{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T00:45:12Z","timestamp":1787013912109,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,30]],"date-time":"2015-09-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1443571200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Bioethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    One reason for the persistent appeal of\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">D<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    on\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    arquis' \u2018future like ours\u2019 argument (\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FLO<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    ) is that it seems to offer a way to approach the debate about the morality of abortion while sidestepping the difficult task of establishing whether the fetus is a person. This essay argues that in order to satisfactorily address both of the chief objections to\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FLO<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    \u2013 the \u2018identity objection\u2019 and the \u2018contraception objection\u2019 \u2013\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    arquis must take a controversial stand on what is most essential to being the kind of entity that an adult human being is. Such a stand amounts to a controversial account of personhood. To the extent that\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FLO<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    's success depends on accepting such a controversial metaphysical view, one apparent attraction of\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FLO<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    proves illusory.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12211","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,30]],"date-time":"2015-09-30T22:59:25Z","timestamp":1443653965000},"page":"272-281","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and\n                    <scp>M<\/scp>\n                    arquis's \u2018Future\u2010Like\u2010Ours\u2019 Argument"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Eric","family":"Reitan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,30]]},"container-title":["Bioethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fbioe.12211","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/bioe.12211","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,29]],"date-time":"2023-09-29T23:05:29Z","timestamp":1696028729000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/bioe.12211"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,30]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/bioe.12211"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bioe.12211","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0269-9702","1467-8519"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0269-9702","type":"print"},{"value":"1467-8519","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,30]]}}}