{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T17:22:43Z","timestamp":1787160163852,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,21]],"date-time":"2017-08-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1503273600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000024","name":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["APR\u2010126338"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["APR\u2010126338"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000024","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000024","name":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["MAH\u201015445"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["MAH\u201015445"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000024","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BJOG"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To quantify severe perinatal and maternal morbidity\/mortality associated with midcavity operative vaginal delivery compared with caesarean delivery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Population\u2010based, retrospective cohort study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>British Columbia, Canada.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Population<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Term, singleton deliveries (2004\u20132014) by attempted midcavity operative vaginal delivery or caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour, stratified by indication for operative delivery (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a010\u00a0901 deliveries; 5057 indicated for dystocia, 5844 for fetal distress).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Multinomial propensity scores and mulitvariable log\u2010binomial regression models were used to estimate adjusted rate ratios (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ARR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) and 95% confidence intervals (95%\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Composite severe perinatal morbidity\/mortality (e.g. convulsions, severe birth trauma and perinatal death) and severe maternal morbidity (e.g. severe postpartum haemorrhage, shock, sepsis and cardiac complications).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Among deliveries with dystocia, attempted midcavity operative vaginal delivery was associated with higher rates of severe perinatal morbidity\/mortality compared with caesarean delivery (forceps\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ARR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      2.11, 95%\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      1.46\u20133.07; vacuum\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ARR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      2.71, 95%\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      1.49\u20133.15; sequential\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ARR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      4.68, 95%\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      3.33\u20136.58). Rates of severe maternal morbidity\/mortality were also higher following midcavity operative vaginal delivery (forceps\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ARR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      1.57, 95%\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      1.05\u20132.36; vacuum\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ARR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      2.29, 95%\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      1.57\u20133.36). Among deliveries with fetal distress, there were significant increases in severe perinatal morbidity\/mortality following attempted midcavity vacuum (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ARR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      1.28, 95%\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      1.04\u20131.61) and in severe maternal morbidity following attempted midcavity forceps delivery (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ARR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      2.34, 95%\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      1.54\u20133.56).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Attempted midcavity operative vaginal delivery is associated with higher rates of severe perinatal morbidity\/mortality and severe maternal morbidity, though these effects differ by indication and instrument.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Tweetable abstract<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Perinatal and maternal morbidity is increased following midcavity operative vaginal delivery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14820","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,10]],"date-time":"2017-07-10T11:17:01Z","timestamp":1499685421000},"page":"693-702","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":56,"title":["Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"125","author":[{"given":"GM","family":"Muraca","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Population and Public Health University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada"},{"name":"BC Children's Hospital Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Skoll","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada"},{"name":"BC Children's Hospital Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Lisonkova","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Population and Public Health University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada"},{"name":"BC Children's Hospital Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Y","family":"Sabr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology King Saud University King Khalid University Hospital Riyadh Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R","family":"Brant","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"BC Children's Hospital Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada"},{"name":"Department of Statistics University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"GW","family":"Cundiff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada"},{"name":"BC Children's Hospital Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"KS","family":"Joseph","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Population and Public Health University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada"},{"name":"BC Children's Hospital Research Institute Vancouver BC Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"Caughey AB","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001533"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001612"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001557"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412301"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182749ac9"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823835d3"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)06341-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90903-K"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90902-J"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(85)80019-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","volume-title":"Williams Obstetrics","author":"Cunningham FG","year":"2013"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001156"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00356-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2016.04.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0563-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","unstructured":"FrosstG.Validity of pre\u2010pregnancy body mass index (BMI) information derived from a population\u2010based perinatal database. Healthy Mothers and Healthy Babies: New Research and Best Practice Conference 2014. Vancouver British Columbia."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.24095\/hpcdp.29.3.01"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","unstructured":"Perinatal Services British Columbia.Perinatal health report: deliveries in British Columbia 2014\/15. 2016. Vancouver BC. [http:\/\/www.perinatalservicesbc.ca\/Documents\/Data-Surveillance\/Reports\/PHR\/PHR_BC_2014_15.pdf]. Accessed 25 February 2016."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","unstructured":"Perinatal Services British Columbia.Surveillance perinatal indicators annual report: British Columbia residents delivering in British Columbia. 2016. Vancouver BC. [http:\/\/www.perinatalservicesbc.ca\/Documents\/Data-Surveillance\/Indicators\/Annual\/AnnualIndicatorsResidence_2013_14_BC.pdf]. Accessed 25 February 2016."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.85.8_Pt_1.1143"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.5753"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwp425"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/a0019623"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.3782"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0018174"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00273171.2011.568786"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40471-013-0004-y"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1993.tb02381.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.028"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610701325861"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13613"},{"issue":"638","key":"e_1_2_7_35_1","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Evaluation of delivery options for second\u2010stage events","volume":"214","author":"Bailit JL","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02254.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.01463.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-9-55"}],"container-title":["BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2F1471-0528.14820","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14820","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,24]],"date-time":"2023-09-24T06:46:10Z","timestamp":1695537970000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14820"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,21]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1471-0528.14820"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14820","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1470-0328","1471-0528"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1470-0328","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-0528","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2017-07-05","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2017-08-21","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}