{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]],"date-time":"2024-11-01T13:10:08Z","timestamp":1730466608118,"version":"3.28.0"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,26]],"date-time":"2024-08-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1724630400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Forensic Sciences"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Self\u2010induced extreme intoxication akin to automatism (SIEA) is a complicated and controversial legal concept resistant to jurisdictional consensus. In the United States, SIEA has, at times, been considered under the concept of \u201csettled insanity.\u201d. In the United Kingdom, the defense may be allowed for specific intent crimes, though the defendant's awareness of the foreseeability of risk is addressed at trial. In Canada, recent jurisprudence has led to legal and practice landscape changes related to self\u2010induced extreme intoxication. Here, we provide an overview of automatism and an update on the Canadian perspective with a review of the facts and an analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada's landmark decision in <jats:italic>R v. Brown<\/jats:italic>, where the court permitted the SIEA defense to be utilized for general intent crimes and acquitted Matthew Winston Brown, a 26\u2010year\u2010old male with no history of mental illness, with respect to two counts of \u201cbreak and enter\u201d and one count of \u201caggravated assault.\u201d We review the social and legislative response to the changing case law as well as related implications for expert testimony, which may be provided by forensic mental health professionals. Given the judicial and legal implications of the recent changes for both perpetrators and victims of violent crime and given the dynamic international landscape on extreme intoxication in criminal law, the review is thought to be of interest to a broad category of stakeholders including policymakers and those working in forensic psychiatry and law.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/1556-4029.15611","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,26]],"date-time":"2024-08-26T11:03:51Z","timestamp":1724670231000},"page":"2103-2109","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Self\u2010induced extreme intoxication akin to automatism: A psycholegal tug of war"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"69","author":[{"given":"Dennis","family":"Curry","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychiatry Western University  London Ontario Canada"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Amir","family":"Rezaei\u00a0Ardani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine &amp; Dentistry University of Western Ontario  London Ontario Canada"},{"name":"Southwest Centre for Forensic Mental Health Care, St. Joseph's Health Care London  St. Thomas Ontario Canada"},{"name":"Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center Mashhad University of Medical Sciences  Mashhad Iran"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jason","family":"Quinn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychiatry Western University  London Ontario Canada"},{"name":"Southwest Centre for Forensic Mental Health Care, St. Joseph's Health Care London  St. Thomas Ontario Canada"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_11_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.29158\/JAAPL.230042\u201023"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_11_3_1","first-page":"172","article-title":"Intoxication and settled insanity: a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity","volume":"35","author":"Feix J","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Am Acad Psychiatry Law"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.29158\/JAAPL.210138\u201021"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_5_1","unstructured":"Supreme Court of Canada.R. v. Stone [1999] 2 S.C.R. 290.https:\/\/decisions.scc\u2010csc.ca\/scc\u2010csc\/scc\u2010csc\/en\/item\/1705\/index.do. Accessed 15 Jun 2024."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_6_1","unstructured":"Supreme Court of Canada.R. v. Brown [2022] SCC 18.https:\/\/decisions.scc\u2010csc.ca\/scc\u2010csc\/scc\u2010csc\/en\/item\/19389\/index.do. Accessed 15 Jun 2024."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_7_1","unstructured":"Supreme Court of Canada.R. v. Daviault [1994] 3 S.C.R. 63.https:\/\/decisions.scc\u2010csc.ca\/scc\u2010csc\/scc\u2010csc\/en\/item\/1172\/index.do. Accessed 15 Jun 2024."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_8_1","unstructured":"Supreme Court of Canada.Leary v. The Queen [1978] 1 S.C.R. 29.https:\/\/decisions.scc\u2010csc.ca\/scc\u2010csc\/scc\u2010csc\/en\/item\/2567\/index.do. Accessed 15 Jun 2024."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_9_1","unstructured":"Parliament of Canada.Bill C\u201072.https:\/\/www.parl.ca\/documentviewer\/en\/35\u20101\/bill\/C\u201072\/royal\u2010assent\/page\u201016. Accessed 15 Jun 2024."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_10_1","unstructured":"R v Brown.ABQB 166.2020.https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ab\/abqb\/doc\/2020\/2020abqb166\/2020abqb166.html. Accessed 16 Jun 2024."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_11_1","unstructured":"Parliament of Canada.Bill C\u201028.https:\/\/www.parl.ca\/DocumentViewer\/en\/44\u20101\/bill\/C\u201028\/royal\u2010assent. Accessed 16 Jun 2024."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_12_1","first-page":"2","article-title":"Sullivan, Chan and Brown: the Supreme Court answers (and raises) questions about extreme intoxication and stare decisis","volume":"13","author":"Gates L","year":"2023","journal-title":"Crown's Newslet"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4222393"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_11_14_1","first-page":"635","article-title":"Making it up as we go: inconsistencies in New Zealand's approach to intoxication and addiction at sentencing","volume":"54","author":"Whyte L","year":"2023","journal-title":"Law Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_15_1","unstructured":"Supreme Court of Canada.r. v. Bernard [1988] 2 S.C.R. 833.https:\/\/decisions.scc\u2010csc.ca\/scc\u2010csc\/scc\u2010csc\/en\/item\/388\/index.do. Accessed 15 Jun 2024."}],"container-title":["Journal of Forensic Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1556-4029.15611","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]],"date-time":"2024-11-01T12:46:00Z","timestamp":1730465160000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1556-4029.15611"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,26]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1556-4029.15611"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1556-4029.15611","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-1198","1556-4029"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0022-1198"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1556-4029"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-07-09","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-08-14","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-08-26","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}