{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T00:44:23Z","timestamp":1787013863675,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,13]],"date-time":"2017-12-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1513123200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Ophthalmologica"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare automated refraction 1\u00a0week and 1\u00a0month after uncomplicated cataract surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this prospective cohort study, we recruited patients in a 2\u2010month period and included consecutive patients scheduled for bilateral small\u2010incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery. The exclusion criteria were (i) corneal and\/or retinal pathology that could lead to automated refraction miscalculation and (ii) surgery complications. Automated refraction was measured 1\u00a0week and 1\u00a0month after surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Ninety\u2010five patients met the in\u2010 and exclusion criteria and completed follow\u2010up. The mean refractive shift in spherical equivalent was \u22120.02\u00a0dioptre (D) between 1\u00a0week and 1\u00a0month after surgery and not statistical significant (p\u00a0=\u00a00.78, paired\n                      <jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010test). The magnitude of refractive shift in either myopic or hyperopic direction was neither correlated to age, preoperative corneal astigmatism, axial length nor phacoemulsification energy used during surgery (p\u00a0&gt;\u00a00.05 for all variables, regression analysis). The refractive target was missed with 1.0\u00a0D or more in 11 (12%) patients. In this subgroup, the mean refractive shift in spherical equivalent was 0.49\u00a0D between 1\u00a0week and 1\u00a0month after surgery with a trend towards statistical significance (p\u00a0=\u00a00.07, paired\n                      <jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010test). There was no difference in age, preoperative corneal astigmatism, axial length or phacoemulsification energy used during surgery compared to the remainder of the patients (p\u00a0&gt;\u00a00.05 for all variables, unpaired\n                      <jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010test).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Automated refraction is stabile 1\u00a0week after uncomplicated cataract surgery, but there is a trend towards instability, if the refractive target is missed with 1.0\u00a0D or more.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.13545","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,13]],"date-time":"2017-12-13T00:52:40Z","timestamp":1513126360000},"page":"149-153","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["Automated refraction is stable 1\u00a0week after uncomplicated cataract surgery"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"96","author":[{"given":"Christoffer","family":"Ostri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology Rigshospitalet \u2013 Glostrup Copenhagen Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stig K.","family":"Holfort","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology Rigshospitalet \u2013 Glostrup Copenhagen Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marianne S.","family":"Fich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology Rigshospitalet \u2013 Glostrup Copenhagen Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Per","family":"Riise","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology Rigshospitalet \u2013 Glostrup Copenhagen Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2011.05.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1076\/stra.6.3.133.661"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2009.06.020"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","first-page":"351","article-title":"The role of viscoelatics, cannulas, and irrigating solution additives in post\u2010cataract corneal edema: a brief review","volume":"9","author":"Glaser DB","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lens Eye Toxic Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(96)80121-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.01.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318278fc44"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2005.09.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(03)00648-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2011.04.030"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(01)00894-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(99)00462-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(99)00325-9"}],"container-title":["Acta Ophthalmologica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Faos.13545","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/aos.13545","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T12:51:45Z","timestamp":1695473505000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/aos.13545"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,13]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/aos.13545"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aos.13545","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-375X","1755-3768"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1755-375X","type":"print"},{"value":"1755-3768","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2016-11-14","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2017-06-28","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2017-12-13","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}