{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T10:45:06Z","timestamp":1761561906550},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,10]],"date-time":"2014-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1412899200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"name":"Allm\u00c3\u00a4na BB fonden"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The study objective was to improve ultrasonic diagnosis of retained placental tissue by measuring the volume of the uterine body and cavity using three\u2010dimensional (3D) ultrasound. Twenty\u2010five women who were to undergo surgical curettage due to suspected retained placental tissue were included. The volume of the uterine body and cavity was measured using the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VOCAL<\/jats:styled-content> imaging program. Twenty\u2010one women had retained placental tissue histologically verified. Three of these had uterine volumes exceeding the largest volume observed in the normal puerperium. Seventeen of the 21 women had a uterine cavity volume exceeding the largest volume observed in the normal puerperium. In all 14 cases examined 28\u00a0days or more after delivery the cavity volume exceeded the largest volume observed in the normal puerperium. A large cavity volume estimated with 3D ultrasound is indicative of retained placental tissue. However, 3D ultrasound adds little or no diagnostic power compared to 2D ultrasound.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12502","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,10]],"date-time":"2014-09-10T14:29:01Z","timestamp":1410359341000},"page":"112-116","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Three\u2010dimensional ultrasound does not improve diagnosis of retained placental tissue compared to two\u2010dimensional ultrasound"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"94","author":[{"given":"Johanna","family":"Belachew","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Women's and Children's Health Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ove","family":"Axelsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Women's and Children's Health Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden"},{"name":"Centre for Clinical Research S\u00f6rmland Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Karin","family":"Eurenius","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Women's and Children's Health Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ajlana","family":"Mulic\u2010Lutvica","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Women's and Children's Health Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(96)02667-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1966.tb05120.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","unstructured":"SpiliopoulosM.Normal and abnormal puerperium. Available at:www.emedicine.medscape.com\/article\/260187-overview(accessed December 9 2013)."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340903093559"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1989.tb01776.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-009-1227-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0096(199707)25:6<301::AID-JCU3>3.0.CO;2-G"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2849"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610120113238"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01418.x"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Faogs.12502","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/aogs.12502","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,24]],"date-time":"2023-09-24T06:45:17Z","timestamp":1695537917000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/aogs.12502"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,10]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/aogs.12502"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12502","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2013-12-06","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-09-07","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-10-10","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}