{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,27]],"date-time":"2025-11-27T16:10:43Z","timestamp":1764259843604},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,17]],"date-time":"2013-10-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1381968000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Ophthalmologica"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>To analyse developments in surgical treatment for keratoconus (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">KC<\/jats:styled-content>) by assessing rates and types of corneal surgery from 2005 to 2010.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">D<\/jats:styled-content>utch <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">T<\/jats:styled-content>ransplantation <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">F<\/jats:styled-content>oundation supplied data on all keratoplasty procedures for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">KC<\/jats:styled-content> performed from 2005 to 2010 in the Netherlands. Registration was carried out by the eyebank at allocation and by the surgeon at the time of surgery. The type of surgery was categorized as either a penetrating or a lamellar procedure.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Five hundred and seventy\u2010five anonymized records were received, with excellent data completion (99%). Patients undergoing penetrating surgery had on average a lower visual acuity, higher <jats:italic>k<\/jats:italic>\u2010readings and were slightly older compared with the lamellar group. A previous corneal hydrops was recorded for 19.1% of patients. Regular penetrating keratoplasty decreased in popularity from 79.7% in 2005 to 43.7% in 2010, due to the increased rate of lamellar surgery (42.5% in 2010) and \u2018mushroom\u2019 penetrating keratoplasty (13.8% in 2010). When hydrops cases were excluded, popularity became equal (47.6% penetrating versus 52.4% lamellar surgery, in 2010).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Lamellar surgery is gaining in popularity, although regular penetrating keratoplasty is still the more commonly performed procedure. Only when hydrops cases are excluded do transplant rates become comparable.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.12281","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,17]],"date-time":"2013-10-17T10:33:28Z","timestamp":1382006008000},"page":"473-477","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Does lamellar surgery for keratoconus experience the popularity it deserves?"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"92","author":[{"given":"Robert P. L.","family":"Wisse","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C\u00e9linde M. L.","family":"van den Hoven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Allegonda","family":"Van der Lelij","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e31822018b9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(01)01181-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003226-200205000-00009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcjo.2011.06.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archophthalmol.2011.1546"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e3181b77873"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2010.06.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-9071.2011.02681.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","unstructured":"Eye Bank Association of America(2010):2010 Eye Banking Statistical Report. Available at:http:\/\/www.restoresight.org."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e3181d25e4d"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-007-9177-z"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2009.05.028"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e3181b81b71"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2010.182329"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archophthalmol.2011.2585"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003226-200007000-00004"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/QAI.0b013e31815d2f71"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e31823d0412"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(02)01523-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","unstructured":"SteneviU FagerholmP BystromB HjortdalJ WendelE&ClaessonM(2012):Arsrapport Svenska Cornearegistret 2010\u20132011.6:8. Available at:http:\/\/www.cornea.nu."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003226-200009000-00006"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2011-300244"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","unstructured":"WilliamsK LoweM KeaneM JonesV LohR&CosterD(2012):The Australian Corneal Graft Registry 2012 report. Available at:http:\/\/www.flinders.edu.au\/medicine\/sites\/ophthalmology\/clinical\/the-australian-corneal-graft-registry.cfm."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2008.148981"}],"container-title":["Acta Ophthalmologica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Faos.12281","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Faos.12281","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/aos.12281","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T13:39:52Z","timestamp":1695476392000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/aos.12281"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,17]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/aos.12281"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aos.12281","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-375X","1755-3768"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1755-375X","type":"print"},{"value":"1755-3768","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2013-04-19","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-08-25","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-10-17","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}