{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,10]],"date-time":"2025-04-10T02:43:29Z","timestamp":1744253009078},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,28]],"date-time":"2016-07-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1469664000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Med Imag Rad Onc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p>Several different neutral oral contrast agents have been trialled in magnetic resonance and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> enterography (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CTE<\/jats:styled-content>). In the Auckland region, Mannitol 2.5% and VoLumen are both used in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CTE<\/jats:styled-content>. This study compares the performance of these two neutral oral contrast agents in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CTE<\/jats:styled-content>.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Computed tomography enterography data were collected from 25 consecutive studies that used either Mannitol or VoLumen in 2014. All images were reviewed by three radiologists blinded to the type of oral contrast. Each quadrant was assessed for maximum distension, proportion of bowel loops distended, presence of inhomogeneous content and bowel wall visibility. Assessment also included whether the contrast agent reached the caecum and an overall subjective quality assessment. Patients were invited to answer a questionnaire regarding tolerability of the preparations.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Mannitol achieves better wall visibility in the right upper quadrant, left upper quadrant and left lower quadrant (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01). Overall differences in study quality favours Mannitol (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01) with 48% of the Mannitol studies being considered excellent compared with 4% of the VoLumen studies. There was no difference in maximal distension or proportion of loops distended.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Mannitol in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CTE<\/jats:styled-content> achieves studies of a better quality than and is a viable alternative to VoLumen.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/1754-9485.12486","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,13]],"date-time":"2016-10-13T02:23:43Z","timestamp":1476325423000},"page":"593-598","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["<scp>CT<\/scp> enterography: Mannitol versus VoLumen"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"60","author":[{"given":"Jessica","family":"Wong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Helen","family":"Moore","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Roger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology Forth Valley Royal Hospital Larbert UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chris","family":"McKee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology Waitemata District Health Board Auckland New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5507\/bp.2010.019"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/27973476"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2012.08.021"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.263055162"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2008.11.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2281020161"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.05.1079"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/S0100-39842012000300004"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","first-page":"732","article-title":"Evaluation of bowel distension and mural visualisation using neutral oral contrast agents for multidetector\u2010row computed tomography","volume":"53","author":"Lim BK","year":"2012","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v11.i15.2324"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.13.6140"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","first-page":"293","article-title":"Main features of Crohn's disease: Agreement between MR\u2010enterography and CT\u2010enterography","volume":"17","author":"Amitai M","year":"2015","journal-title":"Isr Med Assoc J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carj.2014.05.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MNM.0b013e328318b355"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1754-9485.12256"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.3193"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20140100"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","first-page":"948","article-title":"Evaluation of bowel distension and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi\u2010detector row CT","volume":"241","author":"Megibow AJ","year":"2006","journal-title":"Radiology"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2F1754-9485.12486","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2F1754-9485.12486","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1754-9485.12486","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T20:34:35Z","timestamp":1695501275000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1754-9485.12486"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,28]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1754-9485.12486"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1754-9485.12486","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1754-9477","1754-9485"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1754-9477","type":"print"},{"value":"1754-9485","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2016-01-11","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2016-05-18","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2016-07-28","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}