geneva Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Petignat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Arbyn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Unit of Cancer Epidemiology Belgian Cancer Centre Scientific Institute of Public Health Brussels Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.29210"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2005.10.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdr015"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2407-11-240"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2009.07.016"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","first-page":"954","article-title":"Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low\u2010and middle\u2010income developing countries","volume":"79","author":"Sankaranarayanan R","year":"2001","journal-title":"Bull World Health Organ"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2006.05.121"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2006.05.114"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0142(19981115)83:10<2150::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(98)07033-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.23489"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61195-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(20000815)89:4<826::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO;2-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.10.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.01.019"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12732"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00006-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-8545(21)00289-8","article-title":"Colposcopic differentiation of abnormalities arising in the transformation zone","volume":"20","author":"Coppleson M","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.324.7338.669"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/biostatistics\/kxl004"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1536867X0900900203"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00006"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","volume-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy","author":"Macaskill P","year":"2010"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119013563"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"ArbynM FisherA Martin\u2010HirschPP ZhaoFH QiaoY.Low cost versus other screening tests to detect cervical cancer or precancer in developing countries. The Cochrane Library. 2012.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD010186"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.20190"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.11245"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.12.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0971-5851.103143"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.27633"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_34_1","first-page":"614","article-title":"Single visit approach for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by visual inspection & loop electrosurgical excision procedure","volume":"135","author":"Singla S","year":"2012","journal-title":"Indian J Med Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-509X.138172"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.21972"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0b013e31815f527c"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.04.024"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.11.025"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0013266"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_41_1","first-page":"3469","article-title":"Comparing PAP smear cytology, aided visual inspection, screening colposcopy, cervicography and HPV testing as optional screening tools in Latin America. Study design and baseline data of the LAMS study","volume":"25","author":"Syrj\u00e4nen K","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.07.024"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0b013e318256e5e4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000220505.18525.85"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.091"}],"container-title":["BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2F1471-0528.14783","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14783","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,24]],"date-time":"2023-09-24T05:47:34Z","timestamp":1695534454000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14783"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,26]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1471-0528.14783"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14783","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1470-0328","1471-0528"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1470-0328","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-0528","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2017-05-09","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2017-07-26","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}