{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T19:55:46Z","timestamp":1785614146777,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,27]],"date-time":"2022-04-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651017600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BJOG"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Plain language summary<\/jats:title><jats:p>Increasingly, births around the world are started artificially using medications or other methods. This process is known as induction of labour. As it becomes more common, methods are needed to meet the different clinical needs and birth preferences of women.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Induction of labour typically includes a combination of the medication dinoprostone inserted into the vagina, artificial rupture of membranes (\u2018releasing the waters\u2019), and synthetic oxytocin (hormone given via a drip). This paper reviews some of the methods less commonly used for induction in the UK, namely a drug called misoprostol, which can be given orally or vaginally, and \u2018mechanical\u2019 methods, where labour is started by stretching the cervix (neck of the womb), most commonly with a soft silicone tube with a balloon near the tip, filled with water. Low\u2010dose oral misoprostol tablets are now commercially available in the UK. Other methods for labour induction are not reviewed in detail in this paper.<\/jats:p><jats:p>The evidence suggests mechanical induction of labour (using a balloon catheter) and misoprostol are both at least as safe and effective as using the standard drug, dinoprostone. There is evidence to suggest a balloon catheter may reduce the chance of serious negative outcomes for babies when compared with dinoprostone, and that giving low\u2010dose oral misoprostol results in fewer caesarean births.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Where possible and after informed consent, the method of induction of labour should be personalised to suit the individual woman, her clinical condition, and the setting in which she is giving birth. Local contexts and resources also need to be taken into account. To date, research into women's perspectives and experiences of induction of labour have been significantly lacking.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17136","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,28]],"date-time":"2022-04-28T02:11:15Z","timestamp":1651111875000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Evaluating misoprostol and mechanical methods for induction of labour"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"129","author":[{"given":"Andrew D.","family":"Weeks","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kate","family":"Lightly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ben W.","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julie","family":"Frohlich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Pontefract","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Myfanwy J.","family":"Williams","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","unstructured":"National maternity and perinatal audit clinical report 2019[cited 2021 May 6]. Available from:https:\/\/maternityaudit.org.uk\/Audit\/Charting\/Clinical"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.045"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3310\/hta20650"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.Inducing labour [B] methods for the induction of labour. NICE guideline [NG207];2021[cited 2022 Jan 28]. Available from:https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng207\/evidence\/b\u2010methods\u2010for\u2010the\u2010induction\u2010of\u2010labour\u2010pdf\u20109266825055"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.Insertion of a double balloon catheter for induction of labour in pregnant women without previous caesarean section. NICE Interventional procedures guidance [IPG528];2015[cited 2018 Aug 9]. Available from:https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/IPG528"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","unstructured":"World Health Organization.WHO recommendations for induction of labour.World Health Organization Dept. of Reproductive Health and Research;2011[Updated 2018; cited 2020 Jan 8]. Available from:https:\/\/www.who.int\/reproductivehealth\/publications\/maternal_perinatal_health\/9789241501156\/en\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12181"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","unstructured":"Norgine Pharmaceuticals Limited.Angusta 25 microgram tablets SmPC 2021[cited 2021 Aug 2]. Available from:https:\/\/www.medicines.org.uk\/emc\/product\/12147\/smpc"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.09.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h217"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","article-title":"Low\u2010dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour","volume":"6","author":"Kerr RS","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13546"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"10","author":"Vaan MDT","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00084-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23563"},{"issue":"275","key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","first-page":"e1","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan\u2010S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial)","volume":"220","author":"Saad AF","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","unstructured":"Comparison of misoprostol ripening efficacy with Dilapan (COMRED)[cited 2021 May 6]. Available from:https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT03670836"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","unstructured":"An RCT of a synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for induction of labour in comparison to dinoprostone vaginal insert (SOLVE)[cited 2021 May 6]. Available from:https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT03001661"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001002"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13558"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","article-title":"Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes","volume":"8","author":"Alfirevic Z","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15047"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","article-title":"Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings","volume":"9","author":"Vogel JP","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13876"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2018.10.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_1","unstructured":"Royal College of Midwives.Midwifery care for induction of labour. RCM midwifery blue top guidance No 2.London:RCM;2019[cited 2022 Jan 28]. Available from:https:\/\/www.rcm.org.uk\/media\/5460\/midwifery\u2010care\u2010for\u2010induction\u2010of\u2010labour\u2010a4\u20102019\u201016pp_2v2.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(17)31367-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-026090"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1580608"}],"container-title":["BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17136","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17136","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17136","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,18]],"date-time":"2023-08-18T01:31:59Z","timestamp":1692322319000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17136"}},"subtitle":["Scientific Impact Paper No. 68 April 2022"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,27]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1471-0528.17136"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17136","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1470-0328","1471-0528"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1470-0328","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-0528","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-04-27","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}