{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T11:50:34Z","timestamp":1791373834140,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Wiley","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791331200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791331200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Med Imag Rad Onc"],"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Mammography guided vacuum\u2010assisted biopsy (MG\u2010VAB) is the preferred method for histological diagnosis of screening mammography detected microcalcifications, yet the influence of breast density as well as other patient and procedure\u2010specific factors on retrieval remains underexplored. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of patient and procedure\u2010specific factors on MG\u2010VAB microcalcification retrieval rates.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective cohort study of 803 consecutive MG\u2010VAB procedures for breast calcifications performed between August 2017 and May 2023 in the BreastScreen ACT population was conducted. Patient data collected included age, breast density, compressed breast thickness, lesion quadrant, calcification size, nipple\u2010to\u2010lesion distance, biopsy approach, specimen radiography visibility as well as presence on pathology. Bayesian logistic regression with weakly informative priors was applied to estimate microcalcification retrieval rates (MRR) and 90% credible intervals.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The overall median MRR was 98.27% (790\/803). Retrieval remained high across age groups (96.4%\u201399.6%), breast density (95.1%\u201398.7%), lesion quadrants (96.8%\u201399.1%), biopsy approach (97.9%\u201398.6%). Continuous factors such as compressed breast thickness, calcification size and nipple\u2010to\u2010lesion distance demonstrated stable retrieval across ranges.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>MG\u2010VAB achieves consistently high microcalcification retrieval rates across a range of patient and procedural factors, including breast density. These findings reinforce its role as the first line diagnostic method for screening detected microcalcifications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/1754-9485.70201","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T10:59:08Z","timestamp":1791370748000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Impact of Breast Density and Other Factors on Mammography Guided Vacuum Assisted Breast Biopsy Microcalcification Retrieval Rates"],"prefix":"10.1111","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-6387-6359","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Neha","family":"Paranjape","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Imaging The Canberra Hospital, ACT Health  Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fiona Yee Sang","family":"Wong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Imaging The Canberra Hospital, ACT Health  Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Richard Andrew","family":"Burns","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health The Australian National University  Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tarun","family":"Jain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Imaging The Canberra Hospital, ACT Health  Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia"},{"name":"Breastscreen ACT. Canberra Health Services  Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_11_2_1","unstructured":"Australian Institute of Health and Welfare \u201cCancer Data in Australia [Internet] \u201d(2024) Australian Institute of Health and Welfare https:\/\/www.aihw.gov.au\/reports\/cancer\/cancer\u2010data\u2010in\u2010australia\/contents\/about."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0300060518770577"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244\u2010019\u20100803\u2010x"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11845-018-1781-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.208.1.9646821"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2383041953"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12880\u2010022\u201000896\u20101"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_9_1","first-page":"354","article-title":"The Causes of Failure in Removing Calcium in \u201cMicrocalcification Only\u201d Lesions at 11\u2010Gauge Stereotactic Vacuum\u2010Assisted Biopsy","volume":"18","author":"Gumus H.","year":"2011","journal-title":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2023.04.074"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdm481"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1754-9485.70201","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/1754-9485.70201","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1754-9485.70201","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T10:59:10Z","timestamp":1791370750000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1754-9485.70201"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"references-count":10,"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1754-9485.70201"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1754-9485.70201","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1754-9477","1754-9485"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1754-9477","type":"print"},{"value":"1754-9485","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-12-08","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-09-25","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-10-07","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"1754-9485.70201"}}