{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T00:29:15Z","timestamp":1747182555774,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,15]],"date-time":"2019-05-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1557878400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Med Imag Rad Onc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p>Cystic fibrosis (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CF<\/jats:styled-content>) predominantly affects young adults. Accurate radiological assessment of pulmonary disease is vital for predicting exacerbations, one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the image quality of model\u2010based iterative reconstruction (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MBIR<\/jats:styled-content>) ultra\u2010low\u2010dose <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> chest (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ULD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content>) in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CF<\/jats:styled-content> evaluation.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>We compared <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ULD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> with standard adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ASIR<\/jats:styled-content>) low\u2010dose <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content>). Subjective assessment of contrast and noise were performed for each study. Background noise, signal to noise ratio (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SNR<\/jats:styled-content>) and contrast to noise ratio (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CNR<\/jats:styled-content>) were calculated and compared between the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> studies. Conspicuity of major structures was assessed. These aspects of image quality were compared to determine whether <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ULD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> was superior to <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> in assessment of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CF<\/jats:styled-content>.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ULD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> achieved median effective dose of 0.073 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">mS<\/jats:styled-content>v, comparable to one standard chest radiograph and significantly lower than the median <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> dose of 1.22 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">mS<\/jats:styled-content>v. <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ULD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> had lower subjective contrast and higher subjective noise when compared to <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content>. Objectively measured background noise was lower in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ULD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> (16.33 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HU<\/jats:styled-content> vs 38.53 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HU<\/jats:styled-content>,<jats:italic> P\u00a0<\/jats:italic>&lt;<jats:italic>\u00a0<\/jats:italic>0.0001) compared to <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content>. <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ULD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> had higher median <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CNR<\/jats:styled-content> (52.65 vs 22.09, <jats:italic>P\u00a0<\/jats:italic>&lt;<jats:italic>\u00a0<\/jats:italic>0.0001) and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SNR<\/jats:styled-content> in lung (9.08 vs 7.29, <jats:italic>P\u00a0<\/jats:italic>=<jats:italic>\u00a0<\/jats:italic>0.002) compared to <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content>. <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ULD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> was equal to <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> in identification of trachea, bronchi, pleural and pericardium. Interobserver reliability showed agreement of 80\u201392%.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>The image quality of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ULD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> is similar to <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content>, at 1\/16th the dose. <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MBIR<\/jats:styled-content> constructed <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ULD<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CT<\/jats:styled-content> is an effective imaging modality for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CF<\/jats:styled-content> surveillance, with potential applications in other disease settings.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/1754-9485.12895","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,15]],"date-time":"2019-05-15T10:35:34Z","timestamp":1557916534000},"page":"602-609","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Image quality comparison between model\u2010based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction chest computed tomography in cystic fibrosis patients"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"63","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8959-1828","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sandra","family":"Lin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Austin Health Melbourne Victoria Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Monica","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Diagnostic Imaging Monash Health Melbourne Victoria Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kenneth K","family":"Lau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Diagnostic Imaging Monash Health Melbourne Victoria Australia"},{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5694\/mja11.10719"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jrr\/rru019"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4329\/wjr.v8.i4.331"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.09.2953"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.ob013e3181dzfeec"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.11101450"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","article-title":"The model\u2010based paradigm: a new frontier in image reconstruction","author":"Thibault J\u2010B","year":"2011","journal-title":"CT Clarity (GE Healthcare)"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.12.8986"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","first-page":"90335J","article-title":"Noise performance of statistical model based iterative reconstruction in clinical CT systems","author":"Li K","year":"2014","journal-title":"Phys Med Imag"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-012-2627-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4881148"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000004456"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.15132091"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-011-2227-y"},{"volume-title":"Practical Statistics for Medical Research","year":"2006","author":"Altman DG","key":"e_1_2_5_16_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0b013e3182562a89"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0138329"},{"volume-title":"The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging","year":"2012","author":"Bushberg JT","key":"e_1_2_5_19_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DodgeCT TammEP CodyDDet\u00a0al.Performance evaluation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for achieving CT radiation dose reduction \u2014 a phantom study.2016. Vol. 17. 2016.","DOI":"10.1120\/jacmp.v17i2.5709"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_1","first-page":"16262","volume-title":"European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography","author":"Menzel HG","year":"2000"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.06.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00247-012-2554-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2342-13-27"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.07.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_26_1","first-page":"77","article-title":"Coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction vs. filtered back projection: evaluation of image quality","volume":"86","author":"Arcadi T","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Biomed"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-017-1140-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0b013e31827efc3a"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00247-015-3281-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-4126-0"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2F1754-9485.12895","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1754-9485.12895","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/1754-9485.12895","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1754-9485.12895","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,8]],"date-time":"2023-09-08T17:33:14Z","timestamp":1694194394000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1754-9485.12895"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,15]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1754-9485.12895"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1754-9485.12895","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1754-9477","1754-9485"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1754-9477"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1754-9485"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2018-12-28","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2019-04-10","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2019-05-15","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}