{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,6]],"date-time":"2025-11-06T20:00:42Z","timestamp":1762459242025},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,3]],"date-time":"2015-04-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1428019200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"name":"Duodecim (Finnish medical society)"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>To describe labor outcomes in women with prolonged pregnancy and induction of labor with a Foley catheter, as compared with women with spontaneous onset of labor.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design<\/jats:title><jats:p>Retrospective study.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title><jats:p>Helsinki University Hospital.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Sample<\/jats:title><jats:p>553 women with uncomplicated prolonged pregnancies between January 2011 and January 2012, divided into 303 women (54.8%) with Foley catheter induction and 250 (45.2%) with spontaneous labor.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Maternal and neonatal characteristics of women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy of \u226541<jats:sup>+5<\/jats:sup> weeks of gestation were analyzed.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measures<\/jats:title><jats:p>Cesarean delivery rates, maternal and neonatal morbidity.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The cesarean delivery rate was 30.7% (<jats:italic>n\u00a0<\/jats:italic>=<jats:italic>\u00a0<\/jats:italic>93\/303) in women with labor induction and 4.8% (12\/250) in women with spontaneous onset of labor (<jats:italic>p\u00a0<\/jats:italic>&lt;\u00a00.001). The cesarean delivery rate was 37.3% (91\/244) among nulliparous women with labor induction and 8.7% (11\/126) among women with spontaneous labor, a sixfold increased risk (odds ratio 6.2). Among parous women, cesarean section rates were low and not significantly different (3.4% vs. 0.8%, <jats:italic>p\u00a0<\/jats:italic>=\u00a00.2). There were no differences in maternal intrapartum or postpartum infection rates or adverse neonatal outcomes between the groups.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Foley catheter induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy did not increase maternal or perinatal morbidity compared with spontaneous onset of labor but was associated with a considerably increased cesarean section rate, particularly among nulliparous women.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12632","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,10]],"date-time":"2015-03-10T16:03:25Z","timestamp":1426003405000},"page":"608-614","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Management of prolonged pregnancy by induction with a Foley catheter"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"94","author":[{"given":"Heidi","family":"Kruit","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Oskari","family":"Heikinheimo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Veli\u2010Matti","family":"Ulander","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ansa","family":"Aitokallio\u2010Tallberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Irmeli","family":"Nupponen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Children's Hospital University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jorma","family":"Paavonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Leena","family":"Rahkonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200409000-00052"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jech-2013-203291"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","volume-title":"Perinatal statistics: parturients, deliveries and newborns 2011","author":"Vuori E","year":"2012"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","volume-title":"Perinatal statistics: parturients, deliveries and newborns 2013","author":"Vuori E","year":"2014"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.446"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.08.040"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","first-page":"1935","article-title":"Management of pregnancy beyond 40\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"71","author":"Briscoe D","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-005785"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","unstructured":"NICE Guideline.Induction of labor.2008. Available online at:http:\/\/guidance.nice.org.uk\/CG70(accessed March 20 2014)."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","first-page":"305","article-title":"Delivery route following elective induction of labor at term: analysis of 807 patients","volume":"5","author":"Rattigan MI","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Med Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17772\/gp\/1589"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","first-page":"A4913","article-title":"A more liberal approach towards induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy does not result in an adverse labour outcome","volume":"61","author":"Klefstad OA","year":"2014","journal-title":"Dan Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.130925"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.4.5834.237-a"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","first-page":"CD009792","article-title":"Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section","volume":"3","author":"Jozwiak M","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","first-page":"2093","article-title":"Foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol for labour induction","volume":"128","author":"Panelius E","year":"2012","journal-title":"Duodecim"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop EH","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000255665.77009.94"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01354-0"},{"issue":"6","key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","first-page":"917","article-title":"Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low\u2010risk women at term","volume":"95","author":"Maslow AS","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00115-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.500009"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12263"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2008-1064933"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_8_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor","volume":"114","author":"ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins \u2013 Obstetrics","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-6980(82)90081-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMcibr1404324"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_32_1","first-page":"CD001233","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"3","author":"Jozwiak M","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01843.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Faogs.12632","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/aogs.12632","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T13:02:34Z","timestamp":1695474154000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/aogs.12632"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,3]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/aogs.12632"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12632","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2014-12-30","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-03-04","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-04-03","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}