{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T05:57:40Z","timestamp":1791266260260,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,25]],"date-time":"2015-07-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1437782400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["British J Clinic Psychol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Diagnosis is ubiquitous in Psychiatry, and whilst it does bring benefits; adverse effects of \u2018labelling\u2019 may also be possible. This study aimed to evaluate experimentally whether clinicians\u2019 judgements about a patient with panic disorder were influenced by an inappropriately suggested diagnosis of comorbid borderline personality disorder (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      An experimental design was used to evaluate clinician's judgements when the nature of the information they were given was varied to imply\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      comorbidity.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Two hundred and sixty\u2010five clinicians watched a video\u2010recorded assessment of a woman describing her experience of uncomplicated \u2018panic disorder\u2019 and then rated her present problems and likely prognosis. Prior to watching the video recording, participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions with written information including the following: (1) her personal details and general background; (2) the addition of a behavioural description consistent with\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ; and (3) the further addition of a \u2018label\u2019 (past\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      diagnosis).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      label was associated with more negative ratings of the woman's problems and her prognosis than both information alone and a behavioural description of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BPD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2018symptoms\u2019.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Regardless of potential actuarial value of such diagnoses, it is concluded that clinicians can be overly influenced by past diagnostic labels in the context of an apparent current comorbid problem, although such biases appear to be less likely if a description of the relevant behaviours is used instead. Thus, the label, rather than the behaviour it denotes, may be stigmatizing in mental health professionals.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Practitioner points<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      <jats:list list-type=\"bullet\">\n                        <jats:list-item>\n                          <jats:p>Diagnostic labels can have an inappropriately negative effect on clinicians\u2019 judgements not only of treatment variables such as engagement and response but also risk issues and interpersonal effectiveness.<\/jats:p>\n                        <\/jats:list-item>\n                        <jats:list-item>\n                          <jats:p>Diagnostic labels can have a greater effect on clinicians\u2019 judgements than a behavioural description or clinical presentation.<\/jats:p>\n                        <\/jats:list-item>\n                        <jats:list-item>\n                          <jats:p>Clinicians should therefore be cautious both in the use of diagnostic labels to describe patients and ensure that these are still valid, and also be mindful of the influence that such labels can have on their own clinical judgements and constantly seek to challenge these.<\/jats:p>\n                        <\/jats:list-item>\n                        <jats:list-item>\n                          <jats:p>Behavioural descriptions of difficulties are less likely to result in such negative judgements and predictions.<\/jats:p>\n                        <\/jats:list-item>\n                      <\/jats:list>\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/bjc.12093","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,25]],"date-time":"2015-07-25T04:38:55Z","timestamp":1437799135000},"page":"253-268","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["\u2018Judging a book by its cover\u2019: An experimental study of the negative impact of a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder on clinicians\u2019 judgements of uncomplicated panic disorder"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"55","author":[{"given":"Danny C. K.","family":"Lam","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Kingston University &amp; St George's Hospital Medical School London UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paul M.","family":"Salkovskis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Bath UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lorna I.","family":"Hogg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Bath UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,25]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","first-page":"41","article-title":"The reliability of psychiatric diagnosis revisited: The clinician's guide to improve the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis","volume":"3","author":"Aboraya A.","year":"2006","journal-title":"Psychiatry"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1176\/appi.books.9780890425596"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0005-7967(99)00052-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10673220600975121"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1192\/bjp.bp.106.024026"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/09638237.2010.492484"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0033291700028488"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S109285291200020X"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.comppsych.2010.10.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1348\/1355325041719347"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-006X.67.4.583"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10608\u2010011\u20109393\u20108"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1099\u20100879(1999911)6:5<384::AID\u2010CPP218>3.0.CO;2\u20108"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0887\u20106185(97)00027\u20103"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/19404921\u201020090401\u201004"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/10299-000"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1466\u2010769X.2005.00205.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-0167.25.4.356"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/09638230500270842"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.soc.27.1.363"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2010.09.030"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1467\u20109566.00312"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/09638230310001627955"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1348\/01446650360703366"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archpsyc.59.5.434"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-006X.70.4.1051"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1521\/pedi.1989.3.3.205"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1192\/pb.bp.108.022863"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_30_1","first-page":"5","article-title":"Diagnoses and the behaviours they denote: A critical evaluation of the labelling of mental illness","volume":"3","author":"Ruscio J.","year":"2004","journal-title":"Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_31_1","volume-title":"Cognitive analytic therapy and borderline personality disorder","author":"Ryle A.","year":"1997"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_32_1","first-page":"287","volume-title":"Clinical advances in cognitive psychotherapy: Theory and application","author":"Sanderson W. C.","year":"2002"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_33_1","volume-title":"The patient and the analyst","author":"Sandler J.","year":"1973"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jad.2011.08.024"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1521\/pedi.2011.25.6.806"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1520\u20106629(199501)23:1<3::AID\u2010JCOP2290230102>3.0.CO;2\u2010W"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/000005053\u2010196810000\u201000003"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_38_1","volume-title":"ICD\u201010: The ICD\u201010 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines","author":"World Health Organisation","year":"1992"}],"container-title":["British Journal of Clinical Psychology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fbjc.12093","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/bjc.12093","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T12:41:12Z","timestamp":1761741672000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/bjc.12093"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,25]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/bjc.12093"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjc.12093","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0144-6657","2044-8260"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0144-6657","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-8260","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,25]]}}}