{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T05:42:46Z","timestamp":1790228566553,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,5,28]],"date-time":"2014-05-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1401235200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/3.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>We appraised the methodology, execution and quality of the five published meta\u2010analyses that are based on the five randomized controlled trials which compared cardiotocography (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CTG<\/jats:styled-content>)+<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ST<\/jats:styled-content> analysis to cardiotocography. The meta\u2010analyses contained errors, either created <jats:italic>de novo<\/jats:italic> in handling of original data or from a failure to recognize essential differences among the randomized controlled trials, particularly in their inclusion criteria and outcome parameters. No meta\u2010analysis contained complete and relevant data from all five randomized controlled trials. We believe that one randomized controlled trial excluded in two of the meta\u2010analyses should have been included, whereas one randomized controlled trial that was included in all meta\u2010analyses, should have been excluded. After correction of the uncovered errors and exclusion of the randomized controlled trial that we deemed inappropriate, our new meta\u2010analysis showed that <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CTG<\/jats:styled-content>+<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ST<\/jats:styled-content> monitoring significantly reduces the fetal scalp blood sampling usage (risk ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.47\u20130.88), total operative delivery rate (0.93; 0.88\u20130.99) and metabolic acidosis rate (0.61; 0.41\u20130.91).<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12412","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,5,6]],"date-time":"2014-05-06T08:33:02Z","timestamp":1399365182000},"page":"571-586","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"title":["A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus <scp>ECG ST<\/scp> interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part <scp>II<\/scp>: the meta\u2010analyses"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"93","author":[{"given":"Per","family":"Olofsson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institution of Clinical Sciences Sk\u00e5ne University Hospital Lund University Malm\u00f6 Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Diogo","family":"Ayres\u2010de\u2010Campos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical School \u2013 S. Joao Hospital Institute of Biomedical Engineering Porto University Porto Portugal"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J\u00f6rg","family":"Kessler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway"},{"name":"Department of Clinical Sciences Clinical Fetal Physiology Research Group Bergen University Bergen Norway"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Britta","family":"Tendal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Danish Health and Medicines Authority Copenhagen Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Branka M.","family":"Yli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Delivery Department Mother and Child Clinic Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lawrence","family":"Devoe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical College of Georgia Georgia Regents University Augusta Georgia USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,5,28]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","first-page":"CD000116","article-title":"Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour","author":"Neilson JP","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823d8230"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1314886"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12009"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.01.028"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12413"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90273-L"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)05703-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00886.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181dfffd6"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01203.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182083dcd"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182083dcd"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c221"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","first-page":"635","article-title":"Interpreting and understanding meta\u2010analysis graphs \u2013 a practical guide","volume":"35","author":"Ried K","year":"2006","journal-title":"Aust Fam Physician"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","unstructured":"DevaneD.Systematic reviews. Statistical tests for heterogeneity. 27\/02\/2012. Available online at:www.iresearch4birth.eu\/iResearch4Birth\/resources\/cms\/documents\/Statistical_tests_for_heterogeneity_Declan_Devane.pdf(accessed February 10 2014)."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","unstructured":"Huedo\u2010MedinaT Sanchez\u2010MecaJ Marin\u2010MartinezF BotellaJ.Assessing heterogeneity in meta\u2010analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?2006.CHIP documents. Paper 19. Available online at:http:\/\/digitalcommons.uconn.edu\/chip_docs\/19(accessed February 10 2014)."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","volume-title":"Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions","author":"Higgins JPT"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","unstructured":"StatsDirect Ltd. Available online at:http:\/\/www.statsdirect.com\/webhelp\/#contents.htm%3FTocPath%3D_____1(accessed February 10 2014)."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.05.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.05.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","volume-title":"Fetal surveillance","author":"Sundstr\u00f6m A\u2010K","year":"2000"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01479.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701416903"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539508002295"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.05.043"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01364.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archneur.1976.00500100030012"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","unstructured":"WestgateJA.An evaluation of electronic fetal monitoring with clinical validation of ST waveform analysis during labour. Thesis University of Plymouth 1993."}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Faogs.12412","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/aogs.12412","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/aogs.12412","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/aogs.12412","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,13]],"date-time":"2023-09-13T21:02:36Z","timestamp":1694638956000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/aogs.12412"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,5,28]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/aogs.12412"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12412","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,5,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2014-02-16","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-04-30","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-05-28","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}