{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,4]],"date-time":"2026-04-04T02:04:09Z","timestamp":1775268249500,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,24]],"date-time":"2015-06-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1435104000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"name":"Competitive Rsearch Funding of Pirkanmaa Hospital District","award":["9R033"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["9R033"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real\u2010life performance of high\u2010risk (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HR<\/jats:styled-content>) <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HPV<\/jats:styled-content> testing in the triage of repeat atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ASC<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">US<\/jats:styled-content>) and low\u2010grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LSIL<\/jats:styled-content>).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Material and methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>In 2004\u20132012, 127 women with repeat <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ASC<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">US<\/jats:styled-content> and 118 women with <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LSIL<\/jats:styled-content> were triaged with <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HPV<\/jats:styled-content> testing using either a Hybrid Capture 2<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> or Abbott RealTime<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HR<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HPV<\/jats:styled-content> test. The patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for performance of the tests.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>In the repeat <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ASC<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">US<\/jats:styled-content> group, 40.9% of the women were positive for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HR<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HPV<\/jats:styled-content>. The prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>2+) was 8.7%. The sensitivity of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HR<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HPV<\/jats:styled-content> testing for detection of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>2+ was 90.9% (95% Cl 58.7\u201398.5%), with a specificity of 63.8% (95%<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content> 54.4\u201372.5%). In women \u226530\u00a0years old, the specificity was 70.4%, whereas in younger women it was only 27.8%. The negative predictive value to predict <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>3 was 100% (95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content> 95.2\u2013100.0%). Of the women with <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LSIL<\/jats:styled-content>, 68.6% were positive for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HR<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HPV<\/jats:styled-content> and the prevalence of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>2+ was 14.4%. The sensitivity of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HR<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HPV<\/jats:styled-content> testing for detection of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>2+ was 94.1% (95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content> 71.2\u201399.0%), and the specificity 35.6% (95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content> 26.4\u201345.8%), respectively. The negative predictive value to predict <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>3 was 100% (95% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content> 90.4\u2013100.0%).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HR<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HPV<\/jats:styled-content> testing seems to be beneficial in the triage of repeat <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ASC<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">US<\/jats:styled-content> in women \u226530\u00a0years old, but a high prevalence of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HR<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HPV<\/jats:styled-content> infection combined with poor specificity limit the use of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HPV<\/jats:styled-content> testing in the case of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LSIL<\/jats:styled-content>.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12686","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,5]],"date-time":"2015-06-05T15:18:29Z","timestamp":1433517509000},"page":"931-936","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["High risk <scp>HPV<\/scp> testing in the triage of repeat <scp>ASC<\/scp>\u2010<scp>US<\/scp> and <scp>LSIL<\/scp>"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"94","author":[{"given":"Olga","family":"Veijalainen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sanna","family":"Tuomisaari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Science Center Pirkanmaa Hospital District Tampere Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tiina","family":"Luukkaala","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Science Center Pirkanmaa Hospital District Tampere Finland"},{"name":"School of Health Sciences University of Tampere Tampere Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Johanna","family":"M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland"},{"name":"School of Medicine University of Tampere Tampere Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_9_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0215(20000501)86:3<429::AID-IJC20>3.0.CO;2-D"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_3_1","unstructured":"Finnish Cancer Register.Mean annual numbers of new cancer cases in 1966\u20102012 by primary site and period FEMALES1 [Internet].2012. Available from:http:\/\/stats.cancerregistry.fi\/stats\/eng\/veng0004i0.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djh037"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1612","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djp367","article-title":"Age\u2010specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting","volume":"101","author":"Leinonen M","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199203000-00006"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.02311-10"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10552-014-0414-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7291.893"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/path.981"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(03)00413-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/dc.20462"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2006.08.056"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.21955"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/93.4.293"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2005.09.050"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1582-4934.2008.00631.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_18_1","first-page":"CD008054","article-title":"Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions","volume":"3","author":"Arbyn M","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.27636"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-003460"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/92.5.397"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_2_9_22_1","first-page":"S3\/78","article-title":"Clinical applications of HPV testing: a summary of meta\u2010analyses","volume":"24","author":"Arbyn M","year":"2006","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.2000.5929"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Faogs.12686","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/aogs.12686","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,24]],"date-time":"2023-09-24T11:02:08Z","timestamp":1695553328000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/aogs.12686"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,24]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/aogs.12686"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12686","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2014-12-03","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-05-27","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-06-24","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}