{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,27]],"date-time":"2026-06-27T20:12:30Z","timestamp":1782591150718,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"S2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,10]],"date-time":"2017-01-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1484006400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Addiction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title>To assess the relative impact of brief treatment (BT) compared with brief intervention (BI) on changes in substance use behavior in primary care screening programs for substance use disorders, overall and by patient severity.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Design and participants<\/jats:title>A total of 9029 patients with both baseline and follow\u2010up interviews were identified in the US Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) data from October 2004 and February 2008. Using a propensity score framework, multiple generalized linear mixed models and a local linear matching method with a difference in difference estimator, patients from the BI group that resemble BT patients were used to determine the relative treatment effect of BT. A total of 3218 of these US patients with baseline and follow\u2010up interviews were used in the final analysis sample after the propensity score\u2010matching procedure (1448 patients assigned to a BI service category and 1770 assigned to a BT service category).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Setting<\/jats:title>United States.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Measurements<\/jats:title>Dependent variables were the number of days of use in the past 30\u00a0days of any alcohol, alcohol to intoxication, illicit drugs and marijuana.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Findings<\/jats:title>The relative impact of BT was not significant for alcohol (0.269; P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0>\u00a00.1) or alcohol to intoxication (0.462; P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0>\u00a00.1). BT was found to reduce the frequency of use of illicit drugs at follow\u2010up by 0.634 days more than BI (P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0<\u00a00.05). Marijuana days were not affected significantly by assignment to BT (\u22120.128; P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0>\u00a00.1). Higher severity patients assigned to BT had a decrease in days of illicit drug use of 1.765 (P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0<\u00a00.05).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Conclusions<\/jats:title>In the United States, brief treatment appears to have a stronger impact on reducing illicit drug use than brief intervention but is similar to brief intervention for reducing alcohol use, alcohol to intoxication and marijuana use alone.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/add.13653","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,13]],"date-time":"2017-01-13T10:06:31Z","timestamp":1484301991000},"page":"54-64","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["The relative impact of brief treatment versus brief intervention in primary health\u2010care screening programs for substance use disorders"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"112","author":[{"given":"Arnie","family":"Aldridge","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"RTI International Research Triangle Park Durham NC USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"William","family":"Dowd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"RTI International Research Triangle Park Durham NC USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeremy","family":"Bray","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of North Carolina Bryan School of Business and Economics Greensboro NC USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1360-0443.2002.00018.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.drugalcdep.2010.02.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-006X.68.5.898"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.drugalcdep.2008.08.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1553-2712.2009.00549.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004148.pub3"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1999.10473858"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2009.00602.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0141347300006583"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","volume-title":"Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior","author":"Miller W. R.","year":"1991"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00820.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","unstructured":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.Helping patients who drink too much: a clinician's guide. Updated 2005 edn. NIH Publication no. 07\u20103769. Rockville MD: Author;2007."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4613-2191-0_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosenbaum P. R. Rubin D. B.Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc1984;79:516\u2013524.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1984.10478078"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/h0037350"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/pan\/mpl013"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/03610910902859574"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2006.00130.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-937X.00044"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2004.04.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_1","volume-title":"PSMATCH2: Stata Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Imbalance Testing","author":"Leuven E.","year":"2003"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-006X.72.3.455"}],"container-title":["Addiction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fadd.13653","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/add.13653","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,25]],"date-time":"2023-09-25T13:48:01Z","timestamp":1695649681000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/add.13653"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,10]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"S2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/add.13653"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/add.13653","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0965-2140","1360-0443"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0965-2140","type":"print"},{"value":"1360-0443","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2014-04-14","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-12-07","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2017-01-10","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}