{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T22:27:05Z","timestamp":1792189625664,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,23]],"date-time":"2014-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1395532800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To assess birth preferences in a sample of Hungarian pregnant women and identify determinants of ambivalence or clear choices for cesarean section throughout pregnancy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Follow\u2010up two\u2010point questionnaire survey.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Hungary.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Sample<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 413 women with singleton pregnancies where there was no awareness of medical contradictions to vaginal delivery, attending for routine ultrasound examination in mid\u2010pregnancy from November 2011 to March 2012.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Questionnaires completed in mid\u2010 and late pregnancy (gestational weeks 18\u201322 and 35\u201337) including the Wijma Delivery Expectancy\/Experience Questionnaire A.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Prevalence of women preferring cesarean section or being uncertain about what delivery route to choose, in case they had the choice; their demographic characteristics, attitudes toward birth issues and their Wijma Delivery Expectancy\/Experience Questionnaire A scores, compared with women consistent in their preference for vaginal delivery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of the 413 respondents, 365 (88.4%) were consistent in their preference for vaginal delivery. In logistic regression models the important contributors to describing preferences for cesarean section or uncertain preferences were previous cesarean section and maternal belief that cesarean section is more beneficial than vaginal delivery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The majority of pregnant women preferred vaginal delivery to cesarean section. Neither a higher Wijma Delivery Expectancy\/Experience Questionnaire A score nor sociodemographic differences were important determinants of a preference for cesarean section or for an uncertain preference. On the other hand, previous cesarean section and certain preconceived maternal attitudes towards delivery were characteristic for these women.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12353","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,17]],"date-time":"2014-02-17T05:29:39Z","timestamp":1392614979000},"page":"408-415","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"93","author":[{"given":"Di\u00e1na","family":"Dweik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Szeged Szeged Hungary"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Edmond","family":"Girasek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Services Management Training Centre Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Annam\u00e1ria","family":"T\u00f6reki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Szeged Szeged Hungary"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gyula","family":"M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Szeged Szeged Hungary"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Attila","family":"P\u00e1l","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Szeged Szeged Hungary"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_10_2_1","unstructured":"Tauffer Database.National Institute for Quality and Organizational Development in Healthcare and Medicine. Available online at:http:\/\/193.225.50.35\/webgy\/regbe\/belepes.php. (accessed 30 May 2013)."},{"key":"e_1_2_10_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d7657"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_4_1","first-page":"191","article-title":"A Sz\u00fcl\u00e9szeti \u00e9s N\u0151gy\u00f3gy\u00e1szati Szakmai Koll\u00e9gium 2003. febru\u00e1r 28\u2010i \u00e1ll\u00e1sfoglal\u00e1sa a cs\u00e1sz\u00e1rmetsz\u00e9sek ar\u00e1ny\u00e1nak alakul\u00e1s\u00e1val \u00e9s a tov\u00e1bbi emelked\u00e9s k\u00edv\u00e1natos megel\u0151z\u00e9s\u00e9vel kapcsolatban. [The official position of the Hungarian College of Obstetrics and Gynecology regarding the proportion of caesarean sections and the prevention of further rise in caesarean section rate.]","volume":"66","author":"Papp Z","year":"2003","journal-title":"Magy N\u0151orv L"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_5_1","first-page":"269","article-title":"A cs\u00e1sz\u00e1rmetsz\u00e9sek gyakoris\u00e1g\u00e1nak v\u00e1ltoz\u00e1sa \u00e9s n\u00e9h\u00e1ny felt\u00e9telezett ok elemz\u00e9se az Uzsoki utcai k\u00f3rh\u00e1zban 1999. janu\u00e1r 1. \u00e9s 2009. j\u00fanius 30. k\u00f6z\u00f6tt. [Trends in prevalence of caesarean section in Uzsoki Hospital between 1st January, 1999 and 30th June, 2009. Analysis of some suspected factors.]","volume":"72","author":"Gyarmati B","year":"2009","journal-title":"Magy N\u0151orv L"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_6_1","first-page":"8","article-title":"Mikor szabad cs\u00e1sz\u00e1rmetsz\u00e9st v\u00e9gezni? [When performing a cesarean section is permissible?]","volume":"1","author":"Ugocsai GY","year":"2003","journal-title":"N\u0151gy\u00f3gy\u00e1szati \u00e9s Sz\u00fcl\u00e9szeti Tov\u00e1bbk\u00e9pz\u0151 Szemle"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_7_1","first-page":"269","article-title":"Gondolatok a cs\u00e1sz\u00e1rmetsz\u00e9s javallatair\u00f3l \u00e9s a frekvencia cs\u00f6kkent\u00e9s\u00e9nek lehet\u0151s\u00e9g\u00e9r\u0151l [Absolute and relative indications and co\u2010indications for caesarean sections.]","volume":"70","author":"Berk\u0151 P","year":"2007","journal-title":"Magy N\u0151orv L"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00147.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2007.00193.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00950.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2011.06.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02002.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/01674829809048501"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340902998436"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1556\/OH.2013.29682"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_16_1","first-page":"9","article-title":"Cs\u00e1sz\u00e1rmetsz\u00e9s anyai k\u00e9r\u00e9sre? Mi a d\u00e9l\u2010kelet magyarorsz\u00e1gi sz\u00fcl\u00e9szn\u0151k v\u00e9lem\u00e9nye? [Cesarean section on maternal request? Survey among south\u2010east Hungarian midwives.]","volume":"10","author":"Dweik D","year":"2011","journal-title":"B\u00e1b\u00e1k, sz\u00fcl\u00e9szn\u0151k"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_17_1","volume-title":"Discovering statistics using SPSS","author":"Field A","year":"2005"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2010.05.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1523-536X.2001.00101.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00108.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.04.034"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2008.10.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2008.12.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2011.08.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00140.x"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12729","type":"erratum","label":"Erratum","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,15]],"date-time":"2015-09-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1442275200000}}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Faogs.12353","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/aogs.12353","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,24]],"date-time":"2023-09-24T02:59:56Z","timestamp":1695524396000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/aogs.12353"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,23]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/aogs.12353"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12353","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2013-06-13","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-02-08","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-03-23","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}