{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T17:00:34Z","timestamp":1785517234147,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Wiley","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785456000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785456000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Since 60\u2009years, pH measurement in fetal scalp blood samples (FBS) is used to diagnose fetal hypoxia during labor, although the last three decades lactate measurement in FBS has been increasingly used as a safe alternative with a lower chance of failure. However, studies demonstrating the direct relation between lactate and pH in FBS with the currently used measurement systems are lacking. Therefore, clinical acceptance and implementation is impeded. This study investigated the relation between lactate and pH in FBS and derived an appropriate lactate cutoff value.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Material and Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This observational prospective single\u2010center study included 263 FBS in the period of 8 months. After collection of FBS, pH was assessed first (iSTAT\u00ae), after which lactate was assessed (StatStrip\u00ae Lactate 2). Clinical decisions were based on pH results only. Our primary objective was to assess the correlation between lactate and pH in FBS and to establish a lactate cutoff value for ruling out a low Apgar score at 5 minutes and neonatal acidosis, with corresponding sensitivity and specificity as secondary outcomes. Diagnostic performance of lactate was assessed by using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operation characteristic curve (ROC curve), from which cutoff values were derived.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In FBS, lactate and pH showed a moderate inverse linear correlation (\n                      <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009\u22120.53). The AUC of the ROC curve was 0.88 (0.83\u20130.93), indicating a good diagnostic performance of lactate to identify an abnormal pH (pH\u2009&lt;7.20 in FBS). A cutoff value for lactate of \u22655.6\u2009mmol\/L seemed to have the most optimal balance between sensitivity (78.1% [60.0\u201390.7%]) and specificity (79.2% [73.4\u201384.3%]) for a pH\u2009&lt;7.20 in FBS.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study confirmed that the StatStrip\u00ae Lactate 2 is a suitable alternative analyzer for measurement of lactate compared with measurement of pH with the iSTAT in FBS. Despite only a moderate correlation between lactate and pH, a lactate cutoff value of \u22655.6\u2009mmol\/L could be proposed for clinical decision\u2010making. This knowledge increased confidence of our gynecologists in this relatively new method and paved the way for successful and universal implementation of lactate in FBS, eventually without measuring pH.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.70329","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T16:11:32Z","timestamp":1785514292000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Toward implementation of lactate compared with\n                    <scp>pH<\/scp>\n                    in fetal scalp blood sampling during labor: A clinical comparative single\u2010center study"],"prefix":"10.1111","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9457-3760","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Suzanne J.","family":"van Woudenberg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology  Utrecht The Netherlands"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology  Arnhem The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ivonne","family":"Mijnheer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology  Arnhem The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marcel M. G. J.","family":"van Borren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical Chemistry  Arnhem The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3289-2512","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lian","family":"Roovers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical Research Center  Arnhem The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Femi","family":"Janse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology  Arnhem The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_13_2_1","unstructured":"Fetal monitoring in labour \u2010 NICE guidelines.2025.https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng229"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.020","article-title":"FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography","volume":"131","author":"Ayres\u2010de\u2010Campos D","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_4_1","unstructured":"NVOG richtlijn \u2010 intrapatrum foetale bewaking \u00e0 terme.2025.https:\/\/www.nvog.nl\/wp\u2010content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Foetale\u2010bewaking\u20103.0\u201014\u201011\u20102013.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12416","article-title":"Fetal scalp blood sampling during labor: an appraisal of the physiological basis and scientific evidence","volume":"93","author":"Chandraharan E","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_6_1","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non\u2010reassuring fetal heart rate trace","volume":"2015","author":"East CE","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.05.006","article-title":"Foetal scalp blood sampling during labour for pH and lactate measurements","volume":"30","author":"Carbonne B","year":"2016","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2025.102991","article-title":"Should fetal blood sampling still be a part of monitoring during labor in the modern era?","volume":"54","author":"Garabedian C","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09346.x","article-title":"Lactate compared with pH analysis at fetal scalp blood sampling \u2010 a prospective randomised study","volume":"105","author":"Westgren M","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39553.406991.25","article-title":"Determination of pH or lactate in fetal scalp blood in management of intrapartum fetal distress: randomised controlled multicentre trial","volume":"336","author":"Wiberg\u2010Itzel E","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(16)33082-4","article-title":"A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring","volume":"134","author":"Haverkamp AD","year":"1979","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_12_1","first-page":"351","article-title":"Cardiotocography supplemented with continuous fetal pH monitoring during labor. Effect on rate of obstetrical interventions and neonatal condition","volume":"61","author":"Weber T","year":"1982","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10878.x","article-title":"Scalp blood lactate: a new test strip method for monitoring fetal well being in labour","volume":"102","author":"Nordstr\u00f6m L","year":"1995","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.006","article-title":"Fetal scalp and cord blood lactate","volume":"18","author":"Nordstrom L","year":"2004","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2004.00306.x","article-title":"Determining the fetal scalp lactate level that indicates the need for intervention in labour","volume":"44","author":"Allen RM","year":"2004","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2015.12.005","article-title":"Lactate point\u2010of\u2010care testing for acidosis: cross\u2010comparison of two devices with routine laboratory results","volume":"4","author":"Horssen R","year":"2016","journal-title":"Pract Lab Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2024.e00375","article-title":"Are we ready for widespread implementation of lactate POCT in fetal blood sampling? An analytical and clinical verification of the novel statstrip POCT analyser","volume":"39","author":"Spronk N","year":"2024","journal-title":"Pract Lab Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(75)90072-1","article-title":"The acid\u2010base and biochemical characteristics of intrapartum fetal asphyxia","volume":"121","author":"Low JA","year":"1975","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30539-9","article-title":"Correlation of cord blood pH, base excess, and lactate concentration measured with a portable device for identifying fetal acidosis","volume":"36","author":"Labrecque L","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/S0950-3552(96)80035-6","article-title":"Fetal monitoring with lactate","volume":"10","author":"Nordstrom L","year":"1996","journal-title":"Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"18","key":"e_1_2_13_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1461","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2008.08.088","article-title":"Comparison and validation of point of care lactate meters as a replacement for fetal pH measurement","volume":"41","author":"Ridenour RV","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin Biochem"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13078","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of Statstrip((R)) lactate for use in fetal scalp blood sampling","volume":"96","author":"Heinis A","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1200","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1045863","article-title":"Lactate versus pH levels in fetal scalp blood during labor\u2010\u2010using the lactate scout system","volume":"29","author":"Rorbye C","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1159\/000262281","article-title":"Fetal scalp lactate microsampling for non\u2010reassuring fetal status during labor: a prospective observational study","volume":"27","author":"Ramanah R","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_25_1","first-page":"185","article-title":"Van pH naar lactaatbepaling: handvatten voor implementatie","volume":"4","author":"Martens L","year":"2025","journal-title":"NTOG"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1763","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000002864","article-title":"Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation","volume":"126","author":"Schober P","year":"2018","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1981.9.4.165","article-title":"Fetal scalp blood analysis","volume":"9","author":"Saling E","year":"1981","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16924","article-title":"Proposed cutoff for fetal scalp blood lactate in intrapartum fetal surveillance based on neonatal outcomes: a large prospective observational study","volume":"129","author":"Iorizzo L","year":"2022","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101964","article-title":"Fetal scalp blood sampling: do pH and lactates provide the same information?","volume":"50","author":"Prouheze A","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1515\/cclm-2013-0732","article-title":"Validation of a point\u2010of\u2010care (POC) lactate testing device for fetal scalp blood sampling during labor: clinical considerations, practicalities and realities","volume":"52","author":"Reif P","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Chem Lab Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01237.x","article-title":"Scalp blood lactate for intra\u2010partum assessment of fetal metabolic acidosis","volume":"90","author":"Heinis AM","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"12","key":"e_1_2_13_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2273","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.70080","article-title":"Validation and proposal of a clinical intervention cutoff in fetal scalp blood for the point\u2010of care\u2010lactate meter StatStrip((R))2","volume":"104","author":"Gellert S","year":"2025","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"e_1_2_13_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1496","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.15140","article-title":"The diagnostic accuracy of different fetal blood sample lactate cutoffs in labor, utilizing the StatStrip Xpress(R) lactate\u2010meter: a population\u2010based observational study","volume":"104","author":"Berge MB","year":"2025","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/aogs.70329","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/aogs.70329","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/aogs.70329","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T16:11:36Z","timestamp":1785514296000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/aogs.70329"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]]},"references-count":32,"alternative-id":["10.1111\/aogs.70329"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.70329","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-01-23","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-07-20","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-07-31","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"aogs.70329"}}