{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,2]],"date-time":"2025-11-02T16:51:42Z","timestamp":1762102302955,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,8]],"date-time":"2018-11-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1541635200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Aust NZ J Obst Gynaeco"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p>The incidence of placenta accreta (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PA<\/jats:styled-content>) has markedly increased in the United States, from 1\/30\u00a0000 in 1950 to 1\/731 deliveries in 2011. Although placenta praevia after prior caesarean sections (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS<\/jats:styled-content>) is the most important risk factor for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PA<\/jats:styled-content>, other risk factors make up 1\u20135% of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PA<\/jats:styled-content> occurrences. At our referral hospital, we use the pre\u2010caesarean prophylactic balloon catheter with or without post\u2010surgery embolisation in a hybrid room. Here, we evaluate the role of prior <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS<\/jats:styled-content> and placenta praevia on the outcome of this procedure.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This retrospective cohort analysis included 61 women during the years 2004\u20132016 with sonographic suspicion of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PA<\/jats:styled-content> who underwent balloon catheterisation prior to <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS<\/jats:styled-content>.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Eleven women had no previous <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS<\/jats:styled-content> (18%). Mean previous <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS<\/jats:styled-content> rate was 1.85. Six women (9.8%) had previous dilatation and curettage (D&amp;C); 36.4% of women with no previous <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS<\/jats:styled-content> had previous D&amp;C compared with 4% of women with previous <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS<\/jats:styled-content> (<jats:italic>P\u00a0<\/jats:italic>=<jats:italic>\u00a0<\/jats:italic>0.008). Placenta praevia was sonographically diagnosed in 55 women (90.2%). There was a higher rate of caesarean hysterectomy in women with previous <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS<\/jats:styled-content> than in those without (32% vs 0%, <jats:italic>P\u00a0<\/jats:italic>=<jats:italic>\u00a0<\/jats:italic>0.052) but no significant difference in blood product requirements (45.5% vs 66%, <jats:italic>P\u00a0<\/jats:italic>=<jats:italic>\u00a0<\/jats:italic>0.303). There was no significant difference in hysterectomy rate, blood transfusion or surgery duration between women with and without placenta praevia (<jats:italic>P\u00a0<\/jats:italic>=<jats:italic>\u00a0<\/jats:italic>0.648, 0.594, 0.995, respectively).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Previous <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS<\/jats:styled-content> rather than placenta praevia is a strong indicator of hysterectomy in cases of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PA<\/jats:styled-content>. Different risk factors for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PA<\/jats:styled-content> do not affect blood transfusion rates or surgery duration.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12921","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,9]],"date-time":"2018-11-09T06:42:07Z","timestamp":1541745727000},"page":"528-532","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["The use of pre\u2010caesarean prophylactic intra\u2010arterial balloon catheters for suspected placenta accreta"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"59","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0893-2796","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maya","family":"Frank Wolf","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Galilee Medical Center  Nahariya Israel"},{"name":"Azrieli Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee Bar Ilan University  Safed Israel"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jonathan","family":"Singer\u2010Jordan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Azrieli Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee Bar Ilan University  Safed Israel"},{"name":"Department of Interventional Radiology Galilee Medical Center  Nahariya Israel"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Oleg","family":"Shnaider","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Galilee Medical Center  Nahariya Israel"},{"name":"Azrieli Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee Bar Ilan University  Safed Israel"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ala","family":"Aiob","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Galilee Medical Center  Nahariya Israel"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Inshirah","family":"Sgayer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Galilee Medical Center  Nahariya Israel"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jacob","family":"Bornstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Galilee Medical Center  Nahariya Israel"},{"name":"Azrieli Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee Bar Ilan University  Safed Israel"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,8]]},"reference":[{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2008.04.008"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70463-0"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.074"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0052893"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.04.037"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000722"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816569f2"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1926"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13327"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.598585"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.594467"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182051db2"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.08.019"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318262e340"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00727.x"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","DOI":"10.1097\/01.RVI.0000086532.86489.97"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.037"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.007"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001113"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1992.11.7.333"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)91056-I"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","DOI":"10.1111\/1754-9485.12560"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12090"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1220526"}],"container-title":["Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fajo.12921","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/ajo.12921","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,10]],"date-time":"2023-09-10T07:28:40Z","timestamp":1694330920000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/ajo.12921"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,8]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/ajo.12921"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ajo.12921","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0004-8666","1479-828X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0004-8666"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1479-828X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2018-03-22","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-10-01","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-11-08","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}