{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T03:26:43Z","timestamp":1761017203686,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1-2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,21]],"date-time":"2017-09-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1505952000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["ANZ Journal of Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>The New Zealand Rotator Cuff Registry was established in 2009 to collect prospective functional, pain and outcome data on patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RCR<\/jats:styled-content>).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Information collected included an operation day technical questionnaire completed by the surgeon and Flex <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">Shoulder Function (SF)<\/jats:styled-content> functional and pain scores preoperatively, immediately post\u2010operatively and at 6, 12 and 24 months. A multivariate analysis was performed analysing the three surgical approaches to determine if there was a difference in pain or functional outcome scores.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 2418 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RCRs<\/jats:styled-content> were included in this paper. There were 418 (17.3%) arthroscopic, 956 (39.5%) mini\u2010open and 1044 (43.2%) open procedures. Twenty\u2010four\u2010month follow\u2010up data were obtained for pain and Flex <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SF<\/jats:styled-content> in 71% of patients. At 24 months, there was no difference in the average Flex <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SF<\/jats:styled-content> score for the arthroscopic, mini\u2010open and open groups. There was no difference in improvement in Flex <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SF<\/jats:styled-content> score at 24 months. At 24 months, there was no difference in mean pain scores. There was no difference in improvement in pain score from preoperation to 24 months. Most patients returned to work within 3 months of surgery, with no difference between the three surgical approaches.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RCR<\/jats:styled-content> has good to excellent outcomes in terms of improvement in pain and function at 2\u2010year follow\u2010up. We found no difference in pain or functional outcome at 24 months between arthroscopic, open and mini\u2010open approaches for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RCR<\/jats:styled-content>.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.14176","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,21]],"date-time":"2017-09-21T23:02:50Z","timestamp":1506034970000},"page":"50-55","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Arthroscopic, open and mini\u2010open approach for rotator cuff repair: no difference in pain or function at 24 months"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"88","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1343-5658","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elizabeth C.","family":"Bond","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopaedic Department Wellington Regional Hospital, Capital &amp; Coast District Health Board  Wellington New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lynette","family":"Hunt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Statistics The University of Waikato  Hamilton New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Matthew J.","family":"Brick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthosports North Harbour Millennium Institute  Auckland New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Warren B.","family":"Leigh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthosports North Harbour Millennium Institute  Auckland New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anthony","family":"Maher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopaedic Department, Taranaki District Health Board  New Plymouth New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Simon W.","family":"Young","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopaedic Department Wellington Regional Hospital, Capital &amp; Coast District Health Board  Wellington New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael A.","family":"Caughey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Auckland Orthopaedic Consultants  Auckland New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2013.11.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2013.12.013","article-title":"Arthroscopic versus open shoulder stabilization: current practice patterns in the United States","volume":"30","author":"Zhang A","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2013.07.265"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csm.2012.07.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","first-page":"592","article-title":"Outcomes of arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a systematic review of the literature","volume":"39","author":"Lindley K","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am. J. Orthop."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00263"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2004.09.024"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-200307000-00006"},{"volume-title":"Musculoskeletal Outcomes Measures and Instruments","year":"2005","author":"Suk M","key":"e_1_2_7_10_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199173070-00004"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2010.11.019","article-title":"Shoulder: long term survivorship and outcomes after surgical repair of full thickness rotator cuff tears","volume":"20","author":"Millett PJ","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Shoulder Elbow Surg."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-015-3515-x","article-title":"State of the art in rotator cuff repair","volume":"23","author":"Randelli P","year":"2015","journal-title":"Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sart.2010.06.001","article-title":"Rotator cuff repair should be done arthroscopically: body of evidence\u2010affirms","volume":"21","author":"Laskovski JR","year":"2010","journal-title":"Sem. Arthroplasty"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.2519\/jospt.2009.2918","article-title":"Open, mini\u2010open and all\u2010arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery: indications and implications for rehabilitation","volume":"39","author":"Ghodadra NS","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2009.05.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2009.10.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.08.022","article-title":"Clinical outcome in all\u2010arthroscopic versus mini\u2010open rotator cuff repair in small to medium\u2010sized tears: a randomized controlled trial in 100 patients with 1\u2010year follow\u2010up","volume":"29","author":"Zwaal P","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-008-0661-4","article-title":"An analysis of outcome of arthroscopic versus mini\u2010open rotator cuff repair using subjective and objective scoring tools","volume":"17","author":"Colgate\u2010Stone T","year":"2009","journal-title":"Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.09.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546508322903"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-013-1263-5","article-title":"Arthroscopic versus mini\u2010open rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized study with 24\u2010month follow\u2010up","volume":"24","author":"Zhang Z","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20120822-20"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-011-1262-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e94421","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0094421","article-title":"All\u2010arthroscopic versus mini\u2010open repair of small to large sized rotator cuff rears: a meta\u2010analysis of clinical outcomes","volume":"9","author":"Shan L","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"}],"container-title":["ANZ Journal of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fans.14176","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/ans.14176","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,24]],"date-time":"2023-09-24T12:49:03Z","timestamp":1695559743000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/ans.14176"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,21]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1-2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/ans.14176"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ans.14176","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1445-1433","1445-2197"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1445-1433"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1445-2197"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2017-02-07","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2017-07-12","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2017-09-21","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}