{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,8]],"date-time":"2026-03-08T18:08:48Z","timestamp":1772993328122,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,2]],"date-time":"2015-11-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1446422400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Cardiovascular Therapeutics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Summary<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>The routine use of vascular imaging including intravascular ultrasound (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IVUS<\/jats:styled-content>) and optical coherence tomography (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OCT<\/jats:styled-content>) in guiding percutaneous coronary interventions (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCI<\/jats:styled-content>) is still controversial especially when using drug\u2010eluting stents. A meta\u2010analysis of trials using bare metal stents was previously published.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>We conducted a meta\u2010analysis of available published trials that compared imaging\u2010guided <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCI<\/jats:styled-content> and angiography\u2010guided <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCI<\/jats:styled-content> in patients undergoing routine <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCI<\/jats:styled-content> only. Trials that enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome were excluded to decrease heterogeneity. We aimed to study both drug\u2010eluting stents (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content>) as well as bare metal stents (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BMS<\/jats:styled-content>). We identified seven randomized controlled trials on <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IVUS<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010guided bare metal stents. We also identified three randomized controlled trials on <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IVUS<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010guided drug\u2010eluting stents. To improve the power of the drug\u2010eluting stent data, we identified, and included, nine registries that compared <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IVUS<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010guided <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCI<\/jats:styled-content> to angiography\u2010guided <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCI<\/jats:styled-content> in the drug\u2010eluting stent era. Nonrandomized registries that included <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BMS<\/jats:styled-content> only were excluded as there are multiple previous meta\u2010analyses that studied these patients. Finally, we identified one registry that compared <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OCT<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010guided <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCI<\/jats:styled-content> to angiography\u2010guided <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCI<\/jats:styled-content> using either a <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BMS<\/jats:styled-content> or a <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content>. A total of 14,197 patients were studied overall. The meta\u2010analysis was conducted using a random effect model.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Imaging guidance was associated with a significantly larger postintervention minimal luminal diameter (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SMD<\/jats:styled-content>: 0.289. 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>: 0.213\u20130.365. <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01).<\/jats:p><jats:p>Imaging\u2010guided stenting was associated with a significant decrease in the major adverse cardiac events (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MACE<\/jats:styled-content>) in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> patients (odds ratio: 0.810. 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>: 0.719\u20130.912. <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01) and combined <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BMS<\/jats:styled-content> patients (odds ratio: 0.782. 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>: 0.686\u20130.890. <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01). Imaging guidance was associated with significantly lower events of death from all causes in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> patients (odds ratio: 0.654. 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>: 0.468\u20130.916. <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01) and in the combined <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BMS<\/jats:styled-content> patients (odds ratio: 0.727. 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>: 0.540\u20130.980. <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01).<\/jats:p><jats:p>The risk of myocardial infarction (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MI<\/jats:styled-content>) was significantly lower with imaging guidance in both, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> patients (odds ratio: 0.551. 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>: 0.363\u20130.837. <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01) and combined <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BMS<\/jats:styled-content> patients (odds ratio: 0.589. 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>: 0.425\u20130.816. <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01). This may, in part, be explained by the significantly lower risk of stent thrombosis in imaging\u2010guided <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> patients (odds ratio: 0.651. 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>: 0.499\u20130.850. <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01) and combined <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BMS<\/jats:styled-content> patients (odds ratio: 0.665. 95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>: 0.513\u20130.862. <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.01). Patients who received a <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> showed no difference between imaging guidance and angiography guidance in repeated target lesion revascularization, while the analysis of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BMS<\/jats:styled-content> alone and the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BMS<\/jats:styled-content> combined showed significant superiority of the imaging\u2010guided <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCI<\/jats:styled-content> group.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Imaging\u2010guided <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCI<\/jats:styled-content> significantly lowered the risk of death, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MI<\/jats:styled-content>, stent thrombosis, and the combined <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MACE<\/jats:styled-content> in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010implanted patients and all stented patients (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content> or <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BMS<\/jats:styled-content>). However, imaging guidance had no significant effect on repeated target vessel or target lesion revascularization in patients who received <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DES<\/jats:styled-content>, likely due to the effect of the drug in the stent.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/1755-5922.12160","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,12]],"date-time":"2015-09-12T15:40:55Z","timestamp":1442072455000},"page":"360-366","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta\u2010Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug\u2010Eluting Stent Trials"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Said","family":"Alsidawi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Cardiovascular Health and Diseases University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati OH USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mohamed","family":"Effat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Cardiovascular Health and Diseases University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati OH USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shahid","family":"Rahman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Cardiovascular Health and Diseases University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati OH USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mouhamad","family":"Abdallah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Cardiovascular Health and Diseases University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati OH USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Massoud","family":"Leesar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Cardiovascular Diseases University of Alabama Birmingham AL USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ahj.2007.06.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.778647"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0735-1097(98)00249-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/140174301750164673"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.0000043240.87526.3F"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.102.20.2497"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/hc3701.096064"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.22244"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2012.11.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ahj.2012.09.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.23279"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2004.10.042"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.24601"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2011.07.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ahj.2010.10.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2012.03.059"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.799494"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehn249"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2010.04.016"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4244\/EIJV8I7A125"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.10537"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2010.09.030"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/S0066-782X2011005000118"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","first-page":"106","article-title":"Angioplasty guided by intravascular ultrasound: meta\u2010analysis of randomized clinical trials","volume":"101","author":"Figueiredo Neto JA","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arq Bras Cardiol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4244\/EIJV8I7A129"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2013.10.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2013.09.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2013.12.043"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003942"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.recesp.2014.07.026"}],"container-title":["Cardiovascular Therapeutics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2F1755-5922.12160","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/1755-5922.12160","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,3]],"date-time":"2023-10-03T11:42:02Z","timestamp":1696333322000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1755-5922.12160"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,2]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/1755-5922.12160"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1755-5922.12160","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-5914","1755-5922"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1755-5914","type":"print"},{"value":"1755-5922","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,2]]}}}